Finite element stress analysis and topological optimization of a commercial aircraft seat structure

Yıl 2024, , 54 - 70, 20.06.2024

Christian Amaze Sireetorn Kuharat O. Anwar Bég Ali Kadir Walid Jouri Tasveer A. Bég

https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1441584

Cited By: 1

Öz

In recent years, the Finite Element Method (FEM) has emerged as a cornerstone in the field of seating design, particularly within the aircraft industry. Over the past decade, significant advancements in Finite Element (FE) analysis techniques have revolutionized the seat industry, enabling the creation of safer and more cost-effective seat designs. The accuracy of FE analysis plays a pivotal role in this transformation. In the process of constructing a reliable finite element model, the selection and precise manipulation of key parameters are paramount. These crucial parameters encompass element size, time scale, analysis type, and material model. Properly defining and implementing these parameters ensures that the FE model produces accurate results, closely mirroring real-world performance. Verification of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results is commonly accomplished through experimental methods. Notably, when the parameters are appropriately integrated into the modelling process, FE analysis outcomes closely align with experimental results. This study aims to leverage the power of FEM in performing static stress analysis and topology optimization of aircraft seats using the SOLIDWORKS commercial finite element platform. By simulating loading conditions, this research calculates static stresses and displacements experienced by the aircraft seat. Through a comprehensive topology optimization study, the weight of the airplane seat is remarkably reduced by up to 30%, while still prioritizing passenger safety. The success of this optimization showcases the potential for substantial weight savings in aircraft seat design without compromising safety standards.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Finite Element Method (FEM), Aircraft Seat Industry, FE Analysis, Static Stress Analysis, Topology Optimization, Experimental Validation, Material Model, Safety Standards, Weight Reduction, Seating Design.

Destekleyen Kurum

University of Salford

Kaynakça

• [1] Sriram.T.C. (2018). Effect of Anthropometric Variability on Middle-Market Aircraft Seating. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 7-9.
• [2] Caputo, F., De Luca, A., & Marulo, F. (2018). Numerical-experimental assessment of a hybrid FE-MB model of an aircraft seat sled test. . International Journal of Aerospace Engineering.
• [3] Bhonge, P., & Lankaranhi, P. (2008). inite element modeling strategies for dynamic aircraft seats .
• [4] Alexander, R. (1997). Building Composite Aircraft Part 1. Retrieved from Experimental Aircraft Association: https://www.eaa.org/eaa/aircraft-building/builderresources/while-youre-building/building-articles/composite/building-composite-aircraft-part-1#:~:text=Three%20types%20are%20used%20most,varying%20physical%20characteristics%20and%20cost.
• [5] Vahe, B. (1993). BASE FRAME FOR AN AIRCRAFT SEAT. 4-16.
• [6] Ahmadpour,, l., & Robert, J. (2014). The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin.
• [7] Bouwens, J., & Tsay, W. (2017). The high and low comfort peaks in passengers’ flight.
• [8] Alan, G., & Hanser, V. (2009). Finite element analysis. In: Gent, A.N. (Ed.), Elasticity in Engineering with Rubber. In R. Finney, How to design Rubber components (pp. 36-46).
• [9] Hwang, H., & Choi, K. (1997). Second-order shape design sensitivity analysis using a p-version finite element tool. Journal of Structural Optimization.
• [10] Nayroles, B., & Villon, B. (2008). Computational Mechanics. In Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements (pp. 23-26).
• [11] Meola, C., Boccardi, S., & Carlomango, G. (2017). In Infrared Thermography in the Evaluation of Aerospace Composite Materials. Composite Materials in the Aeronautical Industry, 1-24.
• [12] Atkinson, K. E. (2019). An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. 1-7.
• [13] Brauer, J. (2010). What Every Engineer Should Know About Finite Element Analysis. In Finite Element Analysis (pp. 36-40).
• [14] Kassapoglou, C., & Wiley, H. (2013). Design and Analysis of Composite Structures with Applications to Aerospace Structures. NJ, USA.
• [15] Cook, R. (1995). Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis. New Jersy.
• [16] Bhonge, P. (2016). Methodology for Aircraft Seat Certification by Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Wichita State University.