Research Article

Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials

Volume: 14 Number: 1 March 26, 2025
EN

Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials

Abstract

This study focuses on phase change material-based passive thermal protection of electronic components that release heat for a period of time. Firstly, an investigation was carried out in terms of PCM thickness for thermal protection and it was determined that an 11 mm thickness was the appropriate PCM thickness. It was determined that the thermal conductivities in the solid phase could be improved by 35.9%, 119.2%, and 178.6%, respectively, if 1%, 3%, and 5% GNP were doped into the PCM. In the case of 1%, 3%, and 5% GNP doping, it was determined that the melting temperatures of PCM did not change, whereas the latent heat of melting decreased slightly depending on the GNP fraction. The deterioration in the latent melting heat for 5% GNP/RT-44 composite was measured as 5.4%. Then, the thermal protection performance of PCM, Fin/PCM, Nanoparticle/PCM, and Nanoparticle/Fin/PCM composites on an electronic component that releases heat for a period of time was compared in terms of maximum surface temperature and maximum surface temperature difference. The results indicated that the Nanoparticle/PCM thermal protection exhibited a performance improvement effect predominantly during sensible heat storage, whereas the Fin/PCM thermal protection demonstrated an improvement in performance during both sensible heat and latent heat storage. While all thermal protection methods were successful at 3 W heating power, only PCM thermal protection equipped with six fins (6F/PCM) was successful at 6W heating power. At 6 W heating power, maximum temperature and maximum temperature difference performances were improved by 15.3% and 45.2%, respectively, with 6F/PCM thermal protection compared to PCM thermal protection only. An increase in the GNP mass fraction above 3% has been demonstrated to have a detrimental effect on thermal protection. With 3% GNP/6F/PCM hybrid thermal protection, it was determined that the maximum temperature and maximum temperature difference performances have the potential to be improved by 22.3% and 53.4% compared to PCM thermal protection.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

The study is complied with research and publication ethics.

References

  1. A. E. Kabeel, A. Khalil, S. M. Shalaby, and M. E. Zayed, “Experimental investigation of thermal performance of flat and v-corrugated plate solar air heaters with and without PCM as thermal energy storage,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 113, pp. 264–272, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.068.
  2. P. Mihálka, C. Lai, S. Wang, and P. Matiaˇ, “Experimental investigation of the daily thermal performance of a mPCM honeycomb wallboard,” vol. 159, pp. 419–425, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.080.
  3. Y. Galazutdinova, S. Ushak, M. Farid, S. Al-Hallaj, and M. Grágeda, “Development of the inorganic composite phase change materials for passive thermal management of Li-ion batteries: Application,” J. Power Sources, vol. 491, no. June 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229624.
  4. W. L. Cheng, B. J. Mei, Y. N. Liu, Y. H. Huang, and X. D. Yuan, “A novel household refrigerator with shape-stabilized PCM (Phase Change Material) heat storage condensers: An experimental investigation,” Energy, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 5797–5804, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.050.
  5. K. Du, J. Calautit, P. Eames, and Y. Wu, “A state-of-the-art review of the application of phase change materials (PCM) in Mobilized-Thermal Energy Storage (M-TES) for recovering low-temperature industrial waste heat (IWH) for distributed heat supply,” Renew. Energy, vol. 168, pp. 1040–1057, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.057.
  6. D. Mondieig, F. Rajabalee, A. Laprie, H. A. J. Oonk, T. Calvet, and M. A. Cuevas-Diarte, “Protection of temperature sensitive biomedical products using molecular alloys as phase change material,” Transfus. Apher. Sci., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1473-0502(03)00016-8.
  7. V. Chinnasamy and H. Cho, “Thermophysical investigation of metallic nanocomposite phase change materials for indoor thermal management,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 7626–7641, 2022, doi: 10.1002/er.7664.
  8. Ü. N. Temel and B. Y. Ç. İ. F. T. Ç. İ, “DETERMINATION OF THERMAL PROPERTIES OF A82 ORGANIC PHASE CHANGE MATERIAL EMBEDDED WITH DIFFERENT TYPE NANOPARTICLES LIST OF SEYMBOLS,” pp. 75–85, 2018.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Energy Generation, Conversion and Storage (Excl. Chemical and Electrical)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 26, 2025

Submission Date

August 7, 2024

Acceptance Date

March 5, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 1

APA
Çapar, A. C., & Temel, Ü. N. (2025). Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 13-38. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320
AMA
1.Çapar AC, Temel ÜN. Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025;14(1):13-38. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320
Chicago
Çapar, Ahmet Can, and Ümit Nazlı Temel. 2025. “Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 14 (1): 13-38. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320.
EndNote
Çapar AC, Temel ÜN (March 1, 2025) Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 14 1 13–38.
IEEE
[1]A. C. Çapar and Ü. N. Temel, “Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials”, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–38, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320.
ISNAD
Çapar, Ahmet Can - Temel, Ümit Nazlı. “Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 14/1 (March 1, 2025): 13-38. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320.
JAMA
1.Çapar AC, Temel ÜN. Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025;14:13–38.
MLA
Çapar, Ahmet Can, and Ümit Nazlı Temel. “Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 13-38, doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Can Çapar, Ümit Nazlı Temel. Performance Comparisons of Thermal Protection Methods Based on Thermally Enhanced Phase Change Materials. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2025 Mar. 1;14(1):13-38. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1518320

Bitlis Eren University
Journal of Science Editor
Bitlis Eren University Graduate Institute
Bes Minare Mah. Ahmet Eren Bulvari, Merkez Kampus, 13000 BITLIS