Carbon Dioxide Absorption Using Different Solvents (MEA, NaOH, KOH and Mg(OH)2) in Bubble Column Reactor

Yıl 2023, , 418 - 427, 27.06.2023

Ayse Gul , Ümran Tezcan Ün

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1230356

Öz

The aim of this research is to reduce emissions by capturing carbon dioxide in a solution using an absorption method. The absorption capacity, absorption rate, carbon dioxide removal efficiency, and overall mass transfer coefficient of MEA (Monoethanolamin) and alkaline solvents (NaOH, KOH, Mg(OH)2) were investigated using a bubble column gas absorption reactor with counter current flow. The effects of operational parameters such as solvent concentration (0.01, 0.05, and 0.25M) and solvent type were studied. As a result of the study, it was determined that Mg(OH)2 was less effective in capturing CO2 than KOH, NaOH, and MEA. For all solvent types, the total mass transfer coefficient, absorption rate, and CO2 removal efficiency were increased with the increase in the concentration of solvent. The solvent concentration is increased from 0.01 M to 0.25 M to obtain the highest KGa values for MEA, NaOH, and KOH, 3.75 1/min for MEA, 3.70 1/min for NaOH, and 3.93 1/min for KOH.The MEA, NaOH, and KOH absorption rates were maximum at 0.25 M solvent concentrations as 0.19x103 mol/Ls. The maximum CO2 removal efficiencies for MEA, NaOH, and KOH at 0.25 M solvent concentration are greater than 60%. The highest absorption capacity, 0.576 mol CO2/mol MEA, was obtained at a solvent concentration of 0.01M MEA.

Anahtar Kelimeler

absorption, alkaline solvent, bubble column reactor, MEA

Destekleyen Kurum

Anadolu University

Proje Numarası

1706F386

Kaynakça

• [1] H. B. Ameur, X. Han, Z. Liu, and J. Peillex, “When did global warming start? A new baseline for carbon budgeting,” Econ. Model., vol. 116, no. 106005, p. 106005, 2022.
• [2] H.-I. Eum, B. Fajard, T. Tang, and A. Gupta, “Potential changes in climate indices in Alberta under projected global warming of 1.5–5 °C,” J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., vol. 47, no. 101390, p. 101390, 2023.
• [3] A. Elhambakhsh, M. R. Zaeri, M. Mehdipour, and P. Keshavarz, “Synthesis of different modified magnetic nanoparticles for selective physical/chemical absorption of CO2 in a bubble column reactor,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, p. 104195, 2020.
• [4] A. Balraj, A. P. C. Sekaran, N. Ramamurthy, R. Babarao, K. K. Nagarajan, and S. A. Mayilvahanan, “Systematic review on sono-assisted CO2 stripping, solvent recovery and energy demand aspects in solvent-based post-combustion carbon dioxide capture process,” Chem. Eng. Process., vol. 170, no. 108723, p. 108723, 2022.
• [5] H. Ling, S. Liu, H. Gao, and Z. Liang, “Effect of heat-stable salts on absorption/desorption performance of aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) solution during carbon dioxide capture process,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 212, pp. 822–833, 2019.
• [6] W. He, S. Zhang, C. Zhu, T. Fu, and Y. Ma, “CO2 chemical absorption into AMP aqueous solution and mass transfer intensification in cascade sudden expansion microchannels,” Chem. Eng. Process., no. 109142, p. 109142, 2022.
• [7] Y. Li et al., “Synergetic effect and mechanism between propylene carbonate and polymer rich in ester and ether groups for CO2 physical absorption,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 336, no. 130389, p. 130389, 2022.
• [8] W.-H. Lai, D. K. Wang, M.-Y. Wey, and H.-H. Tseng, “ZIF-8/styrene-IL polymerization hollow fiber membrane for improved CO2/N2 separation,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 372, no. 133785, p. 133785, 2022.
• [9] K. Kiełbasa, Ş. Bayar, E. A. Varol, J. Sreńscek-Nazzal, M. Bosacka, and B. Michalkiewicz, “Thermochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass - olive pomace - into activated biocarbon for CO2 adsorption,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 187, no. 115416, p. 115416, 2022.
• [10] Y. Bi and Y. Ju, “Design and analysis of CO2 cryogenic separation process for the new LNG purification cold box,” Int. J. Refrig., vol. 130, pp. 67–75, 2021.
• [11] H. Leflay, J. Pandhal, and S. Brown, “Direct measurements of CO2 capture are essential to assess the technical and economic potential of algal-CCUS,” J. CO2 util., vol. 52, no. 101657, p. 101657, 2021.
• [12] P.-C. Chen, W. Shi, R. Du, and V. Chen, “Scrubbing of CO2 greenhouse gases, accompanied by precipitation in a continuous bubble-column scrubber,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 6336–6343, 2008.
• [13] Z. Ziobrowski, R. Krupiczka, and A. Rotkegel, “Carbon dioxide absorption in a packed column using imidazolium based ionic liquids and MEA solution,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 47, pp. 8–16, 2016.
• [14] M. Yoo, S.-J. Han, and J.-H. Wee, “Carbon dioxide capture capacity of sodium hydroxide aqueous solution,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 114, pp. 512–519, 2013.
• [15] H. Pashaei, M. N. Zarandi, and A. Ghaemi, “Experimental study and modeling of CO2 absorption into diethanolamine solutions using stirrer bubble column,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 121, pp. 32–43, 2017.
• [16] F. Chu, L. Yang, X. Du, and Y. Yang, “Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column,” Appl. Energy, vol. 190, pp. 1068–1080, 2017.
• [17] Y. Yuan and G. T. Rochelle, “CO2 absorption rate in semi-aqueous monoethanolamine,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 182, pp. 56–66, 2018.
• [18] F. R. H. Abdeen, M. Mel, M. S. Jami, S. I. Ihsan, and A. F. Ismail, “A review of chemical absorption of carbon dioxide for biogas upgrading,” Chin. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 693–702, 2016.
• [19] T. Li, T. C. Keener, and L. Cheng, “Carbon dioxide removal by using Mg(OH)2 in a bubble column: Effects of various operating parameters,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 31, pp. 67–76, 2014.
• [20] R. Maceiras, E. Álvarez, and M. Á. Cancela, “Effect of temperature on carbon dioxide absorption in monoethanolamine solutions,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 138, no. 1–3, pp. 295–300, 2008.
• [21] U. E. Aronu et al., “Solubility of CO2 in 15, 30, 45 and 60 mass% MEA from 40 to 120°C and model representation using the extended UNIQUAC framework,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 66, no. 24, pp. 6393–6406, 2011.
• [22] H. N. Abdul Halim, A. M. Shariff, L. S. Tan, and M. A. Bustam, “Mass transfer performance of CO2 absorption from natural gas using monoethanolamine (MEA) in high pressure operations,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1675–1680, 2015.
• [23] G. Yincheng, N. Zhenqi, and L. Wenyi, “Comparison of removal efficiencies of carbon dioxide between aqueous ammonia and NaOH solution in a fine spray column,” Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 512–518, 2011.
• [24] J. I. Huertas, M. D. Gomez, N. Giraldo, and J. Garzón, “CO2 Absorbing Capacity of MEA,” J. Chem., vol. 2015, pp. 1–7, 2015.
• [25] P.-C. Chen, “Absorption of carbon dioxide in a bubble-column scrubber,” in Greenhouse Gases - Capturing, Utilization and Reduction, InTech, 2012.
• [26] X. Wu, M. He, Y. Yu, Z. Qin, and Z. Zhang, “Overall mass transfer coefficient of CO2 absorption in a diameter-varying spray tower,” Energy Procedia, vol. 114, pp. 1665–1670, 2017.
• [27] L. Cheng, T. Li, T. C. Keener, and J. Y. Lee, “A mass transfer model of absorption of carbon dioxide in a bubble column reactor by using magnesium hydroxide slurry,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 17, pp. 240–249, 2013.