Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışma, jelatinimsi yapısı nedeniyle DNA izolasyonu zor olan denizanası Aurelia aurita’dan elde edilecek DNA verimini optimize etmeyi; doku türü, enzimatik inkübasyon süresi ve farklı izolasyon yöntemlerinin etkilerini karşılaştırarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır.
Yöntem: Toplamda üç farklı DNA izolasyon yöntemi (salting-out, kit bazlı ve Trizol bazlı) dört farklı doku türü (gonad, tentakül, epidermis ve gastrodermis) üzerinde uygulanmış, her biri Proteinaz K ile 0, 1, 3 ve 24 saat inkübasyona tabi tutulmuştur. Böylece 48 farklı kombinasyon analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: En yüksek DNA konsantrasyonları gonad dokularında elde edilmiş olup bu durum, dokunun yüksek hücresel yoğunluğu ve yapısal bütünlüğü ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Özellikle 1–3 saatlik Proteinaz K uygulamasıyla birlikte salting-out yöntemi, diğer iki yönteme kıyasla daha yüksek verim sağlamıştır. Aşırı nemli olan epidermis ve gastrodermis dokularında ise yaş ağırlık ölçümünde sapmalar oluşmuş ve bu durum biyolojik girdiye göre DNA veriminin olduğundan düşük hesaplanmasına neden olmuştur.
Sonuç: Jelatinöz denizel omurgasızlardan DNA izolasyonunda doku seçimi, enzimatik inkübasyon süresi ve kullanılan metodoloji büyük önem taşımaktadır. Aurelia aurita örneklerinde, özellikle gonad dokusuna 1–3 saatlik Proteinaz K uygulaması ile salting-out yöntemi kullanımı, verimli ve güvenilir bir DNA izolasyonu için önerilmektedir.
FLO-2024-40848
Purpose: This study aimed to optimize DNA extraction from the moon jellyfish Aurelia aurita, a gelatinous marine invertebrate, by comparing different methodologies and evaluating the influence of tissue type and Proteinase K treatment duration on DNA yield.
Method: A total of 48 different combinations were tested using three extraction methods (salting-out, kit-based, and Trizol-based) across four tissue types (gonads, tentacles, epidermis, and gastrodermis). Each method was applied with varying Proteinase K incubation times (0, 1, 3, and 24 hours) to assess their impact on DNA yield and integrity.
Findings: Gonadal tissues consistently provided the highest DNA concentrations, likely due to their relatively high cellular density and structural robustness. Among the methods, the salting-out protocol yielded superior results, particularly with 1–3 hours of Proteinase K incubation. In contrast, highly hydrated tissues such as epidermis and gastrodermis led to underestimated yields due to distorted wet weight measurements.
Conclusion: Tissue selection, enzymatic treatment time, and extraction methodology critically affect DNA recovery from jellyfish. The salting-out method, when applied to gonadal tissue with moderate Proteinase K incubation, is recommended for efficient and reliable DNA isolation from Aurelia aurita.
Not applicable.
Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) of Istanbul University
FLO-2024-40848
Dr. Habeş Bilal AYDEMİR and Dr. Esra SU
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Genetics (Other), Zoology (Other) |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Project Number | FLO-2024-40848 |
Early Pub Date | September 25, 2025 |
Publication Date | October 4, 2025 |
Submission Date | May 12, 2025 |
Acceptance Date | August 13, 2025 |
Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 18 Issue: 3 |
❖ Indexes
{Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record] Clavariate Analytic, Medical Reads (RRS), CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.
❖ Libraries
Aberystwyth University; All libraries; Bath University; Birmingham University; Cardiff University; City University London; CONSER (Not UK Holdings); Edinburgh University; Essex University; Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Library, Exeter University; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Feng Chia University Library; GAZİ Gazi University Library; Glasgow University; HEC-National Digital Library; Hull University; Imperial College London; Kaohsinug Medical University Library; ANKOS; Anadolu University Library; Lancaster University; Libros PDF; Liverpool University; London Metropolitan University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Manchester University; National Cheng Kung University Library; National ILAN University Library; Nottingham University; Open University; Oxford University; Queen Mary,University of London;Robert Gordon University; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sheffield Hallam University; Sheffield University; Shih Hsin University Library; Smithsonian Institution Libraries; Southampton University; Stirling University; Strathclyde University; Sussex University; The National Agricultural Library (NAL); The Ohio Library and Information NetWork; Trinity College Dublin; University of Washington Libraries; Vaughan Memorial Library; York University.
❖ Articles published in the journal “Biological Diversity and Conservation” are freely accessible. No article processing charge (APC) is charged.
❖ Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record, Clavariate Analytic
❖ This journal is a member of CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.
❖ For published articles and full details about the journal, please visit http://www.biodicon.com; https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/yayin/biodicon.
❖ Correspondence Address:: Prof. Ersin YÜCEL, Sazova Mahallesi, Ziraat Caddesi, No.277 F Blok, 26005 Tepebaşı-Eskişehir/Türkiye
❖ E-mail: biodicon@gmail.com;
❖ Web Address: http://www.biodicon.com; https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/biodicon
❖ Biological Diversity and Conservation
❖ ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online
❖ Publication Start Date 2008
❖ © Copyright by Biological Diversity and Conservation/Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma; Available online at www.biodicon.com. All rights reserved.
. ❖ Publisher: ERSİN YÜCEL (https://www.ersinyucel.com.tr)
❖ This Journal is published three times a year. It is printed in Eskişehir, Türkiye.
❖ The authors are solely responsible for the articles published in this Journal .
❖ Editör : Prof.Dr. Ersin YÜCEL, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7578