Soil radioactive pollution in Falluja-Iraq

Abstract

Applying the CR-39, Solid State Nuclear Track Detector, the radioactivity of the soil in Fallujah City was measured at the ground depths 0-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm respectively. The soil samples were collected during summer 2014. At the surface, 0-20 cm depth, the measured radioactivity corresponding to depleted uranium concentration of 1.12.5 ppm, showed lower values as compared with the tolerated average value of 2.8 ppm DU . The detected activity values at the 20-40 cm and 40-60 cm depths were not negligible, 1.0-2.3 ppm and 0.9-2.0 ppm respectively. The results indicate the diffusion of the radioactive material, accepted as depleted Uranium, down the soil layer within the 3 levels. Adding the ppm values at the three depths together yields radioactivity values of 3.1-6.8 ppm, which are greater than the IAE tolerated value of 2.8 ppm. The ‘accumulated activity’ represents the initial value for the contamination. The formation process dates back to the year 2005, of the 2nd Falluja confrontation. The period required for the diffusion down the soil extends over 9-10 years. The high numeric value of the radioactive contamination 3.0-6.8 ppm DU can permit us to understand the origin of the increase in cancer disease cases, women repetitive abortions, malformations and generic deformations of newly borne babies, following the year 2005, as reported by the health administrations of the city

Keywords

• Falluja,Iraq,soil,radioactivity,CR-39

Falluja-Irak'ta toprak radyoaktif kirliliği

Abstract

CR-39, Katı Hal Nükleer Yol Dedektörünü uygulayarak, Felluce Şehri'ndeki toprağın radyoaktivitesi, sırasıyla 0-20, 20-40 ve 40-60 cm'lik toprak derinliklerinde ölçülmüştür. Toprak örnekleri 2014 yılının yaz mevsimi boyunca toplanmıştır. Yüzeyde, 0-20 cm derinliğinde, 1.1-2.5 ppm'lik tükenmiş uranyum konsantrasyonuna karşılık gelen ölçülen radyoaktivite değeri, tolere edilen 2.8 ppm ortalama değerine kıyasla daha düşük değerler göstermiştir. 20-40 cm ve 4060 cm derinliklerinde tespit edilen aktivite değerleri, sırasıyla, 1.0-2.3 ppm ve 0.9-2.0 ppm olarak göz ardı edilemezdi. Sonuçlar, tükenmiş uranyum olarak kabul edilen radyoaktif malzemenin, 3 kattaki toprak tabakasında aşağı doğru yayıldığını göstermektedir. Üç derinlikte ppm değerlerinin toplanması, 3.1-6.8 ppm'nin radyoaktivite değerlerini verir, bu da 2.8 ppm'lik IAE tolere edilen değerden daha büyüktür. "Birikmiş etkinlik", kirlenmenin başlangıç değerini temsil eder. Formasyon süreci, 2. Felluce çatışmasının 2005 yılına kadar uzanmaktadır. Toprak aşağı difüzyon için gerekli süre 9-10 yıl boyunca uzanır. Radyoaktif kontaminasyon 3.0-6.8 ppm DU'nın yüksek sayısal değeri, 2005 yılından itibaren, şehrin sağlık yönetimi dikkate alındığında, kanser hastalarında görülen artış, kadınların tekrarlayan düşükleri, yeni doğan bebeklerin sakat olması ve genel deformasyonlarını anlamamızı sağlayabilir

Keywords

• Felluce,Irak,toprak,radyoaktivite,CR-39

References

1. AbdEl-Sabour, M.F. (2007). Remediation and bioremediation of uranium contaminated soils. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem., 6, 2009-2023.
2. Anonymous. (2017). Category Archives, Birth Defects Iraq, April 1, 2017, Fallujah General Hospital.
3. Anonymous. (2013). Dahr Jamail, March 18, 2013. Aljazeerah English, Fallujah Babies and Depleted Uranium, America’s Toxic Legacy in Iraq, Alternet. a- Dahr, Jamail, Jan. 2012, Fallujah Babies under a new kind of Siege, Aljazeerah.
4. Anonymous (2012). Thomas Gaist, World Socialists Website, Oct. 2012, Toxic Fallout from US war produces record child birth defects in Iraq.
5. Apps, M.J., Duke, M.J.M., Stephens-Newsham, L.G. (1988). A study of radionuclides in vegetation on abandoned uranium tailings. J. Radioanalytical Nuclear Chem., 123, 133-147.
6. Baes, C.F. (1982). Environmental transport and monitoring: Prediction of radionuclide Kd values from soil-plant concentration ratios. Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 42, 53-54.
7. Cazzola, P., Cena, A., Ghignone, S., Abete, M.C., Andruetto, S. (2004). Experimental system to displace radioisotopes from upper to deeper soil layers: chemical research. Environmental Health, 3(1), 5.
8. Durrani, S., Bull, R. (1987). Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors, Principles, Methodology and Application. Elsevier Book Company.

9. Ebbs, S.D. (1997). Identification of plant species and soil amendments that improve the phytoextraction of zinc and uranium from contaminated soil. Faculty of Graduate Studies. Cornell University, Michigan, 174.
10. Ebbs, S.D., Norvell, W.A., Kochian, L.V. (1998). The effect of acidification and chelating agents on the solubilisation of uranium from contaminated soil. J. Environ. Qual., 27, 1486-1494.
11. Fleischer, L., Price, B., Robert, W. (1975). Nuclear Track in Solid; Principles and Applications. University of California Press.
12. Gavrilescu, M., Pavel, L.V., Cretescu, I. (2009). Characterization and remediation of soils contaminated with uranium. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2-3), 475-510.
13. Gongalsky, K.B. (2003). Impact of pollution caused by uranium production on soil macrofauna. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 89(2), 197-219.
14. Groudev, S.N., Georgiev, P.S., Spasova, I., Nicolova, M. (2007). Bioremediation of acid mine drainage in an uranium deposit. Advanced Materials Research, 20, 248-257.
15. Gupta, C.K. (2006). Chemical metallurgy: principles and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
16. Huang, J.W., Blaylock, M.J., Kapulnik, Y., Ensley, B.D. (1998). Phytoremediation of uranium-contaminated soils: role of organic acids in triggering uranium hyperaccumulation in plants. Environmental Science & Technology, 32(13), 2004-2008.
17. IAEA. (2001). Manual of Acid In situ Leach Uranium Mining Technology, IAEATECDOC-1239, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section, IAEA-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
18. IAEA. (2002a). Technologies for the treatment of effluents from uranium mines, mills and tailings, in: Proceedings of a Technical Committee Meeting Held in Vienna, November 1-4, 1999, IAEA-TECDOC-1296, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section, IAEA-International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
19. IAEA. (2002b). Non-technical Factors Impacting on the Decision Making Processes in Environmental Remediation, IAEA- International Atomic Energy Agency TECDOC-1279, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
20. IAEA. (2005a). Environmental contamination from uranium production facilities and their remediation, In: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Environmental Contamination from Uranium Production Facilities and Their Remediation organized by The International Atomic Energy Agency in Lisbon, February 11-13, 2004, Vienna.
21. IAEA. (2005b). Status and Trends in Spent Fuel Reprocessing, Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA-TECDOC-1467, Vienna.
22. Ibrahim, S.A., Whicker, F.W. (1988). Comparative uptake of U and Th by native plants at a U production site. Health Phys., 54(4), 413-419.
23. Ibrahim, M., Adrees, M., Rashid, U., Raza, S.H., Abbas, F. (2015). Phytoremediation of radioactive contaminated soils. Soil Remediation and Plants, 599-627.
24. Igwe, J.C., Nnororm, I.C., Gbaruko, B.C. (2005). Kinetics of radionuclides and heavy metals behaviour in soils: Implications for plant growth. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4(13), 1541-1547.
25. Merritt, R.S. (1971). The extractive metallurgy of uranium. Colorado School of Mines Research Institute, Golden, Colorado.
26. Navratil D.J. (2001). Advances in treatment methods for uranium contaminated soil and water. Archive of Oncology, 9(4), 257-260.
27. Norman, D.K., Raforth, R.L. (1998). Innovations and trends in reclamation of metal-mine tailings in Washington. Washington Geology, 26(2/3), 29-42.
28. Ozturk, M., Turkan, I., Selvi, S. (1987). Plants and Radioactive pollution. Doğa TU Botanik D., 11(3), 322-329.
29. Ozturk, M., Ozdemir, F., Gokler, I., Guvensen, A. (1994). Plants as silent witnesses of radioactivity. E.U. Fen Fak. Dergisi Seri B Ek, 16(1), 53-57.
30. Rivas, M.D.C. (2005). Interactions between soil uranium contamination and fertilization with N, P and S on the uranium content and uptake of corn, sunflower and beans, and soil microbiological parameters. Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL).
31. Roh, Y., Lee, S.R., Choi, S.K., Elless, M.P., Lee, S.Y. (2000). Physicochemical and mineralogical characterization of uranium- contaminated soils. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 9(5), 463-486.
32. Savchenko, V.K. (1996). The ecology of the Chernobyl catastrophe. Scientific outlines of an International programme of collaborative research. Man and Biosphere Series, vol. 16, Informa Health Care Publisher.
33. Sheppard, M.I., Sheppard, S.C., Thibault, D.H. (1984). Uptake by plants and migration of uranium and chromium in field lysimeters. J. Environ. Qual., 13, 357-361.
34. Sheppard, M.I., Thibault, D.H., Sheppard, S.C. (1985). Concentrations and concentration ratios of U, As and Co in Scots Pine grown in waste site soil and an experimental contaminated soil. Water. Air. Soil. Pollut., 26, 85-94.
35. Sheppard, S.C., Evenden, W.G., Pollock, R.J. (1989). Uptake of natural radionuclides by field and garden crops. Can. J. Soil Sci., 69, 751-767.
36. Szydlowski, A., Sazowski, M., Czyzewski, T., Jasskola, M., Korman, A. (1999). Comparison of Response of CR-39, PM-355 and PM- 600 Track Detectors to Low Energy Nitrogen and Helium Ions” Nucl. Inst. and Meth. in Phys. Res., 149, 113.
37. UNSCEAR. (1994). United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation, “Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, United Nations.
38. Whicker, F.W., Ibrahim, S.A. (1984). Radioecological investigations of uranium mill tailings systems. Colorado State Unv, Fort Collins, 48.