Investigation of Gifted Students’ Perceptions Towards Air Pollution, One of the Socio-Scientific Issues

Abstract

This study, which examined gifted students’ perceptions towards air pollution, was conducted within the scope of phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods. The research was conducted with 23 gifted students. Data were collected with the Draw -Write-Tell technique. The data were collected two hours a week for a total of eight hours. In the first and second weeks, data were collected on the causes of air pollution, and in the third and fourth weeks, data were collected on the solution of air pollution. The inductive content analysis method was used to analyze the data. According to gifted students, smoke from the chimneys of factories and residences, gases emitted from car exhausts, forest fires, cutting down forests/trees, industrial and domestic wastes, use of non-renewable energy sources, uncontrolled fires, ship wastes, water pollution, airplane fuels, running generators, and smoking cause air pollution. In addition, they think that installing filters on car exhausts and residential/factory chimneys, afforestation, not cutting down forests, limiting the use of cosmetic products or not using these products, recycling, using renewable environmentally friendly energy sources, reducing or eliminating smoking, using public transportation, and using bicycles instead of motor vehicles can be reasonable solutions to reduce air pollution.

Keywords

• Socio-scientific issues
• air pollution
• gifted students.

References

1. Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge are predictors of constructing different types of arguments on socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
2. Behal, A. & Behal, D. (2020). Smell good, breathe bad: How scented products add to air pollution. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/environment/smell-good-breathe-bad-how-scented-products-add-to-air-pollution-74501
3. Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan RA, Grosse et al. (2012). International Agency for Research on Cancer monograph working group. Carcinogenicity of diesel-engine and gasoline-engine exhausts and some nitroarenes. Lancet Oncol, 13, 663–664. https://doi:10.1016/ S1470-2045(12)70280-2
4. Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Science teachers’ perceptions, challenges and coping strategies in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
6. D'Amato, G., & Akdis, C. (2020). Global warming, climate change, air pollution, and allergies. Authorea Preprints.
7. Dimitriou, A., & Christidou, V. (2007). Pupils' understanding of air pollution. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656103
8. Dinç, E. & Üztemur, S. (2017). Investigating student teachers’ conceptions of social studies through the multidimensional structure of the epistemological beliefs. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6), 2093-2142. https://doi:10.12738/estp.2017.6.0429

9. Elsaid, A. M., & Ahmed, M. S. (2021). Indoor air quality strategies for air-conditioning and ventilation systems with the spread of the global coronavirus (COVID-19) Epidemic: Improvements and recommendations. Environmental Research, p. 199, 111314. https://doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111314
10. Gonzalez-Martin, J., Kraakman, N. J. R., Perez, C., Lebrero, R., & Munoz, R. (2021). A state–of-the-art review on indoor air pollution and strategies for indoor air pollution control. Chemosphere, 262, 128376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128376
11. Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place‐based socioscientific issues instruction on students' contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
12. Jickling, B. (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy: Revisited. The Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960309603496
13. Julie, D. (1998). Young children, environmental education, and the future. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26, 117–123.
14. Kilicoglu G., & Yilmaz, M. A. (2021). Opinions of secondary school students on global warming. Journal of Global Health & Natural Sciences, 4(2), 102-112.
15. Kirilmazkaya, G. (2022). Secondary school students' views on environment and environmental problems. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(1), 1-11.
16. Landrigan, P. J. (2017). Air pollution and health. The Lancet Public Health. https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S2468-2667%2816%2930023-8
17. Mandrikas, A., Stavrou, D., & Skordoulis, C. (2017). Teaching air pollution in an authentic context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 238-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9675-8
18. Meador, K., S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science suggestions for primary teachers, Gifted Child Today.
19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
20. Myers, G., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2004). School students' ideas about air pollution: Knowledge and attitudes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 22(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514042000290868
21. Özarslan, M. (2022). Environmental problems according to the gifted and talented students and their solution proposals: A qualitative research. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 11(4), 201-216.
22. Özarslan, M., Çetin, G., & Yıldırım, O. (2017). Parental views of gifted and talented students about biology projects in science and art centre. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 1411-1436.
23. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications
24. Payne, P., G. (2006). Environmental education and curriculum theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 37(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.37.2.25-35
25. Rakwongwan, U., Archankul, A., Rujivan, S., & Bastian, P. (2021). The numerical visualization of air pollution propagation from a single generator to an observed area. Chiang Mai Journal of Science, 48(5), 1430-1443.
26. Sadatshojaie, A., & Rahimpour, M. R. (2020). CO2 emission and air pollution (volatile organic compounds, etc.) are related to problems causing climate change. Current trends and future developments on (bio-) membranes, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816778-6.00001-1
27. Sarac, H., & Özarslan, M. (2018). Environmental attitude levels of gifted and talented students and analysis of metacognitive in terms of some variables. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 6(11), 65-87. . https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.364377
28. Smutny, J. F. & Von-Fremd, S. E. (2004). Differentiating for the young child: Teaching strategies across the content areas (K-3). Corwin Press.
29. Tanik-Onal, N. (2021). Environmental education for gifted students. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education, 43, 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10474-7
30. Thornber, J., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E. (1999). School students' ideas about air pollution: Hindrance or help for learning? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009481521719
31. Toren, M., & Mollahasanoglu, H. (2022). Investigating electric motors in electric and hybrid vehicles and estimating changes in CO2 emissions: A sample of Turkiye. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(3), 1082-1097. https://doi: 10.31202/ecjse.1107454
32. Uyanik, G. (2017). Opinions towards environmental pollution of primary school students. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 14(1), 1574–1600. http://doi.org/10.23891/ efdyyu.2017.56
33. Varaden, D., King, H., Rushton, E., & Barratt, B. (2021). Engaging primary students with the issue of air pollution through citizen science: lessons to be learned. Journal of Emergent Science, 21, 30-36.
34. Wahono, B., Chang, C. Y., & Khuyen, N. T. T. (2021). Teaching socio-scientific issues through integrated STEM education: an effective practical averment from Indonesian science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 43(16), 2663-2683. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1983226
35. World Health Organization (2016). Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241511353
36. World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. https://www.who.int/news/item/25-03-2014-7-million-premature-deaths-annually-linked-to-air pollution#:~:text=25%20March%202014%20%7C%20Geneva%20%2D%20In,result%20of%20air%20pollution%20exposure.
37. Yarragunta, Y., Srivastava, S., Mitra, D., & Chandola, H. C. (2020). Influence of forest fire episodes on the distribution of gaseous air pollutants over Uttarakh and, India. GI Science & Remote Sensing, 57(2), 190–206. https://doi:10.1080/15481603.2020.171210