Article types

Archaeology of western Anatolia will publish the following article types:
• Short Paper: A short article succinctly communicating new research results or substantive comment about previous research.
• Research Article: A report of original research which assesses the contribution of the research outcomes to the body of knowledge in a given area.
• Review Article: An essay or article that gives a critical evaluation of the current state of the research on a particular topic.
Articles do not normally exceed 6,000 words excluding figures, tables, highlights etc.

Peer review

This journal follows a double anonymized review process. Your submission will initially be assessed by our editors to determine suitability for publication in this journal. If your submission is deemed suitable, it will typically be sent to a minimum of two reviewers for an independent expert assessment of the scientific quality. The decision as to whether your article is accepted or rejected will be taken by our editors. Authors who wish to appeal the editorial decision for their manuscript may submit a formal appeal request in accordance with the procedure outlined in DergiPark’s Appeal Policy. Only one appeal per submission will be considered and the appeal decision will be final.
Read more about peer review.
Our editors are not involved in making decisions about papers which:
• they have written themselves.
• have been written by family members or colleagues.
• relate to products or services in which they have an interest.
Any such submissions will be subject to the journal's usual procedures and peer review will be handled independently of the editor involved and their research group. Read more about editor duties.

Special issues and article collections

The peer review process for special issues and article collections follows the same process as outlined above for regular submissions, except, a guest editor will send the submissions out to the reviewers and recommend a decision to the journal editor. The journal editor oversees the peer review process of all special issues and article collections to ensure the high standards of publishing ethics and responsiveness are respected and is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles.

Open access

We refer you to our open access information page to learn about open access options for this journal.

Ethics and policies

Ethics in publishing

Authors must follow ethical guidelines stated in DergiPark's Publishing Ethics Policy.

Submission declaration

When authors submit an article to an DergiPark journal it is implied that:
• the work described has not been published previously except in the form of a preprint, an abstract, a published lecture, academic thesis or registered report. See our policy on multiple, redundant or concurrent publication.
• the article is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
• the article's publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out.
• if accepted, the article will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder.
To verify compliance with our journal publishing policies, we may check your manuscript with our screening tools.

Authorship

All authors should have made substantial contributions to all of the following:
1. The conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data.
2. Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
3. Final approval of the version to be submitted.
All authors should agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work to ensure that the questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Changes to authorship

The editors of this journal generally will not consider changes to authorship once a manuscript has been submitted. It is important that authors carefully consider the authorship list and order of authors and provide a definitive author list at original submission.
The policy of this journal around authorship changes:
• All authors must be listed in the manuscript and their details entered into the submission system.
• Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of author names in the authorship list should only be made prior to acceptance, and only if approved by the journal editor.
• Requests to change authorship should be made by the corresponding author, who must provide the reason for the request to the journal editor with written confirmation from all authors, including any authors being added or removed, that they agree with the addition, removal or rearrangement.
• Only in exceptional circumstances will the journal editor consider the addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors post acceptance.
• Publication of the manuscript may be paused while a change in authorship request is being considered.
• Any authorship change requests approved by the journal editor will result in a corrigendum if the manuscript has already been published.
• Any unauthorised authorship changes may result in the rejection of the article, or retraction, if the article has already been published.

Declaration of interests

All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias their work. Examples of potential competing interests include:
• Employment
• Consultancies
• Stock ownership
• Honoraria
• Paid expert testimony
• Patent applications or registrations
• Grants or any other funding
The Declaration of Interests tool should always be completed.
Authors with no competing interests to declare should select the option, “I have nothing to declare”.
The resulting Word document containing your declaration should be uploaded at the “attach/upload files” step in the submission process. It is important that the Word document is saved in the .doc/.docx file format. Author signatures are not required.
We advise you to read our policy on conflict of interest statements, funding source declarations, author agreements/declarations and permission notes.

Funding sources
Authors must disclose any funding sources who provided financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article. The role of sponsors, if any, should be declared in relation to the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report and decision to submit the article for publication. If funding sources had no such involvement this should be stated in your submission.
It is not necessary to include detailed descriptions on the program or type of grants, scholarships and awards. When funding is from a block grant or other resources available to a university, college, or other research institution, submit the name of the institute or organization that provided the funding.
If no funding has been provided for the research, it is recommended to include the following sentence:
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing

Authors must declare the use of generative AI in scientific writing upon submission of the paper. The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:
• Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies should only be used in the writing process to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.
• The technology must be applied with human oversight and control and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased. Authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.
• Authors must not list or cite AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author on the manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing must be declared by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is first submitted. The statement will appear in the published work and should be placed in a new section before the references list. An example:
• Title of new section: Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process.
• Statement: During the preparation of this work the author(s) used [NAME TOOL / SERVICE] in order to [REASON]. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the published article.
The declaration does not apply to the use of basic tools, such as tools used to check grammar, spelling and references. If you have nothing to disclose, you do not need to add a statement.
We advise you to read our policy for authors on the use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies for DergiPark.
Please note: to protect authors' rights and the confidentiality of their research, this journal does not currently allow the use of Generative AI or AI-assisted technologies such as ChatGPT or similar services by reviewers or editors in the peer review and manuscript evaluation process. We are actively evaluating compliant AI tools and may revise this policy in the future.

AUTHORS
• Authors have academic, ethical and social responsibility.

• Authors are obliged to submit their original (previously unpublished) work to the journal and to follow the writing instructions given on the journal website.
• Authors are responsible for not committing ethical violations such as plagiarism, labor theft, improper referencing, or forgetting a reference in the article they submit. If a contrary situation is detected, the article will be rejected.
• If authors have received study/research support, they must indicate the source in their article.
• If there is more than one author contributing to the study, the order of names sent by these authors during the application must be a joint decision of the authors.
• If authors detect errors or inaccuracies after publication of their articles, they must immediately inform the journal editors so that appropriate action can be taken.
• Authors cannot publish the same article, in whole or in part, in more than one journal without providing an appropriate justification, permission or cross-reference.
• In the case of studies conducted with live participants that require ethics committee approval, authors are obliged to obtain institutional ethics committee approval.
• Authors must provide a clear statement explaining that the necessary consents from human subjects were obtained and that the rights of the participants were respected.
• Authors can only withdraw their articles during the preliminary evaluation process.