Araştırma Makalesi

Prevalence, treatment and complications of mandibular fractures

Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

Prevalence, treatment and complications of mandibular fractures

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review and analyze the prevalence, treatment, and complications of mandibular fractures managed by the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Çukurova University between March 2015 and March 2017

Materials and Methods: Mandibular fractures were sorted by etiology and fracture location. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures were performed using 2.0mm or 2.4mm fixation systems. Closed reduction of fractures was performed using arch bars, intermaxillary fixation screws or wire-composite splints. The following complications were recorded: Temporary paresthesia, permanent paresthesia, malocclusion, infection, temporomandibular joint disorder, plate exposure and root damage.

Results: The mean patient age was 32.8±(13.8). Males constituted 77.4%(n=65) and females constituted 22.6%(n=19) of the patients. The most common cause of mandibular fractures in this study was interpersonal violence (27 cases,32.1%), followed by road traffic accidents(22 cases, 26.2%) and falls(21 cases,25%). The least common cause of fractures was sports accident(6 cases,7.1%). The most common fracture localization was the condyle(27,24.5%), followed by the angle (24,21.8%), body (19,17.3%), symphysis/parasymphysis (18, 16.4%) and alveolar bone (17,15.5%). Fifty patients were treated by ORIF (59.5%), 29 patients were treated by closed reduction (34.5%). Complications in varying severity were observed in 25(29.7%) patients. The most common complication in this study was temporary paresthesia(13.1%) followed by TMD(6.0%). Other complications were seen infrequently.

Conclusion: It is important to follow contemporary trends to understand how different centers manage their patients in different socio-economic regions and different levels of clinical facilities/resources. The incidence and causes of mandibular fractures may reflect the trauma patterns within the community, which is important for conducting better health policy strategies.


Keywords

Mandible,maxillofacial,trauma

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Simsek S, Simsek B, Abubaker AO, Laskin DM. A comparative study of mandibular fractures in the United States and Turkey. Int J Oral Max Surg. 2007;36(5):395-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.11.010. PubMed PMID: WOS:000246907500004.
  2. 2. Samieirad S, Tohidi E, Shahidi-Payam A, Hashemipour MA, Abedini A. Retrospective study maxillofacial fractures epidemiology and treatment plans in Southeast of Iran. Med Oral Patol Oral. 2015;20(6):E729-E36. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20652. PubMed PMID: WOS:000369435500013.
  3. 3. Samieirad S, Aboutorabzade MR, Tohidi E, Shaban B, Khalife H, Hashemipour MA, Salami HR. Maxillofacial fracture epidemiology and treatment plans in the Northeast of Iran: A retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral. 2017;22(5):E616-E24. doi: 10.4317/medoral.21809. PubMed PMID: WOS:000422866700014.
  4. 4. Ogundare BO, Bonnick A, Bayley N. Pattern of mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma center. J Oral Maxil Surg. 2003;61(6):713-8. doi: 10.1053/joms.2003.50118. PubMed PMID: WOS:000183272700018.
  5. 5. Krishnaraj S, Chinnasamy R. A 4-year retrospective study of mandibular fractures in a south Indian city. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18(4):776-80. doi: DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e318069005d. PubMed PMID: WOS:000248513100013.
  6. 6. Erol B, Tanrikulu R, Gorgun B. Maxillofacial fractures. Analysis of demographic distribution and treatment in 2901 patients (25-year experience). J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004;32(5):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2004.04.006. PubMed PMID: 15458673.
  7. 7. Ellis E, 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985;59(2):120-9. PubMed PMID: 3856795.
  8. 8. Atilgan S, Erol B, Yaman F, Yilmaz N, Ucan MC. Mandibular fractures: a comparative analysis between young and adult patients in the southeast region of Turkey. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(1):17-22. doi: Doi 10.1590/S1678-77572010000100005. PubMed PMID: WOS:000276524900004.
  9. 9. Yasar M, Bayram A, Dogan M, Sagit M, Kaya A, Ozcan I, Mutlu C. Retrospective Analysis of Surgically Managed Maxillofacial Fractures in Kayseri Training and Research Hospital. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;54(1):5-9. doi: 10.5152/tao.2016.1501. PubMed PMID: 29392008; PMCID: PMC5782976.
  10. 10. Eriksson L, Willmar K. Jaw fractures in Malmo 1952-62 and 1975-85. Swed Dent J. 1987;11(1-2):31-6. PubMed PMID: 3473708.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Tükel, Hüseyin Can, ve Mehmet Emre Benlidayı. “Prevalence, treatment and complications of mandibular fractures”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 44, sy 2, Haziran 2019, ss. 369-77, doi:10.17826/cumj.469210.