Yıl 2018, Cilt 10 , Sayı , Sayfalar 92 - 105 2018-09-12

Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues

Bulent ALAGOZ [1] , Ozkan AKMAN [2]

Discussions on the nature of social reality and the characteristics of a good society, as well as the role of the school in this context, lie at the core of social studies. In this context, the teachers have always been and will always be criticized for the values they did not or were unable to convey from all ideological references. Often deemed a misfortune associated with the fate of teachers, this issue would be an incentive for more efforts in some senses, and poses an obstacle in others. The teachers are often accused of embracing racist and sexist discourses and expressing associated norms of cultural and economic domination on the one hand, and of voicing a sinister secular humanism claimed to lay the foundations of the superiority of capitalism and its democracy. In this context, the roles the teachers are required to assume in the discussion of controversial issues in their daily classes is a hot topic. This paper aims to present four critical perspectives regarding controversial issues expressed by teachers. These perspectives are often called exclusive neutrality, exclusive partiality, neutral impartiality and committed impartiality. Studies so far assume committed impartiality to be the most defensible teacher position.

Controversial issues, exclusive neutrality, exclusive partiality, neutral impartiality, committed impartiality
  • Açıkgöz, Ü. K. (2014). Aktif Öğrenme (13. Baskı). İzmir: Biliş Yayıncılık. Akpınar, B., & Aydın, K. (2010). Eğitimde değişim ve öğretmenlerin değişim algıları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 32(144), 71-80. Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67-92. Apple, M. W. (1982). Education and power. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Apple, M. W., & Weis, L. (Eds) (1983). Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Arnon, R., Shani, M., & Zeiger, T. (1999). Teacher thinking about their profession. Tel Aviv: Beir Beri College. Arnot, M. (1981). Class, gender and education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Balcı. A. (1988). "Etkili Okul". Eğitim ve Bilim, 12(70), 21-30. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall. Barnes, D. (1995). Talking and learning in classrooms: An introduction. Primary Voices K-6, 3(1), 2-7. Bauman, Z. (1989). Legislators and Interpreters on Modernity, Post-modernity and Intellectuals. Polity Press. Bela. H. B. (1968). "Instructional Systems". Fearon Publishers. California. Bereiter, C. (1973). Must we educate? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall . Berlak, A. (1985). Back to the basics: Liberatory pedagogy and the liberal arts. Thought and Action, Spring. Bernstein, R. J. (1978). The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Bramald, R., Hardman, F., & Leat, D. (1995). Initial teacher trainees and their views of teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 23-31. Brandt, R. B. (1959). Ethical theory: The problems of normative and critical ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall. Brophy, J. (1979). Teacher behavior and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733-750. Bullough, R. V., Gitlin, A. D., & Goldstein, S. L. (1984). Ideology, teacher role, and resistance. Bullough, R. V., Goldstein, L., & Holt, L. (1984). Human interests in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press . Butts, R. F. (1980). The revival of civic learning: A rationale for citizenship in American schools. Bloomington, IN : Phi Delta Kappa. Cagan, E. (1978). Individualism, collectivism and radical educational reform. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 227-266. Cain, P. (1999). Controversial issues: A case for neutrality? Nurse Education Today, 19, 159-163. Calderhead, J., & Robson, M. (1991). Images of teaching: Student teachers’ early conceptions of classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 1-8. Cherryholmes, C . H. (1980) . Social knowledge and citizenship education: Two views of truth and criticism, Curriculum Inquiry, 10, 115-141. Cohen, B. (1982). Means and ends in education. London: George Allen & Unwin. Coleman, J. S. (1972). Youth: Transition to adulthood. Report of the Panel on Youth of the President's Science Advisory Committee. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Combs, A. W., Blume, R. A., Newman, A. J., & Wass, H. L. (1977). The professional education of teachers: A humanistic approach to teacher preparation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Conrad, D., & Hedin, D. (1981). Executive summary of experimental education evaluation project. Minnesota: Center for Youth Development and Research. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of research in science teaching, 37(9), 916-937. Çakmak, M. (2001). Etkili Öğretimin Gerçekleşmesinde Öğretmenin Rolü. Çağdaş Eğitim, 274, 22-26. Çelikten, M. (2006). Kültür ve Öğretmen Metaforları. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(2), 269-283. Day, D. (1983). Agreeing to differ: The logic of pluralism. In F. Coffield & R. Goodings (Eds.), Sacred cows in education. University of Durham: Edinburgh University Press. Dewey, J. (1938). The school and society. The University of Chicago Press. Dewey, J. E. (1944). Democracy and education. Toronto: Macmillan. Eeds, M., & Wells, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An expla- nation of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23(1), 4-29. Elliott, J. (1973). Neutrality, rationality and the role of the teacher. In R. S. Peters, P. H. Hurst, & H. T. Sockett (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe philosophy of education society of Great Britain. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Fradd, S., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 14-20+42. Doi: 10.2307/1177292 Freedman, L. (1993). Teacher talk: The role of the teacher in literature discussion groups. In K. Pierce & C. Gilles (Eds.), Cycles of meaning: Expanding the potential of talk in learning communities (pp. 219-235). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. London: Herder & Herder. Fujii, T., Kumagai, K., Shimizu, Y., & Sugiyama, Y. (1998). A cross-cultural study of classroom practices based on a common topic. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 17, 185–194. Furlong, J. J., & Carroll, W. J. (1990). Teacher neutrality and teaching of ethical issues. The Educational Forum, 54, 157-168. Gavelek, J. R., & Raphael, T. E. (1996). Changing talk about text: New roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73(3), 182-192. Genovese, E. (1972). Roll, Jordan, roll: The world the slaves made. New York: Vintage. Giroux, H. A. (1983a). Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the oppostion. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey. Giroux, H. A. (1983b). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Education Review, 53, 257-293. Goble, F. G., & Brooks, B. D. (1983). The case for character education. Ottawa, IL : Green Hill Publishers. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill. Greenbaum, W. (1974). America in search of a new ideal: An essay on the rise of pluralism. Harvard Educational Review, 44, 411-440. Gülpınar, A. (2005). Beyin/Zihin Temelli Öğrenme İlkeleri ve Eğitimde Yapılandırmacı Modeller. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 5(2), 271-306. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowlege and human interests. Trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro. New York: Beacon Press. Hacat, S. O. (2018a). Assessment of the Basic Law Lesson Consistent with the Opinions of Social Studies Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(1), 103-110. Hacat, S. O. (2018b). Opinions of Middle School Students on the Justice Concept within the Framework of Social Studies Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(2), 210. Hesapçıoğlu, M. (2001). Postmodern Toplumda Eğitim, Okul ve İnsan Hakları. İstanbul: Sedar Yayıncılık. Hill, B. V. (1982). Faith at the blackboard: Issues confronting the Christian teacher. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Inbar, D. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 28(1), 77–92. Johnson, M. (1990). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1 Edition. Kalın, Ö. U. (2017b). Analysis of 7 th Grade Social Studies Course Book According to Different Readability Formulas. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4). Kelly, D. M., & Brandes, G. M. (2001). Shifting out of" neutral": Beginning teachers' struggles with teaching for social justice. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'education, 26(4), 437-454. Kelly, T. E. (1986). Discussing controversial issues: Four perspectives on the teacher's role. Theory & Research in Social Education, 14(2), 113-138. Koçoğlu, E. (2013). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının, Okul Yöneticilerinde Olması Gereken Demokratik Tutum Ve Davranışlara İlişkin Görüşleri. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(6). Koçoğlu, E. (2014). Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Kazanımlarının Kültürel Yaşam Üzerindeki Etkilerine İlişkin Öğretmen Algıları. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities (mjh. akdeniz. edu. tr) IV/2, 191-204. Koçoğlu, E. (2015). Social Studies Teachers' Perspective of Religion Education in Turkey. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1). Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of eduction. San Francisco: Harper & Row. Korkut, F. (2005). Öğrenci gelişimsel özellikleri açısından inceleme. Yeni Öğretim Programlarını İnceleme ve Değerlendirme Raporu içinde. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/91065 adresinden 16 Mart 2018 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary Science Journal, 94(5), 483-497. DOI: 10.1086/461779. Kuhn T. S. (2003). Bilimsel devrimlerin yapısı (çev. N. Kuyaş). İstanbul: Alan Yayınları. Kuhn, T. S . (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leming, J. S. (1981). On the limits of rational moral education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 9(1), 7-34. Lickona, T. (1980). What does moral psychology have to say to the teacher of ethics? In d. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press. Lockwood, A., & Harris, D. (1985). Reasoning with democratic values: Ethical problems in United States history. Vol. I, II and Instructors Manual. New York: Teachers College Press. Lucas, C. (1983). Positivist socio-pathology and the contemporary plight of the humanities. The humanities in education: Rebirth or burial in the 1980's. Ann Arbor, MI: Prakken, 20-30. Macklin, R. (1980). Problems in the teaching of ethics: Pluralism and indoctrination. In D. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press. Magnusson, S., & Palincsar, A. (1995). Learning environments as a site of science education reform: An illustration using interdisciplinary guided inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 34, 43-50. May, P. R. (1983). The teaching of moral values. In F. Coffield & R. Goodings (Eds.), Sacred cows in education. University of Durham: Edinburgh University Press. McNeil, L. M. (1983). Defensive teaching and classroom control. In M. W. Apple & L. Weis (Eds.), Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Mosher, R. (1982). Curricula and programs in secondary school which positively influence adolescents' development: Where there's the will, there's a way. In F. M. Newmann & C. E. Sleeter (Eds.), Adolescent development and secondary schooling. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin R & D Center. Newmann, F. M., & Kelly, T. E. (1983). Human dignity and excellence in education: Guidelines for curriculum policy. Washington, DC: Report to the National Institute of Education. Newmann, F. M., & Oliver, D. W. (1970). Clarifying public controversy: An approach to teaching social studies. Boston: Little, Brown. Newmann, F. M., Bertocci, T. A., & Landsness, R. M. (1977). Skills in citizen action: An English-social studies program for secondary schools. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Co. Newmann, F. M . (1977a). Alternative approaches to citizenship education: A search for authenticity. In B. F. Brown (Ed.), Education for responsible citizenship. New York: McGraw-Hill. Newmann, F. M. (1977b). Building a rationale for civic education. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Building rationales for citizenship education. Washington, DC : National Council for the Social Studies, Bulletin #52. Newmann, F. M. (1981). Reducing alienation in high schools: Implications of theory. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 546-564. Newmann, F. M . (1985). The radical perspective on social studies: A synthesis and critique. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31(1), 1-18. Newmann, F. M. (1975). Education for citizen action: Challenges for secondary curriculum. Berkeley: McCutchan. O'Brien, J., & Howard, J. A. (1996). To be or not to be: The paradox of value neutrality and responsible authority. Teaching sociology, 24(3), 326-330. DOI: 10.2307/1318749. Oğuz, O., Oktay, A. ve Ayhan, H. (2010). 21. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Türk Eğitim Sistemi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Özdemir, A. Ş., & Çanakçı, O. (2005). Okul Deneyimi I dersinin öğretmen adaylarının öğretim-öğrenme kavramlarına ve öğretmen-öğrenci rollerine bakış açıları üzerindeki etkileri. İlköğretim-online, 4(1), 73-80. Özden, Y. (2013). Eğitimde Yeni Değerler-Eğitimde Dönüşüm. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Özkiraz, A. (2003). Modernleşme Teorileri ve Postmodern Durum. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi. Peretz, M. B., Mendelsona, N, & Kronb, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles, Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 277–290. Perkinson, H. (1984). Learning from our mistakes: A reinterpretation of twentieth century educational theory. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. Polanyi, M. (1974). Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Raphael, T. E., & Goatley, V. J. (1994). The teacher as "more knowledgeable other": Changing roles for teaching in al- ternative reading instruction programs. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Multidimensional aspects of literacy research, theory and practice (pp. 527-536). Chicago: National Reading Conference. Raywid, M. A. (1980). The discovery and rejection of indoctrination. Educational Theory, 30(1), 1-10. Rosen, B. (1980). The teaching of ethics in undergraduate nonethics courses. In D. Callahan & S. Bok (Eds.), Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making inequality. New York: Wiley. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938). Literature as exploration. New York: Appleton-Century. Ross, W. D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories (Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education). Springer. Roth, W.-M., Boutonné, S., McRobbie, C.J., & K.B. Lucas. (1999). One class, many worlds. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 59-77. Roup, R. R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (Eds.). (1992). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. & Outson, J., & Smith, A. (1982). Fifteen thousand hours. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Saban, A. (2004). “Giriş Düzeyindeki Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının “Öğretmen” Kavramına İlişkin İleri Sürdükleri Metaforlar. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 131- 155. Sennett, R. (1993). Authority. W. W. Norton & Company. Sevinç, M. (2005). Erken Çocuklukta Gelişim ve Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşımlar. İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yayınları. Shimizu, Y. (1999). Aspects of mathematics teacher education in Japan: Focusing on teachers' roles. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 107-116. Sichel, B. A. (1982). Value education for an age of crisis. Washington, DC: University Press of America. Soder, R. (1998). Studying the education of educators: What we can learn fromother professions. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(4), 299–305. Solomon, J. (1989). The social construction of school science. Doing science: Images of science in science education, 126-136. Stenhouse, L. (1972). The idea of neutrality. Times Educational Supplement, 4(2). Sünbül, A. M. (1996). Öğretmen Niteliği ve Öğretimdeki Rolleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(4), 592-608. Taxel, J. (1984). The American revolution in children's fiction: An analysis of historical meaning and narrative structure. Curriculum Inquiry, 14, 7-55. Teacher's College Record, 86, 339-358. Tinker, R. (1997). Thinking about science. https://concord.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/pdf/ThAbSci.pdf adresinden 24.03.2018 tarihinde indirilmiştir. Ulu Kalin, Ö. (2017a). Creating Interactive Student Workbook for Primary Education Social Studies Class and Researching Its Efficiency. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(12), 33-40. Villaume, S. K., Worden, T., Williams, S., Hopkins, L., & Rosenblatt, C. (1994). Five teachers in search of a discussion. The Reading Teacher, 47(6), 480-487. Warren, B., Rosebery, A., & Conant, F. (1989). Cheche konnen: Science literacy in language minority classrooms. Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Mass. ERIC Identifier: ED326060. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Wiencek, J., & O'Flahavan, J. F. (1994). From teacher-led to peer discussions about literature: Suggestions for making the shift. Language Arts, 71(7), 488-498. Will, G. F. (1983). Statecraft as soulcraft: What government does. New York: Simon & Schuster. Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor. How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press. Wood, G. H. (1985). Education for democratic participation: Democratic values and the nuclear freeze campaign. Theory and Research in Social Education, 12(4), 39-56. Young, M. F. D. (Ed.) (1971). Knowledge and control. London: Collier-Macmillan.
Birincil Dil en
Bölüm Articles

Yazar: Bulent ALAGOZ

Yazar: Ozkan AKMAN


Yayımlanma Tarihi : 12 Eylül 2018

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { epess459579, journal = {The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences}, issn = {}, eissn = {2587-1730}, address = {}, publisher = {ISRES Organizasyon Turizm Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd. Şti.}, year = {2018}, volume = {10}, pages = {92 - 105}, doi = {}, title = {Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues}, key = {cite}, author = {ALAGOZ, Bulent and AKMAN, Ozkan} }
APA ALAGOZ, B , AKMAN, O . (2018). Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences , 10 () , 92-105 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epess/issue/39111/459579
MLA ALAGOZ, B , AKMAN, O . "Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues". The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 10 (2018 ): 92-105 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/epess/issue/39111/459579>
Chicago ALAGOZ, B , AKMAN, O . "Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues". The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 10 (2018 ): 92-105
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues AU - Bulent ALAGOZ , Ozkan AKMAN Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 92 EP - 105 VL - 10 IS - SN - -2587-1730 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues %A Bulent ALAGOZ , Ozkan AKMAN %T Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues %D 2018 %J The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences %P -2587-1730 %V 10 %N %R %U
ISNAD ALAGOZ, Bulent , AKMAN, Ozkan . "Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues". The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences 10 / (Eylül 2018): 92-105 .
AMA ALAGOZ B , AKMAN O . Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues. EPESS. 2018; 10: 92-105.
Vancouver ALAGOZ B , AKMAN O . Four Views of Teachers Discussing Controversial Issues. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences. 2018; 10: 105-92.