Research Article

Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods

Volume: 13 Number: 1 January 30, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods

Abstract

Expansive soils are a problem affecting many parts of the world. The fact that the expenses incurred due to the damage caused by swelling soils are quite high shows that this problem cannot be ignored. In this study, swelling pressures of compacted clays are determined using two different test methods, one of which is an oedometer test equipment. Three different clay samples were used in the tests. Free and constant-volume swell tests are conducted on compacted samples prepared at various water contents and dry densities. Free swell pressure and constant-volume swell pressure tests are performed on samples with identical initial conditions using oedometer testing equipment. These tests are repeated more than two times. Regression analysis was conducted on the free and constant-volume swell pressures based on the obtained data. Then, the swelling pressures calculated using the empirical equation are compared with test results and literature data.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Süleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Project Number

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi 310 nolu BAP projesi

Thanks

This study was produced from project number 310 titled “Fuzzy Logic Approach in Determining Swelling and Suction Properties of Clayey Soils”. The authors would like to thank Süleyman Demirel University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit for their support.

References

  1. [1] Nelson, J.D., and Miller, D.J., Expansive Soils Problem and Practice in Foundation and Pavement Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 253 p.,1992.
  2. [2] Astm, D4546, “Standart test methods for one dimensional swell or settlement potential of cohesive soils,” Annual Book of ASTM Standarts, vol.4, no.8, pp.992-1100, 1986.
  3. [3] Al-Muhaidib, A.I., “Swelling behaviour of expansive shales from the middle region of Saudi Arabia,” Geotechnical Geol. Eng., vol.16, no.4, pp.291-307, 1998.
  4. [4] El-Sayed, S.T., and Rabbaa, S.A., “Factors affecting behavior of expansive soils in the laboratory and field,” Geotechnical Engineering, vol.17, pp.89-107, 1986.
  5. [5] Erol, A.O., “In-situ and laboratory measured suction parameters for predictions of swelling,” In Proceeding of the Seventh International Conference on Expansive Soils, Dallas, TX, 2-30, 1992.
  6. [6] Al-Shamrani, M.A., and Al- Mhaidib, A.I., “Swelling behavior under oedometric and triaxial loading conditions,” In: shackelford, C.D., Houston, S.L., Chang, N.Y., (Eds.), Advances in Unsaturated Geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication, vol.99, pp.344-360, 2000.
  7. [7] Abduljauwad, S.N., and Al-Sulaimani, G.J., “Determination of swell potential of Al-Qatif clay,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol.16, no.4, pp.469-484, 1993.
  8. [8] Tisot, J.P., and Aboushook, M.I., “Triaxial study of the swelling characteristic,” Proc. of the Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Haifa, 94-97, 1983.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Civil Geotechnical Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 30, 2025

Submission Date

August 30, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 9, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Çimen, Ö., & Keskin, N. (2025). Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 13(1), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1541087
AMA
1.Çimen Ö, Keskin N. Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods. DUBİTED. 2025;13(1):545-557. doi:10.29130/dubited.1541087
Chicago
Çimen, Ömür, and Nilay Keskin. 2025. “Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 13 (1): 545-57. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1541087.
EndNote
Çimen Ö, Keskin N (January 1, 2025) Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 13 1 545–557.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Çimen and N. Keskin, “Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods”, DUBİTED, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 545–557, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.29130/dubited.1541087.
ISNAD
Çimen, Ömür - Keskin, Nilay. “Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 13/1 (January 1, 2025): 545-557. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1541087.
JAMA
1.Çimen Ö, Keskin N. Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods. DUBİTED. 2025;13:545–557.
MLA
Çimen, Ömür, and Nilay Keskin. “Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2025, pp. 545-57, doi:10.29130/dubited.1541087.
Vancouver
1.Ömür Çimen, Nilay Keskin. Comparison of Swelling Pressures Determined by Two Different Methods. DUBİTED. 2025 Jan. 1;13(1):545-57. doi:10.29130/dubited.1541087