How Do Early Childhood Education Pre-service Teachers view Science and Scientists?

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 9 , 104 - 119, 18.08.2018

Suzanne El Takach

Öz

The aim of this case study was to collect and to
assess students’ views about their NOS understandings at the beginning and at
the end of their course on teaching science. The study was conducted on 24
students, all females, in their 3^rd semester (2^nd year),
enrolled in their initial teacher education program in early childhood
education. Data were collected from 1) Draw-a-scientist-at-task tool, 2) pre-
and post-questionnaires about students’ views about science and scientists and
3) students’ formative and summative assessment scores. To increase the
validity of results, a member checking was used. Results
showed that prospective teachers’ views about NOS improved significantly after
attending only one course and the that majority of students agreed on the
importance of learning more about science for their professional development. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Nature of science, Pre- service teachers, Early childhood, Pedagogical content knowledge, Science literacy

Kaynakça

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. Akerson, V. et al (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 537-549. Ayoubi, Z. (2017). Research in science education in Lebanon:. Paper presented at the conference organized by entitled “المقالات المنشورة في الدوريات التربوية العربية في تعليم العلوم: مراجعة نقدية على ضوء الاتجاهات العالمية”. Amman, Jordan, July 6, 2017. www.shamaa.org. Bell, R. Blair L., Crawford, B., & Lederman N. (2003) Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 40:487–509. BouJaoude, S. (2002). Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: the case of Lebanon, International Journal of Science Education. Volume 24, Issue 2, 139-155. Chiapetta, E., Fillman, D. & Sethna, G. (1991). Procedures for conducting content analysis of science textbooks. University of Houston, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Houston. Chiappetta, E., & Koballa, T. R. Jr. (2004). Quizzing Students on the Myths of Science. The Science Teacher, p. 58-61. Chiapetta, E. L., & Koballa, T.R. Jr. (2010). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage. DeBoer G.E. (1991) A history of ideas in science education: implications for practice. Teachers College Press, New York. El Takach, S., Ayoubi, Z., & Rawas, M. (2018, March 2-3) Using drawings to investigate Lebanese in-service science teachers’ views about teaching and learning process: Proceedings of the 12th Multidisciplinary Academic Conference on Education (12th MAC 2018), Czech Technical University in Prague, pp. 96-111, https://www.academic-conferences.eu/ ISBN 978-80-88085-18-8. Finson, K. D, Beaver, J.B, & Cramond , B.L. (1995). Development and Field Test of a Checklist for the Draw-A-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, v.95 (4), pp. 195-205. Johnson, J.R. (1999). The forum on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. In American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. Washington, DC: AAAS, pp. 14-25. Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 771-783. National Research Council (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Next Generation Science Standards (2013). Appendix H: Understanding the Scientific Enterprise: The Nature of Science in the Next Generation Science Standards, NGSS Release, from https://nextgenscience.org.org. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved on 15 December 2015. Holbrook, J & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, Vol. 4, No. 3, 275-288. Wells, S. (2015). Why Early Childhood Education is so Important. The Steven Spangler Science Website. Making Science Fun! Retrieved: 8.10.2015. Wilson, R (2008). Promoting the Development of Scientific Thinking. Early Childhood News. The Professional Resource for Teachers and for Parents. www. earlychildhoodnews.com . Retrieved: 8.10.2015. Yacoubian, H., Al-Khatib, L & Mardirossian, T. (2017). Analysis of the Image of Scientists Portrayed in the Lebanese National Science Textbooks. Sci & Educ (2017) 26:513–528, DOI 10.1007/s11191-017-9908-0 Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA:Sage.