Effect of surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and evaluation of their microhardness

Year 2020, Volume: 54 Issue: 1, 1 - 8, 23.01.2020

Ozge Gurbuz Aylin Cılıngır Benin Dıkmen Alev Özsoy Meltem Mert Eren

https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200020

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a surface sealant on the surface roughness of different composites and compare their microhardness values. Materials and Methods Sixty disc-shaped specimens were prepared and assigned to 6 groups (n =10). Groups were prepared as follows; Group 1 (Herculite XRV Ultra), Group 2 (Beautifil Bulk Restorative) and Group 3 (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative). Groups 4, 5, and 6 were prepared by applying a surface sealant (BisCover LV) on the specimens in groups 1, 2 and 3. Surface hardness of the discs in group 1, 2, and 3 and surface roughness of the discs in all groups were measured using the Vickers hardness test and a profilometer, respectively. One-way ANOVA was used to test for differences among the groups. Results No significant differences were observed in the microhardness and roughness between the experimental and control groups for each restorative materials. Group 3 showed the highest surface hardness and group 4 showed the lowest surface roughness values. Conclusion Using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step has no significant effect on the surface roughness. The highest hardness values were obtained for the Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative after the polishing step. The smoothest surfaces were obtained for all experimental groups using the BisCover LV resin after the polishing step, Herculite XRV Ultra showed lower average roughness values than the other materials.

Keywords

Roughness, microhardness, resin composite, surface sealant, mechanical properties

Supporting Institution

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

• 1. Abbasi M, Moradi Z, Mirzaei M, Kharazifard MJ, Rezaei S. Polymerization Shrinkage of Five Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Comparison with a Conventional Composite Resin. J Dent (Tehran) 2018;15(6):365-74. [CrossRef]
• 2. Malek Afzali B, Ghasemi A, Mirani A, Abdolazimi Z, Akbarzade Baghban A, Kharazifard MJ. Effect of Ingested Liquids on Color Change of Composite Resins. J Dent (Tehran) 2015;12(8):577-84.
• 3. Son SA, Park JK, Seo DG, Ko CC, Kwon YH. How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerization shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites? Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21(2): 559-65. [CrossRef]
• 4. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:275-9.
• 5. Yap AU, Tan S, Teh TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:117-23. [CrossRef]
• 6. Abuzar MA, Bellur S, Duong N, Kim BB, LuP,Palfreyman N,etal. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methyl methacrylate). J Oral Sci 2010;52:577-81. [CrossRef]
• 7. Chatzivasileiou K, Emmanouil I,Kotsiomiti E,Pissiotis A. Polishing of denture base acrylic resin with chairside polishing kits: an SEM and surface roughness study. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:7981. [CrossRef]
• 8. Sarikaya I, Güler AU. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:10-6. [CrossRef]
• 9. Giacomelli L, Derchi G, Frustaci A, Bruno O, Covani U, Barone A,etal. Surface roughness of commercial composites after different polishing protocols: an analysis with atomic force microscopy. Open Dent J 2010;4:191-4. [CrossRef]
• 10. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet and Restor Dent 2005;17:102-8. [CrossRef]
• 11. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008;33:44-50. [CrossRef]
• 12. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention. A review of the literature. Dent Mat 1997;13:258-69. [CrossRef]
• 13. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002;15:193-7.
• 14. Chung K. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;5:325-30. [CrossRef]
• 15. Ergucu Z, Turkun LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007;32-2:185-92. [CrossRef]
• 16. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001;26:535-76. [CrossRef]
• 17. Ozgunaltay G, Yazıcı AR, Gorucu J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new toothcoloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:218-24. [CrossRef]
• 18. Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004;17:262-6.
• 19. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:687-701. [CrossRef]
• 20. Lee YK, Powers JM. Combined effects of staining substances on resin composites before and after surface sealant application. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:685-91. [CrossRef]
• 21. dos Santos PH, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on roughness of posterior composite resins. Am J of Dent 2003;16:197-201.
• 22. dos Santos PH, Pavan S, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Sinhoreti MA, Filho JN. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness of 4 resin composites after the toothbrushing process and methods to recover superficial smoothness. Quintessence Int 2007;38:247-53.
• 23. Güler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;2:118- 24. [CrossRef]
• 24. Sen D, Goller G, Issever H. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylatebased resins. J Prosthet Dent 2002;5:527-32. [CrossRef]
• 25. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-55. [CrossRef]
• 26. Prakki A, Ribeiro IWJ, Cilli R, Mondelli RFL. Assessing the toothrestoration interface wear resistance of two cementation techniques: effect of a surface sealant. Oper Dent 2005;30:739-46.
• 27. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RG, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:448- 53.
• 28. Barghi N, Alexander C. A new surface sealant for polishing composite resin restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:30-3.
• 29. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000;25:534-43.
• 30. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:33-40. [CrossRef]
• 31. Takeuchi CYG, Orbegoso Flores VH, Palma Dibb RG, Panzeri H, Lara EHG, Dinelli W. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing. Oper Dent 2003;28:283-8.
• 32. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:68-72. [CrossRef]
• 33. Moraes LGP, Rocha RsF, Menrgazzo LM, Araujo EB, Yukimitu K, Moraes JCS. Infrared spectroscopy: a tool for determination of the degree of conversion in dental composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:145-9. [CrossRef]
• 34. Yıkılgan I, Kamak H, Akgul S, Ozcan S, Bala O. Effects of three different bleaching agents on microhardness and roughness of composite sample surfaces finished with different polishing techniques. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e460-5. [CrossRef]
• 35. Shafiei F, Doustfatemeh S. Effect of a Combined Bleaching Regimen on the Microhardness of a Sealed Methacrylate-based and a Silorane-based Composite. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci, 2013;14:111-7.
• 36. Tekce N, Pala K, Tuncer S, Demirci M. The effect of surface sealant application and accelerated aging on posterior restorative surfaces: An SEM and AFM study. Dent Mater J 2017;36:182-9. [CrossRef]
• 37. Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin- composites. Dent Mater 2014;30:149-54. [CrossRef]
• 38. El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization shrinkage stress kinetics and related properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 2014;39:374-82. [CrossRef]
• 39. Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:227-35. [CrossRef]
• 40. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent 2014;42:993-1000. [CrossRef]
• 41. Do T, Church B, Veríssimo C, Hackmyer SP, Tantbirojn D, Simon JF, Versluis A. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites. Pediatr Dent 2014;36:468-73.
• 42. Fronza BM, Rueggeberg FA, Braga RR, Mogilevych B, Soares LE, Martin AA, Ambrosano G, Giannini M. Monomer conversion, microhardness, internal marginal adaptation, and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 2015;31:1542-51. [CrossRef]
• 43. Garoushi S, Vallittu P, Shinya A, Lassila L. Influence of increment thickness on light transmission, degree of conversion and micro hardness of bulk fill composites. Odontology 2016;104:291-7. [CrossRef]
• 44. Galvao MR, Caldas SG, Bagnato VS, Rastelli AN, Andrade MF. Evaluation of degree of conversion and hardness of dental composites photoactivated with different light guide tips. Eur J Dent 2013;7:86-93.
• 45. Whitehead, SA, Shearer, AC, Watts, DC, Wilson, NH, 1995. Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:421-7. [CrossRef]
• 46. Lopes MB, Saquy PC, Moura SK, Wang L, Graciano FMO, Correr Sobrınho L, Gonını júnıor A. Effect of Different Surface Penetrating Sealants on the Roughness of a Nanofiller Composite Resin. Braz Dent J 2012;23:692-7. [CrossRef]
• 47. D'Alpino PH, Pereira JC, Rueggeberg FA, Svizero NR, Miyake K, Pashley DH. Efficacy of composite surface sealers in sealing cavosurface marginal gaps. J Dent 2006;34:252-9. [CrossRef]
• 48. Yap AUJ, WU SS, Chelvan S, Tan ESF. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2005;30:99-104. 49. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 1993;9:108-13. [CrossRef]
• 50. Van Dijken JW, Sjöström S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:185-9. [CrossRef]
• 51. Doray PA, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:244-50. [CrossRef]
• 52. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue T. Effect of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resin. Dent Mater 1985;1:225-7. [CrossRef]
• 53. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1991;70:1299-305. [CrossRef]
• 54. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Dent Mater 2006;22:146-65. [CrossRef]
• 55. Leprince JG, Palin WM, Mullier T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:364-76. [CrossRef]
• 56. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Clelland N, Lee j. Hardness and degree of conversion of posterior packable composites. Oper Dent 2004;9:642-9.
• 57. Bucutas S, Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk-fill vs conventional resin composites. Clin Oral Invest 2014;18:1991-2000. [CrossRef]
• 58. Hahnel S, Dowling AH, El-Safty S, Fleming GJP. The influence of monomeric resin and filler characteristics on the performance of experimental resin-based composites (RBCs) derived from a commercial formulation. Dent Mater 2012;28:416-23. [CrossRef]
• 59. Mobarak E, Elsayed I, Ibrahim M, El-Badrawy W. Effect of LED light-curing on the relative hardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2009;34:65-71. [CrossRef]
• 60. Boyer DB, Chalkley Y & Chan KC. Correlation between strength of bonding to enamel and mechanical properties of dental composites. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1982;16:775-83. [CrossRef]
• 61. Chung KH. The relationship between composition and properties of posterior resin composites. Journal of Dental Research 1990;69:852-6. [CrossRef]
• 62. Abed YA, Sabry HA. Alrobeigy. Degree of conversion and surface hardness of bulk-fill composite versus incremental-fill composite. Tanta Dental Journal 2015;12:71-80. [CrossRef]
• 63. Thome T, Steagall JrW, Tachibana, et al. Influence of distance of curing light source and composite shade on hardness of two composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:486-941. [CrossRef]
• 64. Kim EH, Jung KH, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. Effect of resin thickness on the microhardness and optical properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Restor Dent Endod 2015;40:128-35. [CrossRef]