Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye'de yaşayan Somalili kadınların kadın sünnetinin sağlık ve doğum sorunlarına bilimsel bir yaklaşım

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 41 - 52
https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2025.1401447

Abstract

Kadın sünneti Afrika'da yaygın olmasına rağmen, Orta ve Uzak Doğu başta olmak üzere birçok ülkede 200 milyondan fazla kadın tarafından uygulandığı dünya çapında bir gerçektir. Dünyanın farklı ülkelerinde farklı şekillerde yapılmaktadır. Sakatlama sonrası kadın genital bölgesindeki anatomik doku kaybı nedeniyle yaşam boyu sürecek fizyolojik, psikiyatrik ve obstetrik sorunlar kaçınılmazdır. Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de yaşayan Somalili kadınların engellilik dereceleri, doğum sorunları, davranış ve tutumları araştırıldı. Bu amaçla 15 ilde 190 Somalili kadının durumu araştırıldı. Kadın sünneti çeşitli parametreler kullanılarak incelendi ve normallik testlerinde istatistiksel ki-kare testleri ve sürekli niceliksel değişkenler değerlendirildi. Bu amaçla veriler parametrik veya parametrik olmayan testlerin sonuçları dikkate alınarak sunulmuştur. Türkiye'de yaşayan Somalili kadınların neredeyse tamamının sünnetli olduğu, ancak sünnet oranının dünya ortalamasının biraz altında olduğu belirlendi. Sünnet ekonomik durum, eğitim, kültürel gelenekler ve aile yapısıyla yakından ilişkiliydi. Kadın sünnetinin birçok obstetrik ve psikiyatrik soruna neden olduğu tespit edildi. Türkiye'de yaşayan Somalili kadınların kadın sünnetine yönelik tutumunun, eğitim düzeyi, hane geliri, farkındalık ve iletişim olanaklarının artmasıyla önemli ölçüde değiştiği tespit edildi. Eğitim, kültürel değişim, mali durum, sağlık hizmetleri düzeyi ve ebelik hizmetleri kadın sünnetini etkili bir şekilde azalttı.

References

  • [1] Earp, B.D. & Johnsdotter, S. (2021). Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation. International Journal of Impotence Research, 33:196-209.
  • [2] O’Neill, S. & Pallitto, C. (2021). The Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Psycho-Social Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 31:1738-50.
  • [3] Lurie, J.M., Weidman, A., Huynh, S., Delgado, D., Easthausen, I. & Kaur, G. (2020). Painful gynecologic and obstetric complications of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 17:e1003088.
  • [4] Balachandran, A.A., Duvalla, S., Sultan, A.H. & Thakar, R. (2018). Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation? International Urogynecol Journal, 29:339-44.
  • [5] Farouki, L., El-Dirani, Z., Abdulrahim, S., Akl, C., Akik, C. & McCall, S.J. (2022). The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies. PLoS Medicine,19:e1004061.
  • [6] Tordrup, D., Bishop, C., Green, N., Petzold, M., Vallejo, F.R., Vogel, J.P., et al. (2022). Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.7:e004512.
  • [7] Fund, U.N.C. & Gupta, G.R. (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. Reproductive Health Matters, 184-90.
  • [8] Berg, R.C. & Denison, E. (2012). Interventions to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in African countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8:1-155.
  • [9] Ameyaw, E.K., Tetteh, J.K., Armah-Ansah, E.K., Aduo-Adjei, K. & Sena-Iddrisu, A. (2020). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Sierra Leone: are educated women intending to circumcise their daughters? BMC International Health and Human Rights, 20 (19):2-11.
  • [10] Berg, R.C., Underland, V., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Fretheim, A. & Vist, G.E. (2014). Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 4:e006316.
  • [11] Powell, R.A. & Yussuf, M. (2022). Medical narrative and religious norm driving cut type and medicalization changes in female genital mutilation/cutting in Somaliland. Health Care for Women International, 43:722-45.
  • [12] Ertop, N.G. & Altay, B. (2012). 15-49 yaş arası evli kadınların kullandıkları aile planlaması yönteminin eş uyumuna etkisinin incelenmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 1-8.
  • [13] Clayson, P. E., Carbine, K. A., Baldwin, S. A. & Larson, M. J. (2019). Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event‐related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability. Psychophysiology, 56(11), e13437.
  • [14] Alsibiani, S. A. & Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and sterility, 93(3), 722-724.
  • [15] Abdulcadir, J., Catania, L., Hindin, M.J., Say, L., Petignat, P. & Abdulcadir, O. (2016). Female genital mutilation. Obstetrics & Gynecology,128:958-63.
  • [16] Yount, K. M., & Abraham, B. K. (2007). Female genital cutting and HIV/AIDS among Kenyan women. Studies in family planning, 38(2), 73-88.
  • [17] Wagner, N. (2015). Female genital cutting and long-term health consequences–nationally representative estimates across 13 countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 51:226-46.
  • [18] Buggio, L., Facchin, F., Chiappa, L., Barbara, G., Brambilla, M., & Vercellini, P. (2019). Psychosexual consequences of female genital mutilation and the impact of reconstructive surgery: a narrative review. Health Equity, 3(1), 36-46.
  • [19] Dilbaz, B., İflazoğlu, N. & Tanın, S.A. (2019). An overview of female genital mutilation. Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 16:129-32.
  • [20] Allen, C., Reid, M., Thwaites, J., Glover, R., & Kestin, T. (2020). Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Experience from Australia. Sustainability Science, 15, 521-538.
  • [21] Abdulcadir, J., Rodriguez, M. I., Petignat, P., & Say, L. (2015). Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies. The journal of sexual medicine, 12(1), 274-281.
  • [22] Gele, A. A., Kumar, B., Hjelde, K. H., & Sundby, J. (2012). Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study. International Journal of women's Health, 7-17.
  • [23] Grubbs, J. B., Hoagland, K. C., Lee, B. N., Grant, J. T., Davison, P., Reid, R. C., & Kraus, S. W. (2020). Sexual addiction 25 years on: A systematic and methodological review of empirical literature and an agenda for future research. Clinical Psychology Review, 82, 101925.
  • [24] Palm, C., Elmerstig, E., Holmström, C. & Essén, B. (2023). The relationship between dominant Western discourse and personal narratives of female genital cutting: exploring storytelling among Swedish-Somali girls and women. Frontiers in sociology, 8:1188097.

A scientific approach to the health and obstetrical problems of female genital mutilation of Somali women living in Turkey

Year 2025, Volume: 18 Issue: 1, 41 - 52
https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2025.1401447

Abstract

Although female genital mutilation is widespread in Africa, it is a worldwide fact that it is practiced by more than 200 million women in many countries, especially in the Middle and Far East. It is performed in different ways in different countries around the world. Lifelong physiological, psychiatric, and obstetric problems are inevitable due to the loss of anatomical tissue in the female genital area after mutilation. In this study, the degree of disability, obstetric problems, behavior, and attitudes of Somali women living in Turkey were investigated. For this purpose, the situation of 190 Somali women in 15 provinces. Female genital mutilation was studied using a variety of parameters, and statistical chi-square tests and continuous quantitative variables were evaluated in normality tests. For this purpose, the data were presented considering the results of parametric or nonparametric tests. It was found that almost all Somali women living in Turkey are circumcised, but the mutilation rate is slightly lower than the global average. Circumcision was closely related to economic status, education, cultural traditions, and family structure. FGM was found to cause many obstetric and psychiatric problems. It was found that the attitude of Somali women living in Turkey towards female genital mutilation changes significantly with increasing education level, household income, awareness, and communication opportunities. Education, cultural change, financial situation, level of health care, and midwifery services effectively reduced FGM.

Thanks

This study is summarized from Hawa Hussain AHMED's master's thesis (A midwifery perspective on the lives, health, and birth problems of Somali women subjected to FGM and living in Turkey. 10547514). Advisor: Dr. N. BİLİCİ. We are grateful to Karabuk University for its human resources contribution to science.

References

  • [1] Earp, B.D. & Johnsdotter, S. (2021). Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation. International Journal of Impotence Research, 33:196-209.
  • [2] O’Neill, S. & Pallitto, C. (2021). The Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Psycho-Social Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 31:1738-50.
  • [3] Lurie, J.M., Weidman, A., Huynh, S., Delgado, D., Easthausen, I. & Kaur, G. (2020). Painful gynecologic and obstetric complications of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine, 17:e1003088.
  • [4] Balachandran, A.A., Duvalla, S., Sultan, A.H. & Thakar, R. (2018). Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation? International Urogynecol Journal, 29:339-44.
  • [5] Farouki, L., El-Dirani, Z., Abdulrahim, S., Akl, C., Akik, C. & McCall, S.J. (2022). The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies. PLoS Medicine,19:e1004061.
  • [6] Tordrup, D., Bishop, C., Green, N., Petzold, M., Vallejo, F.R., Vogel, J.P., et al. (2022). Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries.7:e004512.
  • [7] Fund, U.N.C. & Gupta, G.R. (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. Reproductive Health Matters, 184-90.
  • [8] Berg, R.C. & Denison, E. (2012). Interventions to reduce the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting in African countries. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8:1-155.
  • [9] Ameyaw, E.K., Tetteh, J.K., Armah-Ansah, E.K., Aduo-Adjei, K. & Sena-Iddrisu, A. (2020). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Sierra Leone: are educated women intending to circumcise their daughters? BMC International Health and Human Rights, 20 (19):2-11.
  • [10] Berg, R.C., Underland, V., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Fretheim, A. & Vist, G.E. (2014). Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open, 4:e006316.
  • [11] Powell, R.A. & Yussuf, M. (2022). Medical narrative and religious norm driving cut type and medicalization changes in female genital mutilation/cutting in Somaliland. Health Care for Women International, 43:722-45.
  • [12] Ertop, N.G. & Altay, B. (2012). 15-49 yaş arası evli kadınların kullandıkları aile planlaması yönteminin eş uyumuna etkisinin incelenmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 1-8.
  • [13] Clayson, P. E., Carbine, K. A., Baldwin, S. A. & Larson, M. J. (2019). Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event‐related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability. Psychophysiology, 56(11), e13437.
  • [14] Alsibiani, S. A. & Rouzi, A. A. (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertility and sterility, 93(3), 722-724.
  • [15] Abdulcadir, J., Catania, L., Hindin, M.J., Say, L., Petignat, P. & Abdulcadir, O. (2016). Female genital mutilation. Obstetrics & Gynecology,128:958-63.
  • [16] Yount, K. M., & Abraham, B. K. (2007). Female genital cutting and HIV/AIDS among Kenyan women. Studies in family planning, 38(2), 73-88.
  • [17] Wagner, N. (2015). Female genital cutting and long-term health consequences–nationally representative estimates across 13 countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 51:226-46.
  • [18] Buggio, L., Facchin, F., Chiappa, L., Barbara, G., Brambilla, M., & Vercellini, P. (2019). Psychosexual consequences of female genital mutilation and the impact of reconstructive surgery: a narrative review. Health Equity, 3(1), 36-46.
  • [19] Dilbaz, B., İflazoğlu, N. & Tanın, S.A. (2019). An overview of female genital mutilation. Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 16:129-32.
  • [20] Allen, C., Reid, M., Thwaites, J., Glover, R., & Kestin, T. (2020). Assessing national progress and priorities for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Experience from Australia. Sustainability Science, 15, 521-538.
  • [21] Abdulcadir, J., Rodriguez, M. I., Petignat, P., & Say, L. (2015). Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: case studies. The journal of sexual medicine, 12(1), 274-281.
  • [22] Gele, A. A., Kumar, B., Hjelde, K. H., & Sundby, J. (2012). Attitudes toward female circumcision among Somali immigrants in Oslo: a qualitative study. International Journal of women's Health, 7-17.
  • [23] Grubbs, J. B., Hoagland, K. C., Lee, B. N., Grant, J. T., Davison, P., Reid, R. C., & Kraus, S. W. (2020). Sexual addiction 25 years on: A systematic and methodological review of empirical literature and an agenda for future research. Clinical Psychology Review, 82, 101925.
  • [24] Palm, C., Elmerstig, E., Holmström, C. & Essén, B. (2023). The relationship between dominant Western discourse and personal narratives of female genital cutting: exploring storytelling among Swedish-Somali girls and women. Frontiers in sociology, 8:1188097.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Medical Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hawa Hussein Ahmed 0000-0002-7014-6764

Namık Bilici 0000-0002-4320-3567

Mustafa Cengiz 0000-0002-6925-8371

Yılmaz Altuner 0000-0002-8162-2842

Rıfat Ertekin 0000-0002-8041-8030

Adnan Ayhancı 0000-0003-4866-9814

Early Pub Date February 24, 2025
Publication Date
Submission Date December 8, 2023
Acceptance Date September 9, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 18 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ahmed, H. H., Bilici, N., Cengiz, M., Altuner, Y., et al. (2025). A scientific approach to the health and obstetrical problems of female genital mutilation of Somali women living in Turkey. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 18(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2025.1401447

❖  Abstracted-Indexed in
Web of Science {Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Records Indexed] Clavariate Analytic, Medical Reads (RRS), CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.

❖ Libraries
Aberystwyth University; All libraries; Bath University; Birmingham University; Cardiff University; City University London; CONSER (Not UK Holdings); Edinburgh University; Essex University; Exeter University; Eskişehir Technical University Library; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Feng Chia University Library; GAZİ Gazi University Library; Glasgow University; HEC-National Digital Library; Hull University; Imperial College London; Kaohsinug Medical University Library; ANKOS; Anadolu University Library; Lancaster University; Libros PDF; Liverpool University; London Metropolitan University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Manchester University; National Cheng Kung University Library; National ILAN University Library; Nottingham University; Open University; Oxford University; Queen Mary,University of London;Robert Gordon University; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sheffield Hallam University; Sheffield University; Shih Hsin University Library; Smithsonian Institution Libraries; Southampton University; Stirling University; Strathclyde University; Sussex University; The National Agricultural Library (NAL); The Ohio Library and Information NetWork; Trinity College Dublin; University of Washington Libraries; Vaughan Memorial Library; York University..

❖ The article processing is free.

❖ Web of Science {Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Records Indexed] Clavariate Analytic
❖ This journal is a CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon. member

❖ Please visit ” http:// www.biodicon.com“ ; "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon"   for instructions about articles and all of the details about journal


❖  Correspondance Adres: Prof. Ersin YÜCEL, Sazova Mahallesi, Ziraat Caddesi, No.277 F Blok, 26005 Tepebaşı-Eskişehir/Türkiye
E-posta / E-mail: biodicon@gmail.com;
Web Address: http://www.biodicon.com;   https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon
❖ Biological Diversity and Conservation/ Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma
❖ ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online
❖ Start Date Published 2008
© Copyright by Biological Diversity and Conservation/Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma-Available online at www.biodicon.com/All rights reserved
Publisher : ERSİN YÜCEL (https://www.ersinyucel.com.tr/)
❖ This journal is published three numbers in a year. Printed in Eskişehir/Türkiye.
❖ All sorts of responsibilities of the articles published in this journal are belonging to the authors
Editör / Editor-In-Chief : Prof.Dr. Ersin YÜCEL, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7578