The Effects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Esthetic Composites

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 2 - Cilt: 38 Sayı: 2, 71 - 76, 01.05.2011

Ceren Özge Biçer Nuray Attar Yonca Korkmaz

Öz

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of esthetic composites finished and polished with two different one-step polishing systems and a conventional multi-step disc system. Materials and Methods: The composites evaluated were Filtek Ultimate 3M ESPE , Amaris Voco and Esthet•X® HD Dentsply . A total of 120 specimens were fabricated in a plexiglass mold covered with a Mylar strip. After polymerization, ten specimens per group received no polishing treatment and served as the control group. For each composite group n=30 , the specimens were randomly divided into three polishing systems: Enhance Dentsply , OptraPol Vivadent and SofLex 3M . All polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The surface roughness values were determined using a profilometer. Results: The smoothest surfaces were achieved under Mylar strips in all composite groups p

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polishing, surface roughness, composite.

Farklı polisaj tekniklerinin estetik kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkileri

Öz

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı tek aşamalı polisaj sistemi ve geleneksel çok aşamalı bir disk sistemi ile bitirme ve polisaj işlemleri yapılmış estetik kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüklerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada kullanılan kompozitler Filtek Ultimate 3M ESPE Grup 1 , Amaris Voco Grup 2 ve Esthet•X® HD Dentsply Grup 3 . Şeffaf bant ile kapatılmış plastik cam kalıplarda toplam 120 örnek hazırlanmıştır. Polimerizasyonun ardından, her grup için polisaj işlemi uygulanmayan 10 örnek, kontrol grubu a olarak belirlenmiştir. Her bir kompozit grubu için n=30 , örnekler rastgele 3 polisaj sistemi grubuna ayrılmıştır: Enhance Dentsply b , OptraPol Vivadent c ve Sof-Lex 3M ESPE d . Tüm polisaj sistemleri üretici firmaların önerileri doğrultusunda uygulanmıştır. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri bir profilometre ile belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Esthet•X® HD dışındaki tüm kompozit gruplarında en düzgün yüzeyler şeffaf bant ile elde edilmiştir p

Anahtar Kelimeler

Polisaj, yüzey pürüzlülüğü, kompozit

Kaynakça

• Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Fi- nishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-9.
• Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Odatsu T, Na- gafuji J, Kotaku M, Miyazaki M, Powers JM. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53: 283-91.
• Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 44-50.
• Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamiza- wa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influ- ence of polishing duration on surface rough- ness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2005; 47: 21-5.
• Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Karabu- lut E. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable res- torative materials. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 755- 64.
• Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled an done hybrid com- posite after finishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 45- 52.
• Xu HH, Weir MD, Sun L, Moreau JL, Takagi S, Chow LC, Antonucci JM. Strong nanocomposites with Ca, PO(4), and F release for caries inhibition. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 19- 28.
• Chen MH. Update on dental nanocom- posites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-60.
• Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An ap- plication of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382- 90.
• Attar N. The effect of finishing and po- lishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 27-35.
• Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of- the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 379-97.
• Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface rough- ness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-92.
• Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface rough- ness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
• Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K. Surface proper- ties of resin composite materials relative to bio- film formation. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 613-22.
• Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scan- ning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 155-63.
• Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and sto- rage solutions on the color stability of resin- based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 587-94.
• Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite re- sins. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 770-8.
• Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable compo- sites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-7.
• Da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. The effect of various denti- frices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e123-8.
• Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr, Ro- drigues AL Jr. Composite surfaces after finish- ing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 136-8.
• Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finish- ing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23: 34-43.
• K. Bashetty, S. Joshi. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin compo- sites. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 34-8.
• Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one- step systems. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 413-20.
• Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polish- ing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 262-6.
• Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives po- lished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260-5.
• Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. The sur- face roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1299-305.
• Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325- 30.
• Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque ac- cumulation on composite surfaces after various finising procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 101-6.
• Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashi- hara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite re- sins. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 225-7.