Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Teachers’ Knowledge and their Perceived Competency in Integrated STEM Concepts: Implications on National and Global Trends

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 14 , 47 - 54, 20.09.2019

Öz

This
study was carried out to investigate science teachers’ perceived competency and
their knowledge in the implementation of Integrated STEM
in Gusau
Local Government of Zamfara State, Nigeria. Descriptive and causal
non-experimental design was adopted for the study. Three research questions
were raised and answered using descriptive statistic, while Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) and t-test were used in testing the formulated hypotheses at
P<0.05 probability level. The data was collected using two research
instruments; Perceived Competency
Questionnaire (PCQ) and Performance Test on Integrated STEM (PTIS) which were validated
by experts and have reliability coefficient of 0.78 and 0.81 respectively. Both
were administered to 37 science teachers who were purposively sampled from two
Science and one Technical school in Gusau. The findings revealed that, the
perception held by science teachers about their competence in implementing
Integrated STEM curriculum at secondary school level was relatively high.
However, difference was found between
their
perceived competency and their performance in Integrated STEM unit, and this
varies according to their subject specializations. It was recommended that,
government should look into the possibility of introducing Integrated STEM
curriculum in Nigerian schools and also train science teachers in that regard
so as to align them with global trends in STEM education.

Kaynakça

  • Asunda, Paul A. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for STEM Integration Into Curriculum Through Career and Technical Education, Journal of STEM Teacher Education: 49(1). Retrieved on 12/1/2019 from http://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/jste/vol49/iss1/4 Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press. Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved on 21/1/2019 from http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning. 7(2):63-74. Krejcie R. V. And Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Journal of Educational and Psychologiccal measurement, 30: 609-610. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: What form? What function p.1–11 Retrieved on 6/2/2019 from: http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf. Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education.Retrieved on 6/7/2018 from: http://www.currtechintegratis.com/pdf/STEMEducation Article4.pdf. National Research Council [NRC] (2001). Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved on 24/12/2018 from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/about/successfulK-12education.html National Research Council (2012). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. Okpala,P.N. (2012). Reforms in Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Keynote Address STAN 54th Conference. Quang, L. X.; Hoang, L. H.; Chuan, V. D.; Nam, N. H.; Anh, N. T. T. and Nhung, V. T. H. (2015).Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 11(2): 1-12. Roberts, A. and Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum. Department of STEM Education and Professional Studies Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, U.S.A. Sagadin, J. (1993). Pedagogical Research Methodology, Ljubljana, Institute for Sport and Education of the Republic of Slovenia. Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., and Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components, Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania. Ugo, E. A. and Akpoghol,T. V. (2016). Improving Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Programs in Secondary Schools in Benue State Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3 (3): 6-16.
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 14 , 47 - 54, 20.09.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Asunda, Paul A. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for STEM Integration Into Curriculum Through Career and Technical Education, Journal of STEM Teacher Education: 49(1). Retrieved on 12/1/2019 from http://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/jste/vol49/iss1/4 Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press. Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Paper presented at the 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia. Retrieved on 21/1/2019 from http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning. 7(2):63-74. Krejcie R. V. And Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Journal of Educational and Psychologiccal measurement, 30: 609-610. Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: What form? What function p.1–11 Retrieved on 6/2/2019 from: http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf. Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education.Retrieved on 6/7/2018 from: http://www.currtechintegratis.com/pdf/STEMEducation Article4.pdf. National Research Council [NRC] (2001). Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved on 24/12/2018 from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/about/successfulK-12education.html National Research Council (2012). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academic Press. Okpala,P.N. (2012). Reforms in Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Keynote Address STAN 54th Conference. Quang, L. X.; Hoang, L. H.; Chuan, V. D.; Nam, N. H.; Anh, N. T. T. and Nhung, V. T. H. (2015).Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 11(2): 1-12. Roberts, A. and Cantu, D. (2012). Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum. Department of STEM Education and Professional Studies Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, U.S.A. Sagadin, J. (1993). Pedagogical Research Methodology, Ljubljana, Institute for Sport and Education of the Republic of Slovenia. Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., and Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components, Intermediate Unit 1 and Carnegie Mellon, Pennsylvania. Ugo, E. A. and Akpoghol,T. V. (2016). Improving Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Programs in Secondary Schools in Benue State Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3 (3): 6-16.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Akilu Isma’ıl Bu kişi benim

Abdullahi Bello Bu kişi benim

Suleiman Bashır Bu kişi benim

Umar Sodangı Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 20 Eylül 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 14

Kaynak Göster

APA Isma’ıl, A., Bello, A., Bashır, S., Sodangı, U. (2019). Teachers’ Knowledge and their Perceived Competency in Integrated STEM Concepts: Implications on National and Global Trends. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 14, 47-54.