Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing venous port catheter implantation
Yıl 2017,
Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3, 604 - 605, 30.09.2017
Sevgi Kesici
,
Verda Tuna
Selma Özkan
Ercüment Cengiz
Aygen Türkmen
Öz
Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing venous port catheter implantation
Kaynakça
-
1. Kıral N, Saraç G, Yüksel T, Salepçi B, Çağlayan B. Nadir görülen port kateter komplikasyonu. Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi. 2010;58:177-80.
-
2. Samancı T, Mandel NM, Bozkurt AK, Kutlu F, Uras C. 115 kanser hastasında port komplikasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2004;35:71-7.
-
3. John TC, Jeffrey PL, Todd MM, Livingston S, Joseph AK. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports. Am J Surg. 2004;188:722-7.
-
4. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg. 1998;22:12-6.
-
5. Arch P. Port navigation: let the journey begin. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11:485-8.
-
6. Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use part:1 mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1-17.
-
7. Gullo SM. Implanted ports. technologic advances and nursing care issues, Nurs Clin North Am. 1993;28:859-71.
-
8. Ahmad I, Ray CE Jr. Complications of central venous access devices. In: Central Venous Access (Ed CE Ray Jr.):151-65. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Venöz port kateter implantasyonu uygulanan hastaların retrospektif analizi
Yıl 2017,
Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3, 604 - 605, 30.09.2017
Sevgi Kesici
,
Verda Tuna
Selma Özkan
Ercüment Cengiz
Aygen Türkmen
Öz
Venöz port kateter implantasyonu uygulanan hastaların retrospektif analizi
Anahtar Kelimeler
venöz port kateter
Kaynakça
-
1. Kıral N, Saraç G, Yüksel T, Salepçi B, Çağlayan B. Nadir görülen port kateter komplikasyonu. Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi. 2010;58:177-80.
-
2. Samancı T, Mandel NM, Bozkurt AK, Kutlu F, Uras C. 115 kanser hastasında port komplikasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi. 2004;35:71-7.
-
3. John TC, Jeffrey PL, Todd MM, Livingston S, Joseph AK. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports. Am J Surg. 2004;188:722-7.
-
4. Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg. 1998;22:12-6.
-
5. Arch P. Port navigation: let the journey begin. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11:485-8.
-
6. Polderman KH, Girbes AJ. Central venous catheter use part:1 mechanical complications. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1-17.
-
7. Gullo SM. Implanted ports. technologic advances and nursing care issues, Nurs Clin North Am. 1993;28:859-71.
-
8. Ahmad I, Ray CE Jr. Complications of central venous access devices. In: Central Venous Access (Ed CE Ray Jr.):151-65. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Toplam 8 adet kaynakça vardır.