Perceptions of Foreigners about Process of Learning Turkish (Türkçe Öğrenen Yabancıların Öğrenme Süreçlerine Yönelik Algıları).....Doi: 10.14686/BUEFAD.201428189

Abstract

Foreign students’ process of learning Turkish has been a neglected research topic in studies conducted on teaching Turkish to foreigners. This study tackles the process foreign students go through while learning Turkish within the dimension of learning domains. The aim of this study is to obtain information about the Turkish learning process of foreign students who come to Turkey for higher education. This research is a qualitative study. Criterion sampling was used in determining the sample of the study. The criterion of this research was Tanzanian students who have learnt basic Turkish at Gazi TOMER during the 2013-2014 academic year. Data gathering was conducted through document analysis and focus group interviews. The data gathered through semi-structured interviews were analyzed by inductive coding and descriptive analysis method. According to the investigation of the students’ perceptions within the dimension of learning domains, the study revealed that the domain the students had most difficulties was listening, while the least difficulty was observed in reading.

Keywords

• -

Türkçe Öğrenen Yabancıların Öğrenme Süreçlerine Yönelik Algıları

Abstract

Yabancılara Türkçenin öğretimi konusu üzerine yapılan çalışmalarda Türkçe öğrenen yabancı öğrencilerin geçirdikleri süreç bir inceleme alanı olarak değerlendirilmemiştir. Bu çalışmada yabancı öğrencilerin Türkçeyi öğrenirken yaşadıkları süreç, öğrenme alanları boyutunda ele alınmıştır. Bu araştırmanın amacı, üniversite eğitimi almak için Türkiye’ye gelen yabancı uyruklu öğrencilerin, Türkçeyi öğrenirken nasıl bir süreç yaşadıklarına dair bilgi sahibi olmaktır. Bu çalışma, nitel bir araştırmadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi belirlenirken ölçüt örneklemeden yararlanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın ölçütünü, 2013–2014 eğitim öğretim yılında Gazi TÖMER’de Türkçeyi temel seviyede öğrenen Tanzanyalı öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verileri, doküman incelemesi ve odak grup görüşmesi ile toplanmıştır. Yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme ile toplanan veriler tümevarımsal kodlama tekniği ve betimsel analiz yöntemiyle çözümlenmiştir. Katılımcıların Türkçeye yönelik algıları öğrenme alanları boyutunda ele alındığında zorlandıkları öğrenme alanın dinleme; zorlanmadıklarının ise okuma olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Türkçe eğitimi, yabancılara Türkçe öğretimi, dil becerileri, algı.

References

1. Abraham, R. G. and Vann, R. J. (1987). Strategies of Two Language Learners: A Case Study. In A. L. Wenden, J. Rubin (Eds.). Learner Strategies in Language Learning (85-102). London: Prentice Hall International.
2. Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching Beliefs About SLA: A Critical Review. In P. Kalaja and A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs About SLA: New Research Approaches. Boston: Kluwer Academic publishers. pp. 7-33
3. Barin, E. (2003). The Importance of Basic vocabulary in Teaching Turkish to Foreigners. Turkishness Science Studies. (13). Niğde.
4. Brecht, R., Robinson, J.L., (1995). On the Value of Formal Instruction in Study Abroad: Student Reactions in Context. In: Freed, B.F. (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 317–333.
5. Breen, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
6. Brown, A. V. (2009-a). Less Commonly Taught Language and Commonly Taught Language Students: A Demographic and Academic Comparison. Foreign Language Annals, 42 (3), 405-423.
7. Brown, A. V. (2009-b). Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of Effective Foreign Language Teaching: A Comparison of Ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93. pp 46-60.
8. Byrne, D. (1993). Teaching Writing Skills. London: Longman.

9. Connor, U., & Mbaye, A. (2002). Discourse Approaches to Writing Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 263–278.
10. Dellal, N. A. and Günak, D. B. (2009). Learning Strategies Related to English as a First Foreign Language for Learners of German as a Second Foreign Language. Language Journal. (145), 64-85.
11. Demircan, Ö. (1990). Foreign Language Teaching Methods. Istanbul: Istanbul University Faculty of Literature Press.
12. Demircan, Ö. (2007). Foreign Language Teaching. Ankara: PegemA.
13. Diaz-Campos, M., (2004). Context of Learning in the Acquisition of Spanish Second Language Phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2), 249–273.
14. Dilidüzgün, Ş. (1995). “Literary Texts in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language". Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.
15. Dörnyei, Z., (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner, Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
16. Durak, E. (2006). “Common European Framework for Languages in the Context of Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language". Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.
17. Ehrman, M. E., and Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition Plus: Correlates of Language Learning Success. Modern Language Journal, 79 (1), 67-89.
18. Güven, E. (2007). “An Analysis of the Errors in Case Suffixes Made by Foreign Learners of Turkish and Some Suggestions to Overcome These Errors”. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Education Sciences. Izmir.
19. Hassall, T., (2006). Learning to Take Leave in Social Conversations: A Diary Study. In: DuFon, M.A., Churchill, E. (Eds.), Language Learners in Study Abroad Contexts. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 31–58.
20. Isabelli, C., (2004). Study Abroad for Advanced Foreign Language Majors: Optimal Duration for Developing Complex Structures In: Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. (Eds.). Advanced Foreign Language Learning, A Challenge to College Programs. Heinle, Canada, pp. 114–130.
21. Kacar, I. G. and Zengin, B. (2009). The Relationship Between the Believes about Learning Languages, Learning Methods, Purposes for Learning Languages and Priorities of Learners of English as a Foreign Language: A Student Perspective. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 5 (1), 55-89.
22. Kara, M. (2010). Problems Faced by Students of Gazi University TÖMER in Learning Turkish and Some Suggestions to Overcome These Problems. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences. 8 (3).
23. Keiko, K. S. (2008). Achieving the Advanced Oral Proficiency in Arabic: A Case Study. Foreign Language Annals, 41 (3). 401-414.
24. Kosucu, F. Z. (2007). “Examination of Gerunds in Teaching Turkish to Foreigners According to Levels”. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.
25. Lightbown, P M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Leamed?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to Communicate in the Second Language: Understanding the Decision to Speak As a Volitional Process. Modern Language Journal, 91. pp 564-576.
27. Mantle Bromley, C. (1995). Positive Attitudes and Realistic Beliefs: Links to Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 79/3, 372-386.
28. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. (Second Edition). California: Sage Publications.
29. Mori, Y. (1999). Epistemological Beliefs and Language Learning Beliefs: What do Language Learners Believe about Their Learning? Language Learning. 49(3), 337-415.
30. Ozbay, M. (2010). Writings on Teaching Turkish. Ankara: Leading Book.
31. Ozcan, E. (2006). “A Glossary Study for Teaching Beginner’s Level Turkish as a Foreign Language”. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Yıldız Technical University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.
32. Pellegrino, V.A., (1998). Student Perspective on Language Learning in a Study Abroad Context. Frontiers 10, 91–120.
33. Regan, V., (1995). The Acquisition of Sociolinguistic Native Speech Norms: Effects of a Year Abroad on a Second Language Learners of French. In: Freed, B.F. (Ed.), Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 245–267.
34. Segalowitz, N. and Freed, B.F., (2004). Context, Contact, and Cognition in Oral Fluency Acquisition: Learning Spanish at Home and Study Abroad Contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2), 173–199.
35. Simsek, H. and Yıldırım, A. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
36. Stenson, N., Janus, L., & Mulkern, A. (1998). Report of the Less Commonly Taught Languages Summit: September 20-21, 1996. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition Working Papers Series, Minneapolis, MN.
37. Tarp, G., (2006). Student Perspectives in Short-term Study Programmes Abroad; A Grounded Theory Study. In: Byram, M., Feng, A. (Eds.), Living and Studying Abroad: Research and Practice. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 157–185.
38. Ulker, N. (2007). “An Analytic and Evaluative Overview of the Process of Cultural Transfer in Teaching Turkish: Hitit Course Books” Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.
39. Ungan, S. (2006). Attitudes of the European Union towards Language Teaching and Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences. (15). 217-226.
40. Victori, M. and Lockhart, W. (1995). Enhancing Metacognition in Self-directed Language Learning. System, 23 (2), 223-234.
41. Wesely, P. M. (2012). Learner Attitudes, Perceptions and Beliefs in Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45. pp 98-117.
42. Wilkinson, S., (1998). Study Abroad from the Participants’ Perspective: A Challenge to Common Beliefs. Foreign Language Annals 31 (1), 23–39.
43. Yayli, D. (2007). Opinions of Students of Turkish as a Foreign Language Program on Turkish and Turkey, EJER. (26).
44. Yoshida, R. (2008). Perceptions of a Learner’s Self-expressive Speech by an Instructor and the Learner. Foreign Language Annals, 40. pp 622-634.
45. Zengin, R. (1995). “Exercises in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language”. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences. Istanbul.