Progressive Collapse Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures

Abstract

This study investigates the progressive collapse (PC) behavior of three reinforced concrete (RC) structure using the Applied Element Method (AEM), focusing on corner and intermediate edge column removal. The research evaluates AEM’s effectiveness in capturing structural failure mechanisms and its reliability in progressive collapse analysis. A 3×3-bay RC frame with varying story heights (4, 7, and 10 stories) was analyzed in Extreme Loading for Structures (ELS) software. Six different scenarios were examined by varying the number of stories and the removed column locations. The numerical models incorporated TBEC 2018-compliant lap splice extensions, mesh refinement at plastic hinge locations, and slab adjustments. Two progressive collapse scenarios were considered: (1) sudden removal of a corner column and (2) removal of an intermediate edge column. The displacement response at the upper end of the removed section was monitored over 3 seconds, accounting for vibration damping. For this robust structural example, numerical results revealed that taller buildings exhibited greater transient and residual displacements, with the 10-story case reaching up to twice the displacement of the 4-story case. Moreover, intermediate edge column removal consistently led to higher displacement values than corner column removal, especially in taller structures. The results highlight the influence of column location and story height on collapse progression.

Keywords

• Applied element method (AEM)
• Progressive Collapse (PC)
• Reinforced Concrete (RC)
• Solid Mechanics
• Collapse
• Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis(NDA)

Ethical Statement

The study is complied with research and publication ethics.

Thanks

Gratitude is expressed to ASI for providing ELS.

References

1. B. R. Ellingwood, R. Smilowitz, D. O. Dusenberry, D. Duthinh, H. S. Lew, and N. J. Carino, “Best practices for reducing the potential for progressive collapse in buildings,” 2007. [Online]. Available: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=860696
2. J. X. Lu, H. Wu, and Q. Fang, “Progressive collapse of Murrah Federal Building: Revisited,” *J. Build. Eng.*, vol. 57, p. 104939, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104939.
3. N. NCSTAR, “Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers,” National Institute Standard Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/NCSTAR/ncstar1.pdf
4. J. Quiter, “Guidelines for designing fire safety in very tall buildings,” Public Review Draft, 2012.
5. L. A. Bredean and M. D. Botez, “The influence of beams design and the slabs effect on the progressive collapse resisting mechanisms development for RC framed structures,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 91, pp. 527–542, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.04.052.
6. S. Avğın, M. M. Köse, and A. Özbek, “Damage assessment of structural and geotechnical damages in Kahramanmaraş during the February 6, 2023 earthquakes,” Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., vol. 57, p. 101811, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101811.
7. F. Akar, E. Işık, F. Avcil, A. Büyüksaraç, E. Arkan, and R. İzol, “Geotechnical and structural damages caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman),” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 2165, 2024.
8. J. Yuzbasi, “Post-earthquake damage assessment: Field observations and recent developments with recommendations from the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Turkiye on February 6th, 2023 (Pazarcık M7.8 and Elbistan M7.6),” J. Earthq. Eng., pp. 1–26, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13632469.2024.2353864.

9. I. O. Dedeoglu, M. Yetkin, G. Tunc, and O. E. Ozbulut, “Evaluating earthquake-induced damage in Dogansehir, Malatya after 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence: Geotechnical and structural perspectives,” J. Build. Eng., p. 112266, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112266.
10. F. Avcil et al., “Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city,” Natural Hazards, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 2953–2991, 2024.
11. E. Işık et al., “Field reconnaissance and earthquake vulnerability of the RC buildings in Adıyaman during 2023 Turkiye earthquakes,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, p. 2860, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14072860.
12. E. Işık et al., “Structural damages in masonry buildings in Adıyaman during the Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on 06 February 2023,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 151, p. 107405, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107405.
13. O. Onat et al., “Seismic resistance and performance evaluation of masonry dwellings after the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence in Türkiye,” J. Earthq. Tsun., vol. 18, no. 4, p. 2450013, 2024, doi: 10.1142/S1793431124500131.
14. M. O. Mete and M. Y. Biyik, “Disaster management with cloud-based geographic information systems: Site selection of landfill areas after Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye earthquake sequence,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 83, p. 358, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12665-024-11674-3.
15. O. C. Celik et al., “Multidisciplinary reconnaissance investigation covering structural, geotechnical, and architectural based damage to mid-rise residential buildings following the February 6th, 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye earthquake doublets (Mw 7.8, Mw 7.6),” Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., vol. 182, p. 108738, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108738.
16. J. Yuzbasi, “Controlled demolition: Novel monitoring and experimental validation of blast-induced full-scale existing high-rise building implosion using numerical finite element simulations,” J. Civil Struct. Health Monit., pp. 1–24, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13349-024-00849-y.
17. J. Yuzbasi, “Experimental verification of full‐scale silo structure demolition: Investigating successive column removal with finite element method and progressive collapse simulation through blast load,” Struct. Concr., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 4408–4427, 2024, doi: 10.1002/suco.202400017.
18. T. P. Doğan et al., “Investigation of RC structure damages after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake in the Hatay region,” Bull. Earthq. Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 5201–5229, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10518-024-01965-2.
19. H. Ulutaş, “Investigation of the causes of soft-storey and weak-storey formations in low-and mid-rise RC buildings in Turkiye,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1308, 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14051308.
20. I. B. Karasin, “Comparative analysis of the 2023 Pazarcık and Elbistan earthquakes in Diyarbakır,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 2474, 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13102474.
21. İ. Kocaman, Ö. Mercimek, M. Gürbüz, Y. Erbaş, and Ö. Anıl, “The effect of Kahramanmaraş earthquakes on historical Malatya Yeni Mosque,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 161, p. 108310, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108310.
22. E. Işık et al., “Structural damage evaluation of mosques and minarets in Adıyaman due to the 06 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 151, p. 107345, 2023.
23. E. Işık, “Structural failures of adobe buildings during the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Turkiye) earthquakes,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 15, p. 8937, 2023.
24. StEER, “2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaras, Turkiye Earthquake Sequence Preliminary Virtual Reconnaissance Report (PVRR) Media Repository,” pp. 97–98, 2023, doi: 10.17603/ds2-mm04-xq43.
25. Y. Yu and X. Zhu, “Nonlinear dynamic collapse analysis of semi-rigid steel frames based on the finite particle method,” Engineering. Structures, vol. 118, pp. 383–393, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.063.
26. F. Dinu, I. Marginean, and D. Dubina, “Experimental testing and numerical modelling of steel moment-frame connections under column loss,” Engineering. Structures, vol. 151, pp. 861–878, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.068.
27. A. I. Zerin, A. Hosoda, H. Salem, and K. M. Amanat, “Seismic performance evaluation of masonry infilled reinforced concrete buildings utilizing verified masonry properties in applied element method,” ACT, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 227–243, 2017.
28. C. Cismasiu, A. P. Ramos, I. D. Moldovan, D. F. Ferreira, and J. B. Filho, “Applied element method simulation of experimental failure modes in RC shear walls,” Comput. Concr., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 365–374, 2017, doi: 10.12989/cac.2017.19.4.365.
29. A. Elshaer, H. Mostafa, and H. Salem, “Progressive collapse assessment of multistory reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic actions,” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 184–194, 2017.
30. A. Garofano and P. Lestuzzi, “Seismic assessment of a historical masonry building in Switzerland: the ‘Ancien Hôpital De Sion’,” *Int. J. Archit. Heritage*, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 975–992, 2016.
31. H. Salem, S. Mohssen, Y. Nishikiori, and A. Hosoda, “Numerical collapse analysis of Tsuyagawa bridge damaged by Tohoku Tsunami,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 30, no. 6, 2016.
32. H.-S. Kim and H.-H. Wee, “Separation strain for progressive collapse analysis of reinforced concrete building using applied element method,” Adv. Struct. Eng., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 437–448, 2016.
33. H. M. Salem and H. M. Helmy, “Numerical investigation of collapse of the Minnesota I-35W bridge,” Engineering Structures, vol. 59, pp. 635–645, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.022.
34. C. Grunwald et al., “Reliability of collapse simulation–Comparing finite and applied element method at different levels,” Engineering Structures, vol. 176, pp. 265–278, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.068.
35. J. Yuzbasi and H. M. Arslan, “Applied element method and finite element method for progressive collapse assessment: A comparative study on the influence of slab types, thicknesses, and damping via three incremental column removals,” Structures, vol. 73, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108358.
36. K. Meguro, “Applied element method: a new efficient tool for design of structure considering its failure behaviour,” Urban Secur., vol. 18, 2001.
37. K. Meguro and H. Tagel-Din, “Applied element method for structural analysis: theory and application for linear materials,” Struct. Eng./Earthq. Eng., JSCE, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 15, 2000.
38. J. Yuzbasi and H.R. Yerli, “Betonarme Yapıların Deprem Etkisi Altında Performans Analizlerinin Yapılması ve Güçlendirilmesi,” Çukurova Univ. Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 273–286, 2018, doi: 10.21605/cukurovaummfd.510083.
39. Işık E, Radu D, Harirchian E, Avcil F, Arkan E, Büyüksaraç A, Hadzima-Nyarko M. Failures in Reinforced-Concrete Columns and Proposals for Reinforcement Solutions: Insights from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. Buildings. 2025; 15(9):1535. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091535