Silicone implant induced lymphadenopathy after breast reconstructive surgery
Öz
-
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Reference 1: Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1227.
- Reference2:Blichert-Toft M, Nielsen M, Düring M, et al. Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danishrandomized DBCG-82TM protocol. ActaOncol 2008; 47:672.
- Reference3:Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. LancetOncol 2012; 13:412.
- Reference4:Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233.
- Reference5:Nickel KB, Fox IK, Margenthaler JA, et al. Effect of NoninfectiousWound Complications after Mastectomy on Subsequent Surgical Procedures and Early ImplantLoss. J AmCollSurg 2016; 222:844.
- Reference6: Truong LD, Cartwright J, Jr, Goodman MD, Woznicki D. Silicone lymphadenopathy associated with augmentationmammaplasty. Morphologic features of nine cases. Am J SurgPathol. 1988;12:484–91.
- Reference7:Adams ST, Cox J, Rao GS. Axillary silicone lymphadenopathy presenting with a lump and alteredsensation in the breast: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2009;3:6442. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Reference8: Shaaban H, Jmor S, Alvi R. Leakage and silicone lymphadenopathy with cohesive breast implant. Br J PlastSurg. 2003;56:518–9. [PubMed]
- Reference9:. Blum A, Abboud W, Shajrawi I, Tatour I. Prolonged fever due to silicone granulomatosis. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9:121–2.
