Research Article

Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province

Volume: 9 Number: 4 July 31, 2021
EN TR

Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province

Abstract

Earthquake is a natural phenomenon that cannot be ignored in Turkey as in the world. Since Turkey is located in the earthquake zone, research on these issues has increased in recent years in Turkey. In this study, the effects of the earthquake on the reinforced concrete and masonry/mixed buildings in the central neighborhoods of Bilecik province were examined by the Street Survey Method. In this context, a total of 1391 buildings including 1021 reinforced concrete and 370 masonry/mixed buildings on the central districts of Bilecik were examined. The average building earthquake scores for the reinforced concrete and masonry/mixed buildings of each neighborhood were calculated. In terms of reinforced concrete buildings, Bahçelievler, Cumhuriyet, Gazipaşa, Ismetpaşa and Istiklal neighborhoods were found to be at Low Risk in terms of Building Earthquake Safety, while Beşiktaş, Ertuğrulgazi and Hürriyet neighborhoods were found to be Safe in terms of Building Earthquake Safety. All masonry/mixed buildings were found to be Safe in terms of Building Earthquake Safety.

Keywords

Earthquake, Reinforced concrete buildings, Masonry/Mixed buildings, Street survey method, Bilecik province

References

  1. [1] M.Mohammadı,“Investigation of earthquake performance of reinforced concrete-masonry mixed structures,” M.S. thesis,Graduate Education Institute, Konya Technical University, Konya, Turkey, 2019.
  2. [2] A. Akgönen, “Investigation of earthquake resistant building design and repair reinforcement techniques,” M.S.thesis, Institute of Science and Technology, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, 05.
  3. [3] A. GürbüzandM. Tekin, “Determination of regional earthquake risk distribution of existing buildings by performance ranking method,”Celal Bayar University Journal of Science.,vol. 11, no 1, pp. 37-48, 2015.
  4. [4] M. Özkaratay, “Evaluation of a 6-storey Reinforced Concrete Building Demolished İn Düzce Earthquake With Different Methods,” M.S. thesis, Institute of Science, Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey, 2014.
  5. [5] Z. Tozlu, Ö. Anıl and M. Şahmaran,“Comprehensive Field Application of The Rapid Assessment Technique Within The Scope of The Urban Transformation Law No. 6306: The Example of Niğde,”3. Turkey Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Conference.,İzmir, Turkey, 2015.
  6. [6] R. Temür,“Rapid Due Diligence (DURTES) Method and development of a computer program,” M.S.thesis, Institute of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey, 2006.
  7. [7] E. Işık andZ. Tozlu, “Calculation of structure performance score using different variables,”BEÜ Journal of Science, BEU Journal of Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161-172, 2015.
  8. [8] D. Okuyucu, G. Savaş, B. Gedik, M. Şuşarlıoğlu and T. Kara, “Determination of regional earthquake risk distribution of buildings by street scanning method: Erzurum - Yenişehir example,”Fırat University Journal of Engineering Sciences,vol.30,no. 1, pp. 219-231, 2018.
  9. [9] H. Tokgöz, and H. Bayraktar, “Application of Street Scanning Method in The İdentification of Risky Buildings in Düzce Province Kaynaşlı District,”Düzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol.3, no.1, pp. 107–116, 2015.
  10. [10] A. Yakut, “Examınatıon of Seısmıc Performance Assessment Procedures For Rc Buıldıngs ın Turkey,”Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska, July 21-25, 2014.
APA
Ateş, A., Poyraz, S., & Çoban, Ö. (2021). Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 9(4), 1310-1328. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.846885
AMA
1.Ateş A, Poyraz S, Çoban Ö. Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province. DUBİTED. 2021;9(4):1310-1328. doi:10.29130/dubited.846885
Chicago
Ateş, Ali, Semiha Poyraz, and Ömer Çoban. 2021. “Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 9 (4): 1310-28. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.846885.
EndNote
Ateş A, Poyraz S, Çoban Ö (July 1, 2021) Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 9 4 1310–1328.
IEEE
[1]A. Ateş, S. Poyraz, and Ö. Çoban, “Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province”, DUBİTED, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1310–1328, July 2021, doi: 10.29130/dubited.846885.
ISNAD
Ateş, Ali - Poyraz, Semiha - Çoban, Ömer. “Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 9/4 (July 1, 2021): 1310-1328. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.846885.
JAMA
1.Ateş A, Poyraz S, Çoban Ö. Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province. DUBİTED. 2021;9:1310–1328.
MLA
Ateş, Ali, et al. “Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, July 2021, pp. 1310-28, doi:10.29130/dubited.846885.
Vancouver
1.Ali Ateş, Semiha Poyraz, Ömer Çoban. Determination of Regional Soil Structure Earthquake Risk Distribution of Buildings by Street Survey Method: The Sample of Bilecik Province. DUBİTED. 2021 Jul. 1;9(4):1310-28. doi:10.29130/dubited.846885