Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic
Abstract
Plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), bio-photovoltaic arrays, and hybrid electrochemical platforms are all examples of new types of renewable energy systems that use living plants to generate a small but steady amount of electricity. These systems depend on the metabolic interactions between roots, soil microorganisms, and materials that can conduct electricity. But their performance is always uncertain because changes in the environment, biological variability, and limits on measurements make things less clear than classical deterministic models can show. Fuzzy logic as it is used now can show different levels of truth, but it combines ignorance and vagueness into one value, making it harder to understand in complicated natural systems. This study presents a conceptual and mathematical model based on neutrosophic logic that aims to define and measure uncertainty in plant-based electricity generation. Neutrosophic triplets (T,I,F) show key environmental and biological factors like solar radiation, soil moisture, temperature suitability, and plant vitality. This lets truth, indeterminacy, and falsity be shown separately. A rule-based inference mechanism puts these triplets together to make an interval-based guess about how much electricity will be produced. The work lays out the theoretical framework for this method and makes it clear how it can be used to model environmental energy. In general, the framework shows how neutrosophic reasoning gives us a better way to understand the uncertainty that comes with living green energy systems.
Keywords
- Neutrosophic logic
- Environmental uncertainty
- Plant microbial fuel cell
- Bio-electrochemical modeling
- Renewable energy
- Weak energy sources
Ethical Statement
The study is complied with research and publication ethics.
References
- D. P. Strik, H. V. Hamelers, and C. J. Buisman, “Solar energy powered microbial fuel cell with a reversible bioelectrode,” Environmental science & technology, 2020, 44(1), pp. 532-537.
- A. Timmers, D.P. Strik, H.V. Hamelers and C. J. Buisman, “Long-term performance of a plant microbial fuel cell with Spartina anglica,” Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2010, 86(3), pp. 973-981.
- W. Cui, S. Espley, W. Liang, S. Yi and X. Dong, “Microbial fuel cells for power generation by treating mine tailings: recent advances and emerging trends,” Sustainability, 2025, 17(2), 466.
- B. E. Logan, B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schröder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, W. Verstraete, and K. Rabaey, “Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology,” Environmental science & technology, 2006, 40(17), pp. 5181-5192.
- S. Son and S.P. Jung, “Trends and prospects of sediment microbial fuel cells as sustainable aquatic ecosystem remediation technology,” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 2022, 44(11), pp. 468-492.
- F. T. Kabutey, Q. Zhao, L. Wei, J. Ding, P. Antwi, F. K. Quashie, W. Wang, “An overview of plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs): Configurations and applications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 110, pp. 402-414.
- R. Nitisoravut and R. Regmi, “Plant microbial fuel cells: A promising biosystems engineering approach for energy generation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 76, pp. 81–89.
- R. Shaikh, A. Rizvi, M. Quraishi, S. Pandit, A. S. Mathuriya, P. K. Gupta, J. Singh and R. Prasad, “Bioelectricity production using plant–microbial fuel cell: present state of art,” South African Journal of Botany, 140, 2021, pp. 393–408.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Bioelectronic
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
March 24, 2026
Submission Date
November 3, 2025
Acceptance Date
December 18, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 1
APA
Topal, S., Kireçci, O. A., & Kocaman, B. (2026). Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(1), 360-372. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333
AMA
1.Topal S, Kireçci OA, Kocaman B. Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;15(1):360-372. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333
Chicago
Topal, Selçuk, Oğuz Ayhan Kireçci, and Behçet Kocaman. 2026. “Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15 (1): 360-72. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333.
EndNote
Topal S, Kireçci OA, Kocaman B (March 1, 2026) Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15 1 360–372.
IEEE
[1]S. Topal, O. A. Kireçci, and B. Kocaman, “Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic”, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 360–372, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333.
ISNAD
Topal, Selçuk - Kireçci, Oğuz Ayhan - Kocaman, Behçet. “Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 15/1 (March 1, 2026): 360-372. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333.
JAMA
1.Topal S, Kireçci OA, Kocaman B. Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026;15:360–372.
MLA
Topal, Selçuk, et al. “Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic”. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 15, no. 1, Mar. 2026, pp. 360-72, doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333.
Vancouver
1.Selçuk Topal, Oğuz Ayhan Kireçci, Behçet Kocaman. Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2026 Mar. 1;15(1):360-72. doi:10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333