Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Finite element stress analysis and topological optimization of a commercial aircraft seat structure

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 54 - 70, 20.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1441584

Abstract

In recent years, the Finite Element Method (FEM) has emerged as a cornerstone in the field of seating design, particularly within the aircraft industry. Over the past decade, significant advancements in Finite Element (FE) analysis techniques have revolutionized the seat industry, enabling the creation of safer and more cost-effective seat designs. The accuracy of FE analysis plays a pivotal role in this transformation. In the process of constructing a reliable finite element model, the selection and precise manipulation of key parameters are paramount. These crucial parameters encompass element size, time scale, analysis type, and material model. Properly defining and implementing these parameters ensures that the FE model produces accurate results, closely mirroring real-world performance. Verification of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) results is commonly accomplished through experimental methods. Notably, when the parameters are appropriately integrated into the modelling process, FE analysis outcomes closely align with experimental results. This study aims to leverage the power of FEM in performing static stress analysis and topology optimization of aircraft seats using the SOLIDWORKS commercial finite element platform. By simulating loading conditions, this research calculates static stresses and displacements experienced by the aircraft seat. Through a comprehensive topology optimization study, the weight of the airplane seat is remarkably reduced by up to 30%, while still prioritizing passenger safety. The success of this optimization showcases the potential for substantial weight savings in aircraft seat design without compromising safety standards.

Supporting Institution

University of Salford

References

  • [1] Sriram.T.C. (2018). Effect of Anthropometric Variability on Middle-Market Aircraft Seating. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 7-9.
  • [2] Caputo, F., De Luca, A., & Marulo, F. (2018). Numerical-experimental assessment of a hybrid FE-MB model of an aircraft seat sled test. . International Journal of Aerospace Engineering.
  • [3] Bhonge, P., & Lankaranhi, P. (2008). inite element modeling strategies for dynamic aircraft seats .
  • [4] Alexander, R. (1997). Building Composite Aircraft Part 1. Retrieved from Experimental Aircraft Association: https://www.eaa.org/eaa/aircraft-building/builderresources/while-youre-building/building-articles/composite/building-composite-aircraft-part-1#:~:text=Three%20types%20are%20used%20most,varying%20physical%20characteristics%20and%20cost.
  • [5] Vahe, B. (1993). BASE FRAME FOR AN AIRCRAFT SEAT. 4-16.
  • [6] Ahmadpour,, l., & Robert, J. (2014). The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin.
  • [7] Bouwens, J., & Tsay, W. (2017). The high and low comfort peaks in passengers’ flight.
  • [8] Alan, G., & Hanser, V. (2009). Finite element analysis. In: Gent, A.N. (Ed.), Elasticity in Engineering with Rubber. In R. Finney, How to design Rubber components (pp. 36-46).
  • [9] Hwang, H., & Choi, K. (1997). Second-order shape design sensitivity analysis using a p-version finite element tool. Journal of Structural Optimization.
  • [10] Nayroles, B., & Villon, B. (2008). Computational Mechanics. In Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements (pp. 23-26).
  • [11] Meola, C., Boccardi, S., & Carlomango, G. (2017). In Infrared Thermography in the Evaluation of Aerospace Composite Materials. Composite Materials in the Aeronautical Industry, 1-24.
  • [12] Atkinson, K. E. (2019). An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. 1-7.
  • [13] Brauer, J. (2010). What Every Engineer Should Know About Finite Element Analysis. In Finite Element Analysis (pp. 36-40).
  • [14] Kassapoglou, C., & Wiley, H. (2013). Design and Analysis of Composite Structures with Applications to Aerospace Structures. NJ, USA.
  • [15] Cook, R. (1995). Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis. New Jersy.
  • [16] Bhonge, P. (2016). Methodology for Aircraft Seat Certification by Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Wichita State University.
Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 54 - 70, 20.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1441584

Abstract

References

  • [1] Sriram.T.C. (2018). Effect of Anthropometric Variability on Middle-Market Aircraft Seating. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 7-9.
  • [2] Caputo, F., De Luca, A., & Marulo, F. (2018). Numerical-experimental assessment of a hybrid FE-MB model of an aircraft seat sled test. . International Journal of Aerospace Engineering.
  • [3] Bhonge, P., & Lankaranhi, P. (2008). inite element modeling strategies for dynamic aircraft seats .
  • [4] Alexander, R. (1997). Building Composite Aircraft Part 1. Retrieved from Experimental Aircraft Association: https://www.eaa.org/eaa/aircraft-building/builderresources/while-youre-building/building-articles/composite/building-composite-aircraft-part-1#:~:text=Three%20types%20are%20used%20most,varying%20physical%20characteristics%20and%20cost.
  • [5] Vahe, B. (1993). BASE FRAME FOR AN AIRCRAFT SEAT. 4-16.
  • [6] Ahmadpour,, l., & Robert, J. (2014). The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin.
  • [7] Bouwens, J., & Tsay, W. (2017). The high and low comfort peaks in passengers’ flight.
  • [8] Alan, G., & Hanser, V. (2009). Finite element analysis. In: Gent, A.N. (Ed.), Elasticity in Engineering with Rubber. In R. Finney, How to design Rubber components (pp. 36-46).
  • [9] Hwang, H., & Choi, K. (1997). Second-order shape design sensitivity analysis using a p-version finite element tool. Journal of Structural Optimization.
  • [10] Nayroles, B., & Villon, B. (2008). Computational Mechanics. In Generalizing the finite element method: diffuse approximation and diffuse elements (pp. 23-26).
  • [11] Meola, C., Boccardi, S., & Carlomango, G. (2017). In Infrared Thermography in the Evaluation of Aerospace Composite Materials. Composite Materials in the Aeronautical Industry, 1-24.
  • [12] Atkinson, K. E. (2019). An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. 1-7.
  • [13] Brauer, J. (2010). What Every Engineer Should Know About Finite Element Analysis. In Finite Element Analysis (pp. 36-40).
  • [14] Kassapoglou, C., & Wiley, H. (2013). Design and Analysis of Composite Structures with Applications to Aerospace Structures. NJ, USA.
  • [15] Cook, R. (1995). Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis. New Jersy.
  • [16] Bhonge, P. (2016). Methodology for Aircraft Seat Certification by Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Wichita State University.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Optimization Techniques in Mechanical Engineering, Numerical Methods in Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Christian Amaze 0009-0005-2696-4195

Sireetorn Kuharat 0009-0000-5739-9137

O. Anwar Bég This is me 0000-0001-5925-6711

Ali Kadir This is me 0000-0001-5122-8345

Walid Jouri This is me

Tasveer A. Bég This is me

Early Pub Date April 24, 2024
Publication Date June 20, 2024
Submission Date February 28, 2024
Acceptance Date March 15, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Amaze, C., Kuharat, S., Bég, O. A., Kadir, A., et al. (2024). Finite element stress analysis and topological optimization of a commercial aircraft seat structure. European Mechanical Science, 8(2), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1441584

Dergi TR Dizin'de Taranmaktadır.

Flag Counter