Research Article

Development of a Design Thinking Skills Perception Scale for High School Students: Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Studies

Number: 59 December 12, 2025
TR EN

Development of a Design Thinking Skills Perception Scale for High School Students: Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Studies

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and validate the Design Thinking Skills Perception Scale (DTSPS) to assess high school students' perceptions of their design thinking (DT) skills. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted, integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 students (Grades 9–12) to explore their views on empathy, problem identification, creative ideation, prototyping, solution orientation, and teamwork. Thematic analysis revealed empathy and teamwork as essential, while prototyping and testing were challenging due to limited experience. These insights guided the initial item pool. In the quantitative phase, data were collected from 208 students in Central Anatolia. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses confirmed a six-dimensional structure, explaining 64% of the total variance. The scale demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity, high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .73–.88; McDonald’s ω = .77–.91), and measurement invariance across gender and grade levels. Scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating stronger DT skill perceptions. The scale can be administered individually or in groups, and provides both total and sub-dimension scores. The DTSPS is a reliable and valid instrument offering insights into students' 21st-century skills, including creativity, collaboration, and problem-solving. It addresses a critical gap in DT education by offering a standardized measure for high school students. The findings suggest that the scale can guide educators in supporting students’ development of DT competencies. Future research should validate the DTSPS in more diverse contexts and explore its integration into digital learning environments.

Keywords

Design Thinking , Validity and Reliability , High School Students

References

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
  2. Atabek, O. (2020). Adaptation of design self-efficacy scale into Turkish language, Turkish StudiesApplied Sciences, 15(1), 1-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.40274
  3. Ayaz, N. (2015). The effect of the project-based learning approach on students’ academic achievements in a science lesson and their attitudes towards science lessons: A meta-analysis study (Publication No. 383512) [Masters’s thesis, Fırat University-Elâzığ]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
  4. Aydemir, A., & Çetin, T. (2021). The effectiveness of products developed for the social studies course through the design thinking approach. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi.41(2).885-910. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.825049
  5. Becker, J. C. (2013). Landscape-level influences on community composition and ecosystem function in a large river ecosystem (Publication No. 3577776) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas State University-San Marcos]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  8. Boni, A. A., Weingart, L. R., & Evenson, S. (2009). Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.8.3.zqr407
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005
APA
Özdemir, A., & Dadakoğlu, B. (2025). Development of a Design Thinking Skills Perception Scale for High School Students: Validity, Reliability, and Invariance Studies. Educational Academic Research, 59, 113-129. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1559434