Panorama of 20 Years in Waste Management: Türkiye's Changing Disposal Methods and the Bitlis Example

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 2192 - 2213, 31.12.2025

Çiğdem Özer

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1719185

https://izlik.org/JA74NL58MS

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of municipal solid waste management in Türkiye between 2002 and 2022, using Bitlis province as a local case. Data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) show that primitive practices such as open burning and discharge into water bodies have been almost entirely abandoned, replaced by sanitary landfilling and licensed company operations. Nevertheless, landfilling still accounted for 67% of total waste in 2022, posing environmental risks including leachate and methane emissions. Recycling rose from 5–7% in 2002 to 13% in 2022, though this remains far below the EU average of 45–50%. At the same time, per capita daily waste generation declined by 2.1% annually, reflecting the impact of prevention policies. Economic analysis indicates that disposal and transportation costs made up about 44.5% of Türkiye’s environmental protection expenditures in 2022, equal to 0.65% of GDP. Statistical tests confirmed significant declines in high-risk methods such as burial and water discharge, while recycling and energy recovery showed no consistent upward trend. In Bitlis, uncontrolled dumping and open burning, once common in the early 2000s, have been replaced by sanitary landfilling and licensed disposal since the opening of a regional facility in 2018. Overall, findings reveal that Türkiye has made notable progress in reducing harmful disposal methods and expanding infrastructure. However, stronger investments in recycling, composting, and energy recovery are essential to mitigate climate impacts, strengthen the circular economy, and align with European Union waste management standards.

Keywords

Solid waste , Bitlis , Türkiye , Waste policy , The Mann-Kendall , Sen's slope.

Ethical Statement

The study is complied with research and publication ethics.

References

• O. Gokkurt Baki and O. N. ERGUN, “Municipal Solid Waste Management: Circular Economy Evaluation in Turkey,” Environ. Manag. Sustain. Dev., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 79, 2021, doi: 10.5296/emsd.v10i2.18448.
• Ö. Apaydin and G. S. Akçay Han, “Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Collection Methods Focusing on Zero-Waste Management Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 17, p. 13184, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/SU151713184/S1.
• TUIK, “TÜİK Kurumsal,” Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. p. 2, 2021. Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Atik-Istatistikleri-2022-49570
• EEA, “Municipal Waste Management in Turkey,” 2022. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-0198-6.ch018.
• “TÜİK - Veri Portalı.” Accessed: May 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/
• N. G. Turan, S. Çoruh, A. Akdemir, and O. N. Ergun, “Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey,” Waste Manag., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 465–469, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2008.06.004.
• T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, “Ulusal Atık Yönetimi ve Eylem Planı 2023,” 2023.
• G. Grimaud, B. Laratte, and N. Perry, “To transport waste or transport recycling plant: Insights from life-cycle analysis,” Mater. Tech., vol. 105, no. 5–6, 2017, doi: 10.1051/mattech/2018016.
• R. Cremiato, M. L. Mastellone, C. Tagliaferri, L. Zaccariello, and P. Lettieri, “Environmental impact of municipal solid waste management using Life Cycle Assessment: The effect of anaerobic digestion, materials recovery and secondary fuels production,” Renew. Energy, vol. 124, pp. 180–188, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.06.033.
• A. Demir, A. Basturk, B. Ozkaya, and M. S. Bilgili, “Municipal Waste Management in Turkey,” in Sustainable Waste Management Challenges in Developing Countries, and M. S. B. Agamuthu Pariatamby, Fauziah Shahul Hamid, Ed., Hershey: IGI Global, 2020, pp. 441–465. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-0198-6.CH018.
• H. Dinçer, S. Yüksel, S. Eti, Y. Gökalp, A. Mikhaylov, and Z. Karpyn, “Effective waste management in service industry: Fuzzy-based modelling approach for strategic decision-making,” Waste Manag. Res., 2024, doi: 10.1177/0734242X241242682.
• R. Horta Arduin et al., “Influence of scope definition in recycling rate calculation for European e-waste extended producer responsibility,” Waste Manag., vol. 84, pp. 256–268, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2018.12.002.
• G. Öner, H. Akgün, M. K. Koçkar, and A. Arslan Kelam, “Municipal landfill site selection using TOPSIS methodology: A case study for Polatlı, Ankara, Türkiye,” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 1–26, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1007/S10064-025-04146-W/FIGURES/18.
• I. Kamdar, S. Ali, A. Bennui, K. Techato, and W. Jutidamrongphan, “Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: A case study from Songkhla, Thailand,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 149, pp. 220–235, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.05.027.
• “Municipal waste statistics - Statistics Explained - Eurostat.” Accessed: Jun. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Municipal_waste_statistics
• “OECD Data Explorer • Waste - Municipal waste: generation and treatment.” Accessed: Jun. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?df[ds]=DisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_MUNW%40DF_MUNW&df[ag]=OECD.ENV.EPI&dq=.A.MUNICIPAL.T&pd=2015%2C&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false
• M. Hashim, N. Nayan, D. L. Setyowati, Z. M. Said, H. Mahat, and Y. Saleh, “Analysis of Water Quality Trends Using the Mann-Kendall Test and Sen’s Estimator of Slope in a Tropical River Basin,” Pollution, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 933–942, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.22059/POLL.2021.325794.1118.
• A. Muhammet BANAZILI, “Kati Atik Kavramina Küresel Bir Bakiş Ve Kati Atik Yönetimi Üzerine Politika Önerileri,” G.Ü. İslahiye İİBF Uluslararası E-Dergi, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 16–27, Dec. 2024, Accessed: Jun. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iiibfud/issue/88745/1596559
• A. M. Troschinetz and J. R. Mihelcic, “Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries,” Waste Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 915–923, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2008.04.016.
• D. C. Wilson, C. Velis, and C. Cheeseman, “Role of informal sector recycling in waste management in developing countries,” Habitat Int., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 797–808, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2005.09.005.
• F. C. Mihai and C. Ingrao, “Assessment of biowaste losses through unsound waste management practices in rural areas and the role of home composting,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 172, pp. 1631–1638, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.163.
• N. Ferronato and V. Torretta, “Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2019, Vol. 16, Page 1060, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 1060, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/IJERPH16061060.
• “Waste generation in Europe | European Environment Agency’s home page.” Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/waste-generation-and-decoupling-in-europe
• “Waste management in Europe: how can we improve? - Ecostar.” Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ecostar.eu.com/waste-management-in-europe-how-can-we-improve/
• D. Hoornweg, “A Global Review of Solid Waste Management,” A Glob. Rev., vol. 44, no. January 2012, pp. 44–55, 2017.
• A. Pires, G. Martinho, and N. Bin Chang, “Solid waste management in European countries: A review of systems analysis techniques,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1033–1050, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2010.11.024.
• A. U. Zaman and S. Lehmann, “The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city,’” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 50, pp. 123–132, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2012.11.041.
• “Global Waste Management Outlook 2024 | UNEP - UN Environment Programme.” Accessed: Jun. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.unep.org/resources/global-waste-management-outlook-2024
• “What a Waste.” Accessed: Jun. 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/what-a-waste/
• E. Balci, S. Balci, and A. Sofuoglu, “Multi-purpose reverse logistics network design for medical waste management in a megacity: Istanbul, Turkey,” Environ. Syst. Decis., vol. 42, no. 3, p. 372, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10669-022-09873-Z.
• “TÜİK Kurumsal.” Accessed: Jun. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/bulten/index?p=environmental-protection-expenditure-statistics-2021-45520&utm_source
• H. Burçin and H. Henden¸ Henden¸solt, “Evaluation of the Zero Waste Project in Istanbul District Municipalities from the Perspective of Sustainable Urban Planning,” Sustain. 2023, Vol. 15, Page 11896, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 11896, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/SU151511896.
• H. M. Ay and A. Söylemez, “Belediye Hi̇zmetleri İçi̇nde Katı Atık Yöneti̇mi̇ni̇n Önemi̇ Ve Konya Büyükşehi̇r Beledi̇yesi̇ Örneği̇,” Toplum Ekon. ve Yönetim Derg., vol. 4, no. Özel, pp. 273–292, 2023, doi: 10.58702/teyd.1357353.
• “Environment at a Glance Indicators,” Environ. a Glance Indic., Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1787/AC4B8B89-EN.
• Y. Avşar, “Atık Yönetim i Stratejisi Olarak ‘ Sıfır Atık Projesi ’ ve Türkiye ’ deki Uygulama Örnekleri,” Türk Yönetim ve Ekon. Araştırmaları Derg., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 82–93, 2024.
• S. Dağıdır and H. Yaylı, “Türkiye ’ nin Katı Atık Yönetiminin AB İlerleme Raporları Bağlamında İncelenmesi Exploration of Turkey ’ s Solid Waste Management in the Context of EU Progress Reports,” pp. 21–38, 2024.
• E. Union, “Amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste,” Off. J. Eur. Union, pp. 1–28, 2024.
• European Parliament, “EU Circular Economy Package: Four Legislative Proposals on Waste,” vol. 593, no. March, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Briefing-573936-Circular-economy-package-FINAL.pdf
• “The European Green Deal — European Environment Agency.” Accessed: Oct. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/com-2019-640-final
• A. S. E. Yay, “Yaşam döngüsü analizinin ambalaj atıklarının yönetiminde kullanılması.,” Sak. Univ. J. Sci. / Sak. Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1008–1017, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.16984/SAUFENBILDER.300851.
• Ş. ve İ. D. B. Çevre, Atık Yönetimi Genel Esaslarına İlişkin Yönetmelik. Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.lexpera.com.tr/resmi-gazete/metin/atik-yonetimi-genel-esaslarina-iliskin-yonetmelik-26927
• Bitlis İl Özel İdaresi, “Bitlis İli 2022 Yili Faaliyet Raporu,” 2022.
• T. Can, Orhan, A. D. Yetiş, L. Gazigil, M. M. Tütün, and R. Yetiş, “Bitlis Merkez, Tatvan ve Güroymak İlçeleri İçin Sosyo-Ekonomik Gelişmişlik ve Kati Atik Miktarlari Arasindaki İlişki,” no. January 2015, 2014, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3995.6645.
• G. Akinci, E. D. Guven, and G. Gok, “Evaluation of waste management options and resource conservation potentials according to the waste characteristics and household income: A case study in Aegean Region, Turkey,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 58, pp. 114–124, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2011.11.005.
• “You searched for Turkey - United Nations Sustainable Development.” Accessed: Oct. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/?s=Turkey