ADEZİVLER: GENEL İLKELER VE TEKNİĞİN SON DURUMU

Abstract

AMAÇ: Adezyon, iki substratın bir araya gelmesiyle meydana gelen bir adeziv bağlantı oluşması sürecidir. YÖNTEMLER: Bondlanmış bir restorasyonun esas amacı, restoratif materyal ile dental substrat arasında sıkı bir adaptasyon sağlamaktır. Bu bağlanma sürecini minede sağlamak dentinde sağlamaktan daha zordur.

BULGULAR: Bu, dentinin daha nemli ve daha organik bir yapıya sahip olmasından kaynaklanmaktadır. Adezyonu sağlamak amacıyla kullanılan tekniklerden total etch sistemlerle elde edilen bağlanma kuvvetlerinin, özellikle mineye bağlanmada, halen self etch sistemlere üstün oldukları gözlenmektedir. Bununla birlikte, self etch sistemlerin de, kolay uygulanma ve uygulama zamanını kısaltması gibi avantajları bulunmaktadır. Bu durum, pedodontik diş hekimliği gibi zor alanlarda diş hekimlerine kolaylık sağlamaktadır.

SONUÇ: Günümüzde, adeziv sistemlerde pek çok yeni gelişme olmakla birlikte, diş hekimlerinin bu gelişmeleri düzenli olarak takip etmeleri ve uygun materyalleri seçmeleri ile restoratif tedavilerin klinik başarısı ve ömrü arttırılacaktır.

Keywords

• adezyon,mineye bağlanma

ADHESIVES: GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND THE STATE OF ART

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Adhesion is a process of forming an adhesive joint, which keeps two substrates joined together.

METHODS: The aim of a bonded restoration to provide an intimate adaption of the restorative material with the dental substrate. This is more difficult to achieve as the bonding process for enamel is different from that for dentin.

RESULTS: This depends on that the dentine is more humid and more organic than enamel. Bonding strength of the total etch strategy, one of the techniques used to ensure adhesion, is superior to self-etch strategy, especially when binding to enamel. Although, self-etch strategies have advantages like application simplicity and time. These features make it easy for difficult application areas like pediatric dentistry.

CONCLUSION: Nowadays, with many developments of adhesive systems, the life of restorative treatments and clinical success will be increased when dentists follow these developments regularly and choose suitable materials.

Keywords

• Dioxin,dioxinanddioxin-likechemicals,TCDD

References

1. 1. Jensen ME. Chapter 3: Dentin bonding agents. In: Aschheim KW, Dale BG. Esthetic Dentistry / A clinical approach to techniques and materials, 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby-Year Book Inc, 2001:41-3.
2. 2. Perdigao J, Swift EJ. Fundamental concept of enamel and dentin adhesion. Ed. Roberson, TM, Heymann, HO, Swift, EJ, In: Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry. Fifth ed. Missouri, Mosby Inc. 2006.
3. 3. Dayangaç B. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. 2. Bölüm: Bonding sistemleri. Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi, 2000:21-39.
4. 4. Küçükeşmen Ç, Sönmez H. Bağlayıcı sistemler/Adeziv sistemler/Mine-dentin bonding ajanlar. Akademik Dental Diş Hekimliği Dergisi 2007;9:7-13.
5. 5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-883
6. 6. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int. 1995 Feb;26(2):95-110.
7. 7. Silverstone LM: Fissure sealants: Laboratory studies. Caries Res 8: 2-26, 1974
8. 8. Manson-Rahemtulla B, Retief DH, Jamison HC: Effect of concentrations of phosphoric acid on enamel dissolution, J Prosthet Dent 51:495-498, 1984

9. 9. Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding to Dentin: Smear layer and the process of hybridization In: G. Eliades DC, Watts T. Eliades, eds. Dental Hard Tissues and Bonding. Chapter 5. Springer-Berlin, 2005:89-118
10. 10. Vicente A, Bravo LA, Romero M. Self-etching primer and non-rinse conditioner versus phosphoric acid: alternative methods for bonding brackets. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:173-8.
11. 11. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003;15(1):32-41
12. 12. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Lopes MM. Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion. Quintessence Int. 2006 Jan;37(1):35-41
13. 13. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44.
14. 14. Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials. 2005;26(9):1035-42
15. 15. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):647-60.
16. 16. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6(4):313-8
17. 17. Perdigão J, Gomes G, Duarte S Jr, Lopes MM. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent. 2005 ;30(4):492-9.
18. 18. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM, Pashley DH. Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(1):9-28.
19. 19. Speirs RL. The nature of surface enamel in human teeth. Calcif Tissue Res 1971; 8: 1-16.
20. 20. Ishikawa A, Shimada Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strengths of current self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 161-166.
21. 21. Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Pre-etching vs. grinding in promotion of adhesion to intact enamel using self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2012;14
22. 22. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Kimmes NS, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM. Effect of enamel etching time on roughness and bond strength. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 217-222.
23. 23. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lopes MM. Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 35-41.
24. 24. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 20-27.
25. 25. Sano H. Microtensile testing, nanoleakage, and biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 11-14.
26. 26. Tam LE, Khoshand S, Pilliar RM. Fracture resistance of dentin-composite interfaces using different adhesive resin layers. J Dent 2001; 29: 217-225
27. 27. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.
28. 28. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura G, Matsumoto K. Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17: 105-9.
29. 29. Chimello-Sousa DT, Souza AE, Chinelatti MA, P´ecora JD, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SAM. Influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation distance on the bond strength of a restorative system to enamel. J Dent 2006; 34: 245-51.
30. 30. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo, Quintessence Publishing Co. 1998:1-106.
31. 31. Yuan Y, Shimada Y, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Hybridization quality in cervical cementum and superficial dentin using current adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 584-93.
32. 32. Erhardt MCG, Toledano M, Osorio R, Piment LA. Histomorphologic characterization and bond strength evaluation of caries-affected dentin/resin interfaces:Effects of long-term water exposure. Dent Mater 2008; 2: 786-98.
33. 33. Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 44: 813-22.
34. 34. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 39-49
35. 35. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(1):47-56
36. 36. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater. 2005;21(11):999-1007.
37. 37. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005 May;21(5):397-412.
38. 38. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, Waller JL, Pashley DH. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005:7(2):133-41
39. 39. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater. 2001;17(5):373-80
40. 40. Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Yiu C, Kumagai H, Kudou Y, Kubota M, Oguchi H. SEM and TEM analysis of water degradation of human dentinal collagen. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 Jul 15;66(1):287-98.
41. 41. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Yiu C, Pashley DH. Durability of resin-dentin bonds related to water and oil storage. Am J Dent. 2005;18(6):315-9.
42. 42. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Tay FR, Kaga M, Kudou Y, Oguchi H, Araki Y, Kubota M. Micromorphological changes in resin-dentin bonds after 1 year of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(3):306-11.
43. 43. Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2001;12(2):136-51.
44. 44. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30(7-8):371-82.
45. 45. Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent. 2002 4(4):255-69.
46. 46. Tay FR, Lai CN, Chersoni S, Pashley DH, Mak YF, Suppa P, Prati C, King NM. Osmotic blistering in enamel bonded with one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2004 Apr;83(4):290-5.
47. 47. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):183-8.
48. 48. Can Say E, Nakajima M, Senawongse P, Soyman M, Ozer F, Ogata M, Tagami J. Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique. J Dent. 2006;34(4):283-91.
49. 49. Türkün SL. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):527-34.
50. 50. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater. 2005 Apr;21(4):375-83.
51. 51. Küçükeşmen Ç, Erdoğan Y. Süt ve daimi dişlerde bağlayıcı ajanların etkinliği, biyouyumluluğu ve sitotoksisitesi. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak. Derg. 2009: 16(1)/ 48-55