Conference Paper

The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning

Volume: 6 Number: 2 April 6, 2018
TR EN

The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine the effect of strand configuration on stress distribution and debonding parameters of precast, pretensioned concrete girders after prestressing force is transferred from strands to concrete by bond at their interface. Determination of strand configuration is important as well as determination of number of strands because it affects stress distribution and debonding parameters of girders. The debonding of strands is an application in order to control the tensile and compressive stresses at the support zone of girder. One of the typical precast girder with 90 cm height is considered in this study. To determine the effect of strand configuration, nine girders with the same cross-section, effective span length and material properties but different strand configuration are selected as an application. Equal prestressing force is applied all strands simultaneously. Three dimensional finite element models (FEM) of girder are constituted using SAP 2000 software. At the end of the study, numerically identified stress distribution and calculated debonding parameters of girders compared with each other. 

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Tan, K.H. and Ng, C.K., “Effects of deviators and strand configuration on behavior of externally prestressed beams.” ACI Structural Journal, vol. 94, pp. 13-22, 1997.
  2. [2] Kannel, J., French, C. and Stolarski, H., “Release methodology of strands to reduce end cracking in pretensioned concrete girders”. PCI Journal, vol. 42 (1), pp. 42-54, 1997.
  3. [3] Moon, J.H., Shin, K.J., Lim, J.H. and Lee, S.H., “Effects of stressed and unstressed reinforcements on prestressed concrete members with unbonded strands.” KCI Concrete Journal, vol. 12, pp. 131-138, 2000.
  4. [4] Kang-Su, K., Deuck-Hang, L., Sang-Sik, K., Chang-Hyuk, K. and Jung-Woo, P., “ Study on the efficiency of post-tension slab method by strand lay-out.” Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure and Construction, vol. 25(9), pp. 59-68, 2009.
  5. [5] Brice, R., Khaleghi, B. and Seguirant, S. J. “Design optimization for fabrication of pretensioned concrete bridge girders: An example problem.” PCI Journal, vol. 54(4), pp. 73-111, 2009.
  6. [6] Tadros, M.K., Baddie S.S., and Tuan C.Y., “Evaluation and repair procedures for precast/prestressed concrete girders with longitudinal cracking in the web”. National Cooperative Highway Research Program report 654. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2010.
  7. [7] Computers and Structures Inc., SAP 2000 Static and dynamic finite element analysis of structures, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2016
  8. [8] AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., 2012.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Publication Date

April 6, 2018

Submission Date

November 21, 2017

Acceptance Date

January 19, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Atmaca, B., & Ateş, Ş. (2018). The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 401-408. https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS
AMA
1.Atmaca B, Ateş Ş. The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning. DUBİTED. 2018;6(2):401-408. https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS
Chicago
Atmaca, Barbaros, and Şevket Ateş. 2018. “The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 6 (2): 401-8. https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS.
EndNote
Atmaca B, Ateş Ş (April 1, 2018) The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 6 2 401–408.
IEEE
[1]B. Atmaca and Ş. Ateş, “The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning”, DUBİTED, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 401–408, Apr. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS
ISNAD
Atmaca, Barbaros - Ateş, Şevket. “The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 6/2 (April 1, 2018): 401-408. https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS.
JAMA
1.Atmaca B, Ateş Ş. The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning. DUBİTED. 2018;6:401–408.
MLA
Atmaca, Barbaros, and Şevket Ateş. “The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, Apr. 2018, pp. 401-8, https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS.
Vancouver
1.Barbaros Atmaca, Şevket Ateş. The Effect of Strand Configuration on Stress Distribution and Debonding Parameters of Prestressed Girder After Detensioning. DUBİTED [Internet]. 2018 Apr. 1;6(2):401-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA99AE59CS