Comparison of Rheological and Mechanical Performances of Repair Mortars Used in Repairing Concrete Defects

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 2115 - 2136, 31.12.2025

Sevcan Barlas Özgüven

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1708001

https://izlik.org/JA25UK55NJ

Abstract

Concrete is a durable and long-lasting building material that has a wide range of uses in the construction industry. However, over time, various defects may occur in concrete structures due to various factors. These defects can threaten the safety and aesthetics of the structure and also require maintenance and repair. Among the defects seen in concrete, problems such as cracks, breaks, surface deterioration and water leaks come to the fore. Various repair techniques and materials are used in concrete repair, depending on the type and size of the defects and the intended use of the structure. One of these materials is "repair mortar". Repair mortar is a frequently preferred solution for repairing and strengthening concrete surfaces. These mortars are compatible with the natural structure of concrete and are formulated to ensure long-term durability of the repair.
In this study, the effects of repair mortars from different manufacturers on the rheological and mechanical properties in the repair of concrete road defects were investigated. The research includes a systematic comparative evaluation of materials commonly used in the market and aims to provide scientific data for material selection. Within the scope of the methodology, basic properties of repair mortars such as fluidity, setting time and strength were measured in a laboratory environment and compared with manufacturer declarations. The results revealed that the repair mortars examined complied with the technical specifications and supported that these materials are effective and reliable solutions in concrete road repair.

Keywords

Concrete repair , Repair mortar , Rheological properties , Mechanical performance.

Ethical Statement

This article does not involve any studies with human participants or animals conducted by any of the authors.

References

• S. W. Tang, Y. Yao, C. Andrade, Z. J. Li, “Recent Durability Studies on Concrete Structure”, Cement and Concrete Research, 2015, 1, 78, 143-154.
• J. Qian, C. You, Q. Wang, H. Wang, X. Jia, “A Method for Assessing Bond Performance of Cement-Based Repair Materials”, Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 15, 68, 307-313.
• A. M.Vaysburd, P. H. Emmons, N.P. Mailvaganam, J. E. McDonald, B. Bissonnette, “Concrete Repair Technology-A Revised Approach is Needed”, Concrete İnternational, 2004, 1, 26(1), 58-65.
• A. I. Ortega, T. M. Pellicer, J. M. Adam, P. A. Calderón, “An Experimental Study on RC Columns Repaired on All Four Sides With Cementitious Mortars”, Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 10, 161, 53-62.
• J. Mirza, M. S. Mirza, R. Lapointe, “Laboratory and Field Performance Of Polymer-Modified Cement-Based Repair Mortars in Cold Climates”, Construction and Building Materials, 2002, 1, 16(6), 365-374.
• S. K. Park, D. S. Yang, “Flexural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams With Cementitious Repair Materials”, Materials and Structures, 2005, 38, 329-334.
• L. B. Waqas, S. Hocine, L. Mohamed, S. Mustafa, “A Review on The Durability of Concrete-to- Concrete Bond in Recent Rehabilitated Structures”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 44, 103315.
• T. Guo, X. Weng, C. Liu, Q.Yu, C. Zhang, Y. Li, “Evaluation of the Bonding and Fatigue Properties of an İnnovative Rapid Repair Structure for Concrete Pavement”, Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 235, 117484.
• Y. He, X. Zhang, R. D. Hooton, X. Zhang, “Effects of İnterface Roughness and İnterface Adhesion on New-to-Old Concrete Bonding”, Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 1, 151, 582-590.
• P. M. Santos, E. N. Júlio, “Comparison of Methods for Texture Assessment of Concrete Surfaces”, ACI Materials Journal, 2010, 1, 107(5).
• H. S. Al-Kurayshi, “Mathematical Extraction Equation of Horizontal Shear Transfer in Interface Between Two Concrete Members”, Civil Technical Department, Najaf Technical Institute Al-Furat Al-Awsat Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, 2015, 9(1).
• Z. Long, G. Long, Z. Tang, M. Shangguan, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, L. Peng, M. Yi, “Hydration, Strength, and Microstructure Evolution of Portland Cement-Calcium Sulphoaluminate Cement-CSH Seeds Ultra-Early Strength Cementitious System”,. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 7, 430, 136492.
• L. Courard, T. Piotrowski, A. Garbacz, “Near-to-Surface Properties Affecting Bond Strength in Concrete Repair”, Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 1(46), 73-80.
• S. Gupta, H. W. Kua, S. D. Pang, “Autonomous repair in cementitous material by combination of superabsorbent polymers and polypropylene fibres: A step towards sustainable infrastructure”, arXiv preprint arXiv, 2017, 1706.02680.
• G. F. Huseien, J. Mirza, M. Ismail, S. K. Ghoshal, A. A. Hussein, “Geopolymer Mortars as Sustainable Repair Material: A Comprehensive Review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 1, 80, 54-74.
• A. Al-Ostaz, M. Irshidat, B. Tenkhoff, P. S. Ponnapalli, “Deterioration of Bond İntegrity Between Repair Material and Concrete Due to Thermal and Mechanical İncompatibilities”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(2),136-44.
• H. Aysha, K. R. Ramsundar, M. Arun, G. Velrajkumar, “An Overview of İnterface Behavior Between Concrete to Concrete”, International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 3(2), 110-114.
• G. Xiong, J. Liu, G. Li, H. Xie, “A Way for İmproving İnterfacial Transition Zone Between Concrete Substrate and Repair Materials. Cement and Concrete Research”, 2002,1, 32(12), 1877-1881.
• A. Garbacz, L. Courard, K. Kostana, “ Characterization of Concrete Surface Roughness and İts Relation to Adhesion in Repair Systems”, Materials Characterization, 2006, 1, 56(4-5), 281-289.
• J. D. Clímaco, P. E. Regan, “Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Old and New Concrete in Structural Repairs”, Magazine of Concrete Research, 2001, 53(6), 377-390.
• B. Rabehi, Y. Ghernouti, A. Li, K. Boumchedda, “Comparative Behavior Under Compression of Concrete Columns Repaired by Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Jacketing and Ultra High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) ”, Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2014, 2, 28(22-23), 2327-2346.
• C. E. Chalioris, G. E. Thermou, S. J. Pantazopoulou, “Behaviour of Rehabilitated RC Beams with Self-Compacting Concrete Jacketing–Analytical Model and Test Results”, Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 31(55), 257-273.
• S. Feng, H. Xiao, J. Geng, “Bond Strength Between Concrete Substrate and Repair Mortar: Effect of Fibre Stiffness and Substrate Surface Roughness. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 1, 114, 103746.
• D. S. Santos, P. M. Santos, D. Dias-da-Costa, “Effect of Surface Preparation and Bonding Agent on the Concrete-to-Concrete İnterface Strength. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 1, 37, 102-110.
• W. A. Thanoon, M. S. Jaafar, M. R. Kadir, J. Noorzaei, “Repair and Structural Performance of İnitially Cracked Reinforced Concrete Slabs”, Construction and Building Materials, 2005, 1, 19(8), 595-603.
• P. M. Santos, E. N. Júlio, “Development of A Laser Roughness Analyser to Predict in Situ the Bond Strength of Concrete-to-Concrete İnterfaces”, Magazine of Concrete Research, 2008, 60(5), 329-337.
• K. Behfarnia, H. Jan-nesari, A. Mosharaf, “Studying the Bond Between Repair Materials and Concrete Substrate”, Thomas Telford Publishing, InRepair and Renovation of Concrete Structures: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK., 2005, 81-86.
• E. N. Júlio, F. A. Branco, V. D. Silva, J. F. Lourenço, “Influence of Added Concrete Compressive Strength on Adhesion to An Existing Concrete Substrate”, Building and Environment, 2006, 1, 41(12), 1934-1939.
• A. D. Espeche, J. León, “Estimation of Bond Strength Envelopes for Old-to-New Concrete İnterfaces Based on A Cylinder Splitting Test”, Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 1, 25(3), 1222-1235.
• TS 3539 EN 933-1, Agregaların Geometrik Özellikleri İçin Deneyler- Bölüm 1: Tane Büyüklüğü Dayanımı Tayini- Eleme Metodu, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2012.
• P. Chen, H. Wang, X. Zhou, S. Zhao, “Study on the Shear Performance of the Interface between Post-Cast Epoxy Resin Concrete and Ordinary Concrete”, Buildings, 2024, 10, 14(9), 2852.
• TS EN 12350-6, Beton-Taze Beton Deneyleri-Bölüm 6: Yoğunluk, Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2010.
• K. Yang, S. Hwang, “Shear Stress-Relative Slip Relationship at Concrete Interfaces”, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016, 6475161. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6475161.
• B. Wang, S. Xu, F. Liu, “Evaluation of Tensile Bonding Strength Between UHTCC Repair Materials and Concrete Substrate”, Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 1, 112, 595-606.
• ASTM C496/C496M-17, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017.
• O. Río, C. Andrade, D. Izquierdo, C. Alonso, “Behavior of Patch-Repaired Concrete Structural Elements Under İncreasing Static Loads to Flexural Failure”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2005, 17(2), 168-177.
• A. M. Neville, “Properties of Concrete”, 4th. London Pearson Education Limited, 2011, 443(846), 444.
• D. P. Bentz, E. J. Garboczi, “Three-Dimensional Computer Simulation Of Portland Cement Hydration And Microstructure Development”, Journal of The American Ceramic Society, 2000, 83(1), 3-14.
• P. K. Mehta, , P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, (4th ed.), Mcraw-Hill Education. (2014).
• M. C. Juenger, R. Snellings, S. A. Bernal, “Supplementary Cementitious Materials: New Sources, Characterization, and Performance İnsights. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 1, 122, 257-273.
• J. Skocek, M. N. Soutsos, “The Effect of Cement Type on Early Age Properties of Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(9), 753–758.
• W. L. Baloch, H. Siad, M. Lachemi, M. Sahmaran, “A Review on The Durability Of Concrete-to-Concrete Bond in Recent Rehabilitated Structures”, Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 1;44, 103315.
• I. C. Karakasis, C. G. Papanicolaou, T. C. Triantafillou, “Residual Textile Reinforced Mortar‐to‐Concrete Bond After Exposure to Harsh Environments”, Structural Concrete, 2024.
• Y. Gao, Z. Li, “The Effect of Curing Conditions on The Early-Age Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Of Cement-Based Materials. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 79, 100-112.
• S. Saha, S. Ghosh, “Hydration Kinetics and Microstructure Evolution of Portland Cement Paste: A Review”, Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 75, 33-43.
• N. R. Antonuk, A. Krisogasa, “Repair Composite Adhesion Strength: A Comparison of Testing Methods”, Applied Sciences, 2022, 14(22), 10749.
• K. Moskalova, S. Hedulian, N. Antoniuk, M. ŠercerRepair, “Composite Adhesion Strength: A Comparison of Testing Methods”, Applied Sciences, 2024, 20, 14(22), 10749.
• P. A. Basheer, L. Basheer, D. J. Cleland, A. E. Long, “Surface Treatments For Concrete: Assessmentmethods and Reported Performance”, Construction and Building Materials, 1997, 1;11(7-8), 413-429.