Ebeveyn Medya Aracılığı Rolleri: Ebeveyn ve Çocuğa İlişkin Değişkenlerin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı ebeveynlerin medya aracılık rollerini ebeveynlerle (cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu ve çocuk sayısı) ve çocukla ilgili değişkenler (cinsiyet ve doğum sırası) açısından incelemektir. Örneklem çocukları 60-72 ay aralığında olan ve erken çocukluk eğitimi alan 596 ebeveynden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada tarama modeli kullanılarak nicel araştırma yöntemi benimsenmiştir. Veriler, 'Erken Çocukluk Medya Aracılık Ölçeği' ve 'Demografik Bilgi Formu' uygulanarak elde edilmiştir. Veri analizinde bağımsız örneklem t-testi ve tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, tüm değişkenler arasında medya aracılık rollerinde anlamlı bir fark olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Genç, yüksek eğitimli anneler sıklıkla kısıtlayıcı-destekleyici bir rol benimserken, ilk doğan çocuklar, daha az çocuğu olan aileler ve yüksek eğitimli anneler aktif-destekleyici bir rol sergilemektedir. Düşük eğitimli ve çok çocuklu annelerin kısıtlayıcı-sınırlayıcı bir rol sergileme olasılığı daha yüksekken, daha az çocuğu olan annelerin aktif-yorumlayıcı bir rol benimseme olasılığı daha yüksektir. Erkek çocuklarda aktif-sınırlayıcı rol baskındır. Bulgular güncel literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

• erken çocukluk eğitimi
• medya aracılığı
• ebeveyn medya rolleri

Parental Media Mediation Roles: An Examination in Terms of Parental and Child-Related Variables

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the media mediation roles of parents in relation to parental variables (gender, age, education status and number of children) and child-related variables (gender and birth order). The sample consisted of 596 parents of preschool children. The study employed a quantitative research method using survey model. The data were obtained through the application of the 'Early Childhood Media Mediation Scale' and 'Demographic Information Form'. The data analysis involved independent samples t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The findings revealed a significant difference in media mediation roles across all variables. Young, highly educated mothers often adopt a restrictive-supportive role, whereas firstborn children, families that have fewer-children, and highly educated mothers exhibit an active-supportive role. Low-educated and multi-child mothers are more likely to exhibit a restrictive-limitative role, whereas mothers with fewer children are more likely to adopt an active-interpretive role. With regard to boys, the active-limitative role has prevaled. The findings have been discussed in light of the current literature.

Keywords

• early childhood education
• media mediation
• parental mediation role

References

1. Alkan, R. Ü., Aslan, A., Turgut, Y. E., & Kurşun, E. (2021). Factors affecting parental mediation strategies in children’s technology use: A systematic review. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 9(18), 702-723. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.925859
2. Aslan, A., & Turgut, Y. E. (2024). Parental mediation in Turkey: The use of mobile devices in early childhood. E-Learning and Digital Media, 21(5), 444-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530231167651
3. Aierbe, A., Oregui, E., & Bartau, I. (2019). Video games, parental mediation and gender socialization. Digital Education Review, 36, 100-116. http://greav.ub.edu/der/
4. Barkin, S., Ip, E., Richardson, I., Klinepeter, S., Finch, S., & Krcmar, M. (2006). Parental media mediation styles for children aged 2 to 11 years. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(4), 395-401. https://doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.4.395
5. Başaran, F. (2004). Geçiş döneminde Türkiye: Değişim, gelişim, tutumlar ve değerler. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
6. Bastırmacı, Ş. (2022). 48–72 aylık çocukların annelerinin, ebeveynlik tutumları ile ebeveyn- çocuk medya aracılık rolleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between parent attitudes and parental media mediation roles of 48–72 months old children’s mothers] (Thesis no. 755171) [Master’s thesis, İstanbul Medipol University]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/
7. Beyens, I., & Beullens, K. (2017). Parent–child conflict about children’s tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2075-2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816655099
8. Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2019). Developmental trajectories of parental mediation across early and middle childhood. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 226-250. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy016

9. Bostancı, S., & Çakır, R. (2022). Erken çocukluk çağında çocuğu olan ebeveynlerin, çocuklarına medya kullandırmadaki aracılıkları ve dijital ebeveynlik farkındalıklarının incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 86-116. https://doi.org/10.52797/tujped.1192163
10. Brito, R., Francisco, R., Dias, P., & Chaudron, S. (2017). Family dynamics in digital homes: The role played by parental mediation in young children’s digital practices around 14 European countries. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(4), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-017-9431-0
11. Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J., & Salvanes, K. G. (2005). The more the merrier? The effect of family size and birth order on children's education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 669-700. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.583144
12. Budak, K. S., & Işıkoğlu, N. (2022). Development of children’s digital play addiction tendency and parental mediation scales. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 55(3), 673-720. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.939653
13. Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2411-2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168
14. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x
15. Condeza, R., Herrada-Hidalgo, N., & Barros-Friz, C. (2019). Nuevos roles parentales de mediación: percepciones de los padres sobre la relación de sus hijos con múltiples pantallas. El Profesional de la Información (EPI), 28(4), 1699-2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI
16. Çalhan, C., & Göksu, İ. (2024). An effort to understand parents’ media mediation roles and early childhood children's digital game addiction tendency: A descriptive correlational survey study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12544-y
17. Chaudron, S., Beutel, M.E., Černikova, M., Donoso Navarette, V., Dreier, M., Fletcher-Watson, B., Heikkilä, A.-S., Kontríková, V., Korkeamäki, R.-L., Livingstone, S., Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., Micheli, M., Milesi, D., Müller, K.W., Myllylä-Nygård, T., Niska, M., Olkina, O., Ottovordemgentschenfelde, S., Plowman, L., Ribbens, W., Richardson, J., Schaack, C., Shlyapnikov, V., Šmahel, D., Soldatova, G. and Wölfling, K. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology: A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. JRC 93239/EUR 27052.
18. Collier, K. M., Coyne, S. M., Rasmussen, E. E., Hawkins, A. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Erickson, S. E., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2016). Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 798. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000108
19. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
20. Duek, C., & Moguillansky, M. (2020). Children, digital screens and family: parental mediation practices and gender. Comunicacao e Sociedade, (37), 55-70. http://journals.openedition.org/cs/2362
21. Erşahin, K. (2019). Anne baba tutumları ile 5-7 yaş çocukların bilişsel işlemler performansı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) İstanbul Üniversitesi: İstanbul, Türkiye.
22. Ferreira, E., Ponte, C., & Castro, T. S. (2017, November). ICT and gender: Parental mediation strategies. In 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
23. Gözüm, A. İC., & Kandır, A. (2020). Developing a parental mediation scale of digital games for children. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2), 336–358. http://ijci.wcci-international.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/420/196
24. Gözüm, A. İ. C., & Kandır, A. (2021). Digital games pre-schoolers play: parental mediation and examination of educational content. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3293-3326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10382-2
25. Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2005). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Understanding and analysing data. Pearson.
26. Gürler, S. A., & Ömeroğlu, E. (2023). The relation between child raising attitudes of parents and their mediation role for the digital technology use of children. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2229-2243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11266-3
27. Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online. depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of, 9-16.
28. Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B. & De Haan, J. (2013). Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. EU Kids Online, LSE
29. Katz, V. S., Moran, M. B., & Gonzalez, C. (2018). Connecting with technology in lower-income US families. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2509-2533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817726319
30. Kayri, M. (2009). Araştırmalarda gruplar arası farkın belirlenmesine yönelik çoklu karşılaştırma teknikleri. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 51-64.
31. Kucirkova, N., Littleton, K., & Kyparissiadis, A. (2018). The influence of children's gender and age on children's use of digital media at home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 545-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12543
32. Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E. & Rideout, V. J. (2015). Young children's screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001
33. Livingstone, S., & Duerager, A (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? EU Kids Online
34. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
35. Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Helsper, E. J., Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F., Veltri, G. A., & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277
36. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC96732
37. Mendoza, K. (2009). Surveying parental mediation: connections, challenges and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 2841. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-1-1-3
38. Merdin, E. (2025). Theoretical framework of parental media mediation in early childhood. Journal of Child Development and Education, 1(1), 47-54.
39. Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
40. Nacak, M., Yağmurlu, B., Durgel, E., & Van de Vijver, F. (2011). Metropol ve Anadolu'da ebeveynlik: Biliş ve davranışlarda şehrin ve eğitim düzeyinin rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(67).
41. Nathanson, A. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children’s aggression. Communication Research, 26, 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002002
42. Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4502_1
43. Nevski, E., & Siibak, A. (2016). The role of parents and parental mediation on 0–3-year olds’ digital play with smart devices: Estonian parents’ attitudes and practices. Early Years, 36(3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1161601
44. Nikken, P., & de Haan, J. (2015). Guiding young children’s internet use at home: Problems that parents experience in their parental mediation and the need for parenting support. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-3
45. Nikken, P., & Opree, S. J. (2018). Guiding young children’s digital media use: SES-differences in mediation concerns and competence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 1844-1857. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-3
46. Nikken, P., & Schols, M. (2015). How and why parents guide the media use of young children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3423-3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4
47. Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038
48. Piotrowski, J. T. (2017). The parental media mediation context of young children’s media use. Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development, 205-219. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.498285
49. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802287564
50. Şen. M., Demir, E., Teke, N. & Yılmaz, A. (2020). Erken çocukluk ebeveyn medya aracılık ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (53), 228-265. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.646852
51. Talves, K., & Kalmus, V. (2015). Gendered mediation of children’s internet use: A keyhole for looking into changing socialization practices. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4
52. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation:“Instructive mediation”, “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474
53. Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children's media use: Gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4403_1
54. Yağmurlu, B., Çıtlak, B., Dost, A. & Leyendecker, B. (2009). Türk annelerin çocuk sosyalleştirme hedeflerinde eğitime bağlı olarak gözlemlenen farklılıklar. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 1-15
55. Yıldırım, B. (2021). Okul öncesi çocukların medya araçları kullanımlarında annelerin medya aracılık rolleri ve bilinçli farkındalıklarının incelenmesi (Master's thesis, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü).
56. Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., De Ferrerre, E., & Looy, J. V. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240