BibTex RIS Cite

The influence of pericentric inversion in 10th chromosome on aggressive behavior and hyperactivity

Year 2013, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 108 - 113, 01.03.2013

Abstract

Aggressive behavior and hyperactivity are neurodevelopmental diseases with unknown pathogenesis. Pericentric inv(10)(p11.2;q21.2) mutation is frequently encountered in cytogenetic laboratories. This mutation is accepted as a polymorphic variant and is phenotypically silent, but in some cases it has been associated with neurodevelopmental diseases like autism. After blood culturing, standard chromosome obtaining procedure was applied to patients. In this study, clinical and cytogenetical findings of a boy with developmental delay, mental and motor retardation, attention deficit and hyperactivity have been reported. As a result of chromosome analysis, on chromosome 10, a large pericentric inversion between p11.1 and q22.q bands has been found. Karyotype analysis was also performed to mother, father and siblings of the patient and they have been found to have normal karyotype. It is plausible to consider a relation between inv(10) and some behavioral problems. Additionally, molecular studies targeting 10p-q critical region will be more informative for the true identification of this disease.

References

  • Kaiser P. Pericentric inversion: problems and significance for clinical genetics. Hum Genet. 1984; 68:1Castermans D, Vermeesch JR, Fryns JP, Steyaert JG, Van de Ven WJ, Creemers JW ve ark. Identification and characterization of the TRIP8 and REEP3 genes on chromosome 10q21.3 as novel candidate genes for autism. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15: 422–31.
  • Collınson MN, Fisher AM, Walker J, Currie J, Williams L, Roberts P. Inv(10)(p11.2q21.2), a variant chromosome. Hum Genet. 1997;101:175–80.
  • Gilling M, Dullinger JS, Gesk S, Metzke-Heidemann S, Siebert R, Meyer T et al. Breakpoint Cloning and Haplotype Analysis Indicate a Single Origin of the Common Inv(10)(p11.2q21.2) mutation among Northern Europeans. Am J Hum Genet. 2006; 78:878-83.
  • Kosztolányi G, Weisenbach J, Mehes K. Syndrome of arachnodactyly, disturbance of cranial ossification, protruding eyes, feeding difficulties and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet. 1995; 58:213–16. LordaSanchez I, Garcıa-Ruız PJ, Rodrıguez De Alba M, Montoya J, Playan A, Sarasa JL et al. A Melas phenotype and a paternal inherited inversion of chromosome 10 in a female patient. Genet Couns. 2000;11:261-5.
  • Penso CA, Sandstrom MM, Garber MF, Ladoulis M, Stryker JM, Benacerraf BB. Early amniocentesis: report of 407 cases with neonatal follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:1032–36.
  • Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49:995–13.
  • Youings S, Ellis K, Ennis S, Barber J, Jacobs P. A study of reciprocal translocations and inversions detected by light microscopy with special reference to origin, segregation and recurrent abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 126A:46–60.
  • Nakamura Y, Mathew CGP, Sobol H, Easton DF, Telenius H, Bragg T et al. Linked markers flanking the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Genomics. 1989; 5:199-203.
  • Wu J, Carson NL, Myers S, Pakstis AJ, Kidd JR, Castiglione CM et al. The genetic defect in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A maps next to the centromere of chromosome 10. Am J Hum Genet. 1990; 46:624-30.
  • Savaşir S, Sezgin N, Erol N. Ankara Gelişim Tarama Envanteri [in Turkish], Ankara, Rekmay Ltd. Şti., 1994.
  • Boué A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn. 1984; 4:45-67.
  • De La Chapelle A, Schroder J, Stenstrand K, Fellman J, Herva R, Saarni M et al.. Pericentric inversions of human chromosomes 9 and 10. Am J Hum Genet .1974; 26:746–66.
  • Dutrillaux B, Rotman J, Gueguen J. Chromosomal factors in the infertile male. In: de Veerwhite (ed). International aspects of male infertility. International perspectives in urology: 89–102. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1982.
  • Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, Van Den Berghe H. Pericentric inversions in man: personal experience and review of the literature. Hum Genet. 1987; 75:333-8.
  • Simpson JL, Meyers CM, Martin AO, Elias S, Ober C. Translocations are infrequent among couples having repeated spontaneous abortions but no other abnormal pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51: 811-4.
  • Teyssier M, Moreau N. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 10. 2 new cases. Ann Genet. 1983; 26:183-6.
  • Groupe de Cytoge´ne´ticiens Franc¸ais. Pericentric inversions in man: a French collaborative study. Ann Genet. 1986; 29:129–68.
  • Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989; 33:14–53.
  • Sherman SL, Iselius L, Gallano P, Buckton K, Collyer S, DeMey R et al. Segregation analysis of balanced pericentric inversions in pedigree data. Clin Genet. 1986; 30:87–94.
  • Palmer CG, Miles JH, Howard-Peebles PN, Magenis RE, Patil S, Friedman JM. Fetal karyotype following ascertainment of fetal anomalies by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 1987; 7:551-5.
  • Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Frackiewicz A, Law P, Hilditch CJ. The effect of structural aberrations of the chromosomes on productive fitness in man. I Methodology. Clin Genet. 1975;8:159–68.
  • Balıcek P. Pericentric inversion of human chromosomes and its risk. Casopis Lekaru Ceskych (Praha) 2001; 140:38-42.
  • Yazışma Adresi / Address for Correspondence: Dr. Ayfer Pazarbaşı Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Tıbbi Biyoloji ve Genetik Anabilim Dalı Balcalı/ ADANA Tel: 0 322 3387068 e-mail: payfer@cu.edu.tr geliş tarihi/received :24.09.2012 kabul tarihi/accepted:,17.10.2012

10. kromozomdaki perisentrik inversiyonun agresif davranış ve hiperaktivite üzerine etkisi

Year 2013, Volume: 38 Issue: 1, 108 - 113, 01.03.2013

Abstract

Agresif davranış ve hiperaktivite, nedeni ve patogenezi bilinmeyen genetik nörogelişimsel hastalıklardır. Perisentrik inv(10)(p11.2;q21.2) mutasyonu sitogenetik laboratuarlarında sıklıkla tanımlanmaktadır. Bu olgu fenotipik olarak sessizdir ve polimorfik bir varyant olduğu düşünülmektedir ancak bazı hastalarda otizm gibi nörogelişimsel hastalıklarla ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bir erkek çocuğunun, G-bantlama boya tekniği kullanılarak karyotip incelemesi yapıldı. Bu çalışmada; gelişme geriliği, mental motor retardasyonu, dikkat eksikliği ve hiperaktivite hastalığı olan bir erkek çocuğunun klinik ve sitogenetik bulguları rapor edildi. Kromozom analizi sonucunda, 10. kromozomun p11.1 ve q22.1 bantları arasındaki bölgeyi kapsayan geniş bir perisentrik inversiyon saptandı. Probandın anne, baba ve kardeşlerinin karyotiplerinin normal olduğu bulundu. Bulgumuz, inv(10)"un davranış bozukluğu hastalıkları ile ilişkili olabileceğini düşündürmektedir. Bununla birlikte, moleküler çalışmalar, hastalığın patogenezine dahil olan 10p-q kritik bölgesinde yer alan genlerin bulunmasına ve hastalığın daha iyi tanımlanmasına yardımcı olacaktır.

References

  • Kaiser P. Pericentric inversion: problems and significance for clinical genetics. Hum Genet. 1984; 68:1Castermans D, Vermeesch JR, Fryns JP, Steyaert JG, Van de Ven WJ, Creemers JW ve ark. Identification and characterization of the TRIP8 and REEP3 genes on chromosome 10q21.3 as novel candidate genes for autism. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15: 422–31.
  • Collınson MN, Fisher AM, Walker J, Currie J, Williams L, Roberts P. Inv(10)(p11.2q21.2), a variant chromosome. Hum Genet. 1997;101:175–80.
  • Gilling M, Dullinger JS, Gesk S, Metzke-Heidemann S, Siebert R, Meyer T et al. Breakpoint Cloning and Haplotype Analysis Indicate a Single Origin of the Common Inv(10)(p11.2q21.2) mutation among Northern Europeans. Am J Hum Genet. 2006; 78:878-83.
  • Kosztolányi G, Weisenbach J, Mehes K. Syndrome of arachnodactyly, disturbance of cranial ossification, protruding eyes, feeding difficulties and mental retardation. Am J Med Genet. 1995; 58:213–16. LordaSanchez I, Garcıa-Ruız PJ, Rodrıguez De Alba M, Montoya J, Playan A, Sarasa JL et al. A Melas phenotype and a paternal inherited inversion of chromosome 10 in a female patient. Genet Couns. 2000;11:261-5.
  • Penso CA, Sandstrom MM, Garber MF, Ladoulis M, Stryker JM, Benacerraf BB. Early amniocentesis: report of 407 cases with neonatal follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:1032–36.
  • Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 49:995–13.
  • Youings S, Ellis K, Ennis S, Barber J, Jacobs P. A study of reciprocal translocations and inversions detected by light microscopy with special reference to origin, segregation and recurrent abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A 2004; 126A:46–60.
  • Nakamura Y, Mathew CGP, Sobol H, Easton DF, Telenius H, Bragg T et al. Linked markers flanking the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Genomics. 1989; 5:199-203.
  • Wu J, Carson NL, Myers S, Pakstis AJ, Kidd JR, Castiglione CM et al. The genetic defect in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A maps next to the centromere of chromosome 10. Am J Hum Genet. 1990; 46:624-30.
  • Savaşir S, Sezgin N, Erol N. Ankara Gelişim Tarama Envanteri [in Turkish], Ankara, Rekmay Ltd. Şti., 1994.
  • Boué A, Gallano P. A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn. 1984; 4:45-67.
  • De La Chapelle A, Schroder J, Stenstrand K, Fellman J, Herva R, Saarni M et al.. Pericentric inversions of human chromosomes 9 and 10. Am J Hum Genet .1974; 26:746–66.
  • Dutrillaux B, Rotman J, Gueguen J. Chromosomal factors in the infertile male. In: de Veerwhite (ed). International aspects of male infertility. International perspectives in urology: 89–102. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1982.
  • Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, Van Den Berghe H. Pericentric inversions in man: personal experience and review of the literature. Hum Genet. 1987; 75:333-8.
  • Simpson JL, Meyers CM, Martin AO, Elias S, Ober C. Translocations are infrequent among couples having repeated spontaneous abortions but no other abnormal pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1989; 51: 811-4.
  • Teyssier M, Moreau N. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 10. 2 new cases. Ann Genet. 1983; 26:183-6.
  • Groupe de Cytoge´ne´ticiens Franc¸ais. Pericentric inversions in man: a French collaborative study. Ann Genet. 1986; 29:129–68.
  • Daniel A, Hook EB, Wulf G. Risks of unbalanced progeny at amniocentesis to carriers of chromosome rearrangements: data from United States and Canadian laboratories. Am J Med Genet. 1989; 33:14–53.
  • Sherman SL, Iselius L, Gallano P, Buckton K, Collyer S, DeMey R et al. Segregation analysis of balanced pericentric inversions in pedigree data. Clin Genet. 1986; 30:87–94.
  • Palmer CG, Miles JH, Howard-Peebles PN, Magenis RE, Patil S, Friedman JM. Fetal karyotype following ascertainment of fetal anomalies by ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 1987; 7:551-5.
  • Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Frackiewicz A, Law P, Hilditch CJ. The effect of structural aberrations of the chromosomes on productive fitness in man. I Methodology. Clin Genet. 1975;8:159–68.
  • Balıcek P. Pericentric inversion of human chromosomes and its risk. Casopis Lekaru Ceskych (Praha) 2001; 140:38-42.
  • Yazışma Adresi / Address for Correspondence: Dr. Ayfer Pazarbaşı Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Tıbbi Biyoloji ve Genetik Anabilim Dalı Balcalı/ ADANA Tel: 0 322 3387068 e-mail: payfer@cu.edu.tr geliş tarihi/received :24.09.2012 kabul tarihi/accepted:,17.10.2012
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research
Authors

Nilgün Tanrıverdi This is me

Ayfer Pazarbaşı This is me

Dilara Karahan This is me

Ayşe Avcı This is me

Ayşegül Yolga Tahiroğlu This is me

Erdal Tunç This is me

Osman Demirhan This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 38 Issue: 1

Cite

MLA Tanrıverdi, Nilgün et al. “10. Kromozomdaki Perisentrik Inversiyonun Agresif davranış Ve Hiperaktivite üzerine Etkisi”. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, 2013, pp. 108-13.