Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 1, 82 - 89, 15.04.2025

Abstract

References

  • Anastassov, J. 2006. Objects laténiens du Musée de Shoumen (Bulgarie), in: Sârbu, V. Vaida, D. (Eds.). Thracians and Celts. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Bistrița, 18–20 mai 2006. Cluj-Napoca, 2006, pp. 11–50.
  • Anastassov, J. 2011. The Celtic presence in Thrace during the 3rd century BC in the light of new archaeological data, in: Guštin, M., Jevtić, M. (Eds.). The Eastern Celts. The Communities between the Alps and the Black Sea. Koper-Beograd, pp. 227–239.
  • Beschi, L. 1980. Le arti plastiche, in: Da Aquileia a Venezia, Milano, Garzanti-Scheiwiller, 1980, pp. 337–449.
  • Boyadzhiev, K., Stamberova, M., Stefanova, T., Vasileva, Zh. 2023. 130 Selected objects from the collection of the National archaeological museum. National archaeological museum: Catalogues, vol. XXXIII.
  • Buora, M. 1992. Fibule da Aquileia nella collezione di toppo dei civici musei di Udine. Quaderni Friulani di Archeologia, II, pp. 5–22.
  • Dimitrov, D. P., Čičikova, M. 1978. The Thracian city of Seuthopolis. British Archaeological Reports (BAR), 38, Oxford.
  • Deppert-Lippitz, B. 2000. A Late antique crossbow fibula in the Metropolitan Museum of art. Metropolitan Museum Journal, 35, pp. 39–70.
  • Dolfini, A., Crellin, R. J. 2016. Metalwork wear analysis: the loss of innocence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66, pp. 78–87.
  • Gencheva, E. 2004. Rimskite fibuli ot Balgariya. Veliko Tarnovo: Faber (in Bulgarian).
  • Hayden, B. 1979. Lithic Use-wear Analysis. Academic Press, London.
  • Sych D., Nowak, K., Maciejewski, M., Miazga, B., Baron, J. 2020. Influence of conservation of copper and bronze artefacts on traces of production and use-wear. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12, pp. 1–12.
  • Živić, M. 2007. Catalogue of small finds from excavations extra muros in Romuliana (2004–2007). Starinar, LVII, pp. 277–307.
  • Nankov, E. 2008. The fortifications of the Early Hellenistic Thracian city of Seutopolis: Breaking the mould. Archaeologia Bulgarica, XII, 3, pp. 15–56.
  • Ogden, J. 1991. Classical gold wire: some aspects of its manufacture and use. Jewellery Studies, 5, pp. 95–105.
  • Ogden, J. 1992. Gold in Antiquity. Interdisciplinary science review, 17/3, pp. 261–270.
  • Ogden, J. 1993. Aesthetic and technical considerations regarding the colour and texture of ancient goldwork, in: La Niece, S., Craddock, P. (Eds.), Metal plating and patination: cultural, technical and historical developments. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp. 39–49.
  • Petković, S. 2010. Rimske fibule u Srbiji od I do V veka n. e. Beograd.
  • Riha, E. 1979. Die römischen Fibeln aus Augst und Kaiseraugst. Augst.
  • Sáez, C. G., Lerma, I. M. 2015. Traceology on metal. Use-wear marks on copper-based tools and weapons, in: Marreiros J. M., Bao J. F. G., Bicho N. F. (eds.). Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology, pp. 171–188.
  • Stamberova, M. 2023. The fibulae in Ancient Thrace (5th – 1st century BC). Dissertationes, vol. 16. Sofia: Prof Marin Drinov Publishing House of BAS.
  • Van Thienen, V. 2017. A symbol of Late Roman authority revisited: a sociohistorical understanding of the crossbow brooch, in: N Roymans, Heeren, S., Clercq, W. (Eds.), Social Dynamics in the Northwest Frontiers of the Late Roman Empire, pp. 97–125.
  • Williams, W., Ogden, J. 1994. Greek Gold: Jewellery of the Classical World. London.

Determining the Use-Life of Gold Fibulae: Mission (Im)Possible?

Year 2025, Volume: 1, 82 - 89, 15.04.2025

Abstract

Fibulae are often used as reliable chronological markers in archaeology. Their use-life could vary greatly depending on their shape, size and the material they were made of. Gold fibulae were extremely rare, although they were a sign of authority and wealth. Two miniature Early La Tène type of fibulae from the Early Hellenistic period and four massive Roman crossbow fibulae, all from the collection of the National Archaeological Institute with Museum in Sofia were examined by a non-destructive XRF analysis and microscopic traceological observation. The aim of the present research is to investigate the possibilities to determine if and how long these artefacts were used before their deposition and what happened to them after their discovery.

References

  • Anastassov, J. 2006. Objects laténiens du Musée de Shoumen (Bulgarie), in: Sârbu, V. Vaida, D. (Eds.). Thracians and Celts. Proceedings of the International Colloquium from Bistrița, 18–20 mai 2006. Cluj-Napoca, 2006, pp. 11–50.
  • Anastassov, J. 2011. The Celtic presence in Thrace during the 3rd century BC in the light of new archaeological data, in: Guštin, M., Jevtić, M. (Eds.). The Eastern Celts. The Communities between the Alps and the Black Sea. Koper-Beograd, pp. 227–239.
  • Beschi, L. 1980. Le arti plastiche, in: Da Aquileia a Venezia, Milano, Garzanti-Scheiwiller, 1980, pp. 337–449.
  • Boyadzhiev, K., Stamberova, M., Stefanova, T., Vasileva, Zh. 2023. 130 Selected objects from the collection of the National archaeological museum. National archaeological museum: Catalogues, vol. XXXIII.
  • Buora, M. 1992. Fibule da Aquileia nella collezione di toppo dei civici musei di Udine. Quaderni Friulani di Archeologia, II, pp. 5–22.
  • Dimitrov, D. P., Čičikova, M. 1978. The Thracian city of Seuthopolis. British Archaeological Reports (BAR), 38, Oxford.
  • Deppert-Lippitz, B. 2000. A Late antique crossbow fibula in the Metropolitan Museum of art. Metropolitan Museum Journal, 35, pp. 39–70.
  • Dolfini, A., Crellin, R. J. 2016. Metalwork wear analysis: the loss of innocence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66, pp. 78–87.
  • Gencheva, E. 2004. Rimskite fibuli ot Balgariya. Veliko Tarnovo: Faber (in Bulgarian).
  • Hayden, B. 1979. Lithic Use-wear Analysis. Academic Press, London.
  • Sych D., Nowak, K., Maciejewski, M., Miazga, B., Baron, J. 2020. Influence of conservation of copper and bronze artefacts on traces of production and use-wear. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 12, pp. 1–12.
  • Živić, M. 2007. Catalogue of small finds from excavations extra muros in Romuliana (2004–2007). Starinar, LVII, pp. 277–307.
  • Nankov, E. 2008. The fortifications of the Early Hellenistic Thracian city of Seutopolis: Breaking the mould. Archaeologia Bulgarica, XII, 3, pp. 15–56.
  • Ogden, J. 1991. Classical gold wire: some aspects of its manufacture and use. Jewellery Studies, 5, pp. 95–105.
  • Ogden, J. 1992. Gold in Antiquity. Interdisciplinary science review, 17/3, pp. 261–270.
  • Ogden, J. 1993. Aesthetic and technical considerations regarding the colour and texture of ancient goldwork, in: La Niece, S., Craddock, P. (Eds.), Metal plating and patination: cultural, technical and historical developments. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp. 39–49.
  • Petković, S. 2010. Rimske fibule u Srbiji od I do V veka n. e. Beograd.
  • Riha, E. 1979. Die römischen Fibeln aus Augst und Kaiseraugst. Augst.
  • Sáez, C. G., Lerma, I. M. 2015. Traceology on metal. Use-wear marks on copper-based tools and weapons, in: Marreiros J. M., Bao J. F. G., Bicho N. F. (eds.). Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology, pp. 171–188.
  • Stamberova, M. 2023. The fibulae in Ancient Thrace (5th – 1st century BC). Dissertationes, vol. 16. Sofia: Prof Marin Drinov Publishing House of BAS.
  • Van Thienen, V. 2017. A symbol of Late Roman authority revisited: a sociohistorical understanding of the crossbow brooch, in: N Roymans, Heeren, S., Clercq, W. (Eds.), Social Dynamics in the Northwest Frontiers of the Late Roman Empire, pp. 97–125.
  • Williams, W., Ogden, J. 1994. Greek Gold: Jewellery of the Classical World. London.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Classical Greek and Roman History
Journal Section Conference Paper
Authors

Miglena Stamberova

Petia Penkova This is me

Submission Date October 12, 2024
Acceptance Date December 31, 2024
Publication Date April 15, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 1

Cite

APA Stamberova, M., & Penkova, P. (2025). Determining the Use-Life of Gold Fibulae: Mission (Im)Possible? Archaeology of Western Anatolia, 1, 82-89.