Research Article

In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks

Volume: 59 Number: 1 January 29, 2025
EN

In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the in vitro fracture loads of three different terminal cantilever forms of implant-supported zirconia frameworks. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 implant-supported zirconia frameworks (Aconia, China) were CAD/ CAM-fabricated and divided into three groups, each with a distal abutment cantilever form design of 5mm: Group A had square cantilevers, Group B had oval cantilevers, and Group C had oval-square cantilevers. Universal testing machine was used to apply vertical loads to the samples, and the fracture loads were recorded. Variance analysis and Tukey's post-hoc tests were applied for statistical evaluation. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean fracture loads of Group B (587.8±112.2 N) and Group C (591.3 ±81.3 N), but both of these groups exhibited significantly lower fracture loads compared to Group A (893.8±145 N, p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: Within the scope of this experimental study, it can be concluded that implantsupported terminal square shaped cantilever zirconia frameworks, each measuring 5 mm from the distal abutment, are more likely to exhibit greater resistance to vertical loads compared to their oval and oval-square counterparts.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

N/A

Project Number

N/A

Thanks

Thanks

References

  1. Norström Saarva, V.; Bjerkstig, G.; Örtorp, A.; Svanborg, P., A three-year retrospective study on survival of ceramic-veneered zirconia (Y-TZP) fixed dental prostheses performed in private practices. Int J Dent 2017; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9618306 google scholar
  2. De Andrade, G. S.; Kalman, L.; Giudice, R. L.; Adolfi, D.; Feilzer, A. J.; Tribst, J. P. M., Biomechanics of implant-supported restorations. Braz Dent Sci. 2023; 26. https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3637 google scholar
  3. Tang, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, J.; Qiu, L., Implant Survival and Complication Prevalence in Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study with a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023; 38. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9808 google scholar
  4. D’Amico, C.; Bocchieri, S.; Sambataro, S.; Surace, G.; Stumpo, C.; Fiorillo, L., Occlusal load considerations in implant-supported fixed restorations. Prosthesis. 2020; 2:252-65. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis2040023 google scholar
  5. Walter, L.; Greenstein, G., Utility of measuring anterior-posterior spread to determine distal cantilever length off a fixed implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151:790-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.016 google scholar
  6. Haroyan-Darbinyan, E.; Romeo-Rubio, M.; Del Rio-Highsmith, J.; Lynch, C. D.; Castillo-Oyagüe, R., Thermo-mechanical behavior of alternative material combinations for full-arch implant-supported hybrid prostheses with short cantilevers. J Dent. 2023; 132: 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016Zi .j dent.2023.104470 google scholar
  7. Alshamrani, A.; Alhotan, A.; Kelly, E.; Ellakwa, A., Mechanical and Biocompatibility Properties of 3D-Printed Dental Resin Reinforced with Glass Silica and Zirconia Nanoparticles: In Vitro Study. Polym. 2023; 15:2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15112523 google scholar
  8. Branco, A. C.; Colaço, R.; Figueiredo-Pina, C. G.; Serro, A. P., Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Mater. 2023; 16:1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051860 google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Dentistry (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 29, 2025

Submission Date

August 6, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 12, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 59 Number: 1

APA
Al Bayati, T. S., & Muhsin, S. A. (2025). In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks. European Oral Research, 59(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241338647
AMA
1.Al Bayati TS, Muhsin SA. In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks. EOR. 2025;59(1):27-32. doi:10.26650/eor.20241338647
Chicago
Al Bayati, Tabark Shihab, and Saja Ali Muhsin. 2025. “In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Terminal Zirconia Cantilevered Frameworks”. European Oral Research 59 (1): 27-32. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241338647.
EndNote
Al Bayati TS, Muhsin SA (January 1, 2025) In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks. European Oral Research 59 1 27–32.
IEEE
[1]T. S. Al Bayati and S. A. Muhsin, “In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks”, EOR, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 27–32, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.26650/eor.20241338647.
ISNAD
Al Bayati, Tabark Shihab - Muhsin, Saja Ali. “In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Terminal Zirconia Cantilevered Frameworks”. European Oral Research 59/1 (January 1, 2025): 27-32. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20241338647.
JAMA
1.Al Bayati TS, Muhsin SA. In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks. EOR. 2025;59:27–32.
MLA
Al Bayati, Tabark Shihab, and Saja Ali Muhsin. “In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Implant-Supported Terminal Zirconia Cantilevered Frameworks”. European Oral Research, vol. 59, no. 1, Jan. 2025, pp. 27-32, doi:10.26650/eor.20241338647.
Vancouver
1.Tabark Shihab Al Bayati, Saja Ali Muhsin. In vitro fracture resistance of implant-supported terminal zirconia cantilevered frameworks. EOR. 2025 Jan. 1;59(1):27-32. doi:10.26650/eor.20241338647