Correlation-Based Adaptive Filtering Performance Driven by Signal Decomposition Methods for EEG Signals of Individuals with Severe Motor Disabilities

Year 2026, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 13 - 29, 24.03.2026

Esra Kaya , Ismail Sarıtas

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1726313

https://izlik.org/JA57SL44LC

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are obtained from the surface of the scalp through a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) and show the activity of brain regions. EEG signals are useful tools for people, especially those who have severe motor disabilities for an improved quality of life. Because of their noisy nature caused by a small movement of the head, eye blink, or even breathing, it is extremely hard to extract meaningful information from EEG signals. Thus, it is imperative to filter EEG signals without losing their essential parts. While filtering, the concept of adaptivity comes in handy because of its flexible nature to preserve important information. In this context, a novel approach that applies Wavelet Decomposition (WD), Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), or Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) methods to filter EEG signals adaptively based on correlation was proposed. The performances of developed methods were calculated based on the accuracies of binary classifications of five different labels by using machine learning classifiers and compared with an Elliptic Bandpass Filter. The study shows that the proposed adaptively implemented VMD is the most useful filtering method for EEG signals, providing the best performance with 76.1% subject-wise accuracy for binary classification of word association and feet motor imagery and an average accuracy of 70.4% for all binary classifications using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. The results show that correlation is an efficient tool to adaptively implement signal decomposition methods as filters by preserving meaningful information more successfully than an Elliptic Bandpass Filter.

Keywords

Adaptive Filter , BCI , Correlation , EEG , Elliptic , EMD , Motor Disabilities , Signal Decomposition , VMD , Wavelet

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that this study complies with Research and Publication Ethics.

References

• K. Belwafi, R. Djemal, F. Ghaffari, and O. Romain, “An adaptive EEG filtering approach to maximize the classification accuracy in motor imagery,” in 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB), IEEE, 2014, pp. 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCMB.2014.7020704
• P. Gaur et al., “A Sliding Window Common Spatial Pattern for Enhancing Motor Imagery Classification in EEG-BCI,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3051996
• E. Estrada et al., “Wavelet-based EEG denoising for automatic sleep stage classification,” in 2011 21st Int. Conf. on Electrical Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP), IEEE, 2011, pp. 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIELECOMP.2011.5749325
• Z. A. A. Alyasseri et al., “EEG signals denoising using optimal wavelet transform hybridized with efficient metaheuristic methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 10584–10605, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962658
• T. Suhail et al., “Performance Analysis of Mother Wavelet Functions and Thresholding Methods for Denoising EEG Signals during Cognitive Tasks,” in 2020 Int. Conf. on Power, Instrumentation, Control and Computing (PICC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PICC51425.2020.9362377
• A. W. Pise and P. P. Rege, “Comparative Analysis of Various Filtering Techniques for Denoising EEG Signals,” in 2021 6th Int. Conf. for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CT51068.2021.9417984
• S. Lahmiri and M. Boukadoum, “Physiological signal denoising with variational mode decomposition and weighted reconstruction after DWT thresholding,” in 2015 IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), IEEE, 2015, pp. 806–809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS.2015.7168756
• P. Gaur et al., “A multi-class EEG-based BCI classification using multivariate empirical mode decomposition based filtering and Riemannian geometry,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 95, pp. 201–211, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.11.007
• S. Taran and V. Bajaj, “Clustering variational mode decomposition for identification of focal EEG signals,” IEEE Sensors Lett., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2018.2872415 C. Kaur et al., “EEG Signal denoising using hybrid approach of Variational Mode Decomposition and wavelets for depression,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 65, p. 102337, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102337
• R. Scherer et al., “Individually adapted imagery improves brain-computer interface performance in end-users with disability,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 5, p. e0123727, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123727
• G. Özmen and S. Özşen, “A new denoising method for fMRI based on weighted three-dimensional wavelet transform,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 263–276, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2995-7
• Y. Liu et al., “Variational mode decomposition denoising combined the detrended fluctuation analysis,” Signal Process., vol. 125, pp. 349–364, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.02.011
• K. Dragomiretskiy and D. Zosso, “Variational mode decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 531–544, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675
• J. Lian et al., “Adaptive variational mode decomposition method for signal processing based on mode characteristic,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 107, pp. 53–77, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.01.019
• N. E. Huang and Z. Wu, “A review on Hilbert‐Huang transform: Method and its applications to geophysical studies,” Rev. Geophys., vol. 46, no. 2, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000228
• G. Rilling, P. Flandrin, and P. Goncalves, “On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms,” in IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 8–11. [N. ur Rehman and H. Aftab, “Multivariate variational mode decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 23, pp. 6039–6052, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.2951223
• Y. Ma et al., “Nonlinear dynamical analysis of sleep electroencephalography using fractal and entropy approaches,” Sleep Med. Rev., vol. 37, pp. 85–93, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.01.003
• U. R. Acharya et al., “Nonlinear dynamics measures for automated EEG-based sleep stage detection,” Eur. Neurol., vol. 74, no. 5–6, pp. 268–287, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441975
• M. Peker, “An efficient sleep scoring system based on EEG signal using complex-valued machine learning algorithms,” Neurocomputing, vol. 207, pp. 165–177, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.04.049
• P. Flandrin, “Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fractional Brownian motion,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 910–917, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.119751
• J. Istas and G. Lang, “Quadratic variations and estimation of the local Hölder index of a Gaussian process,” Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 407–436, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0246-0203(97)80099-4
• B. Hjorth, “EEG analysis based on time domain properties,” Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 306–310, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(70)90143-4
• C.-H. C. Liao et al., “Fall detection by a svm-based cloud system with motion sensors,” in Adv. Technol., Embedded and Multimedia for Human-centric Comput., Springer, 2014, pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7262-5_5
• Ö. Türk et al., “Classification of mental task EEG records using Hjorth parameters,” in 2017 25th Signal Process. and Commun. Appl. Conf. (SIU), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2017.7960608
• N. Samiee and S. H. Sardouie, “A Transfer Learning Algorithm Based on CSP Regularizations of Recorded EEG for Between-Subject Classification,” in 2019 26th Natl. and 4th Int. Iranian Conf. on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME), IEEE, 2019, pp. 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBME49163.2019.9030388
• F. P. Kalaganis et al., “A Riemannian geometry approach to reduced and discriminative covariance estimation in brain computer interfaces,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 245–255, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2912066
• N. Samiee et al., “A Transfer Learning Algorithm Based on Linear Regression for Between-Subject Classification of EEG Data,” in 2020 25th Int. Comput. Conf., Comput. Soc. Iran (CSICC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSICC49403.2020.9050060
• M. C. Corsi et al., “Functional connectivity ensemble method to enhance BCI performance (FUCONE),” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2022.3154885
• F. Lotte and C. Guan, “Regularizing common spatial patterns to improve BCI designs: unified theory and new algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 355–362, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2010.2082539
• R. Zhang et al., “Z-score linear discriminant analysis for EEG based brain-computer interfaces,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, p. e74433, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074433
• M. H. Alomari et al., “Wavelet-based feature extraction for the analysis of EEG signals associated with imagined fists and feet movements,” Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 17–27, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/cis.v7n2p17
• J. Kevric and A. Subasi, “Comparison of signal decomposition methods in classification of EEG signals for motor-imagery BCI system,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 31, pp. 398–406, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.09.007
• B. Abdi-Sargezeh et al., “EEG artifact rejection by extracting spatial and spatio-spectral common components,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 358, p. 109182, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109182
• Keerthi Krishnan, K., & Soman, K. P. “CNN based classification of motor imaginary using variational mode decomposed EEG-spectrum image”. Biomedical engineering letters, 11(3), 235-247, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-021-00190-z
• Velasco, Ivan, et al. "Motor imagery EEG signal classification with a multivariate time series approach." BioMedical Engineering OnLine 22(1), 29, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01079-x
• Kardam, V. S., Taran, S., & Pandey, A. “Motor imagery tasks based electroencephalogram signals classification using data-driven features.” Neuroscience Informatics, 3(2), 100128, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuri.2023.100128
• Fu, R., Han, M., Tian, Y., & Shi, P. “Improvement motor imagery EEG classification based on sparse common spatial pattern and regularized discriminant analysis.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 343, 108833, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108833
• Y. Gu and L. Hua, “A Novel Smart Motor Imagery Intention Human-Computer Interaction Model Using Extreme Learning Machine and EEG Signals,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 15, p. 685119, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.685119.