Urban Streets from the Perspetive of the Youth

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 11 , 184 - 191, 01.12.2018

Tugba Duzenlı Sema Mumcu Elif Merve Alpak

Öz

The success of urban open spaces is relative to their ability
to address the needs of different user groups. Thus, open urban spaces should
be designed in consideration of different needs of different user groups. Young
individuals are among important users whose needs need to be identified, and
their spatial use is different from the rest of the society. In everyday life,
streets are significant spaces for young individuals and are effective on their
development. Young individuals consider streets are spaces where they contact
others. Thus, the present study aimed to scrutinize the streets in urban area
based on their use by young individuals. The 4 most intensely occupied streets in Trabzon, Maraş
Street, Kunduracılar Street, Uzunsokak and Tanjant Street were examined in the
present study. Behavioral observations were conducted on these streets in the
study and which spatial elements were used by young individuals and intended
use of these elements were determined. In other words, the facilities that
these streets offer to young individuals were identified. In the study 246
young individuals were observed and the findings demonstrated that these
individuals utilized the street pavement, walls, curbs, benches and shop fronts
to conduct activities such as chatting, sitting, leisure, hanging out and
spending time with friends.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Urban streets, Youth, Spatial elements

Kaynakça

• Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press Bredow, K.W. (2006). Gathering spaces: Designing places for adolescents, faculty of the Virginia polytechnic institute and state university. Master of Landscape Architecture. Büküşoğlu, N. & Bayturan A.F. (2005). Serbest zaman etkinliklerinin gençlerin psiko-sosyal durumlarına ilişkin algısı üzerindeki rolü (The role of leısure tıme actıvıtıes on the concept related to the psycho - socıal development of the youth). Ege Tıp Dergisi, 44, 3,173 - 177. Culp, R. H. (1998). Adolescent girls and outdoor recreation: A case study examining constraints and effective programming. Journal of Leisure Research, 30(3), 356. Driskell, D. (2002). Creating better cities with children and youth. Unesco. Düzenli T., Mumcu S. & Özdemir I. B., (2016a). Gençlerin ihtiyaçlarına bağlı olarak kamüus açık mekan Tasarımı, İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6, 121-130. Düzenli T., Mumcu, S.,Yılmaz S. & Özbilen A. (2012). Analyzing youth’s activity patterns in campus open spaces depending on their personal and social needs, Journal of Adult Development 19(4):201-214. Düzenli T., Yilmaz S. & Var M. (2016b). Gençlere yönelik peyzaj tasarımı: Trabzon Haluk Ulusoy spor tesisleri, İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6, No.14, 1-15. Düzenli, T., Alpak, E. M., & Özbilen, A. (2017a). Gençlerin kampüs açık mekân kullanımlarına mekânsal özelliklerin etkisi: KTÜ Kanuni Kampüsü örneği. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2417-2435. doi:10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4661 Düzenli, T., Bayramoğlu, E. & Özbilen, A (2010). Needs and preferences of adolescent in open urban spaces. Scientific Research and Essay 5(2):201-216. Düzenli, T., Mumcu S. & Akyol, D. (2017b). Üniversite kampüsü açık mekânlarının gençler tarafından kullanım amaçlarının belirlenmesi, The Journal of International Social Research, 10,766-772. Gibson, J.J., (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Hart, D. & Fegley, S. (1995). Prosocial Behavior and Caring in Adolescence: Relations to Self-understanding and Social Judgment. Child Development, 66, 1346-1359. Hartup, W. W. (1992). Having friends, making friends and keeping friends: Relationships as educational contexts. ERIC Digest ED345854. Hultsman, J. & Harper, W. (1992). Interpreting leisure as text: the part. Leisure Studies, 11(2), 135-146. Iso-Ahola, S.E. & Crowley, B.D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of Leisure Research. 23. (3). pp.260-271. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169-182. Lang, J. (1987). Creating architectural theory; The role of the behavioural sciences in environmental design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press. Owens, P.E. (1994). Teen Places in Sunshine, Australia: Then and Now, Landscape Architecture Department of Environmental Design, University of California. Children’s Environments, 11, 4. Piko B.F. & Vazsonyi, A.T. (2004). Leisure Activities and Problem Behaviours Among Hungarian Youth, Journal of Adolescense. 27, 717-73. Studer R. G. (1969). The dynamics of behavior-contingent physical systems. In G. Broadbent G. &A. Ward (Eds.), Design methods in architecture. Architectural Association Paper Number 4 (pp.55-70). New York: George Wittenberg. Utne, E. (1994). Are you grown-up yet? Utne Reader, 64 (July/ August), 2. Versteeg, E. (2003). Planning and Design of Open Space to Promote Adolescent Development, Master of Landscape Architecture, The University of Guelph.