Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 18 , 65 - 68, 31.12.2020

Abstract

References

  • Bacanak, A., Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Sacit, K. (2003). Yeni bir bakış: Eğitimde teknoloji okuryazarlığı. Pamukkale üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 14(14), 191-196.
  • Doğan, N., Çakıroğlu, J., Çavuş, S., Bilican, K., & Arslan, O. (2011). Öğretmenlerin bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşlerinin geliştirilmesi: Hizmetiçi eğitim programının etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(40), 127-139.
  • Kılıç, G. B., Haymana, F., & Bozyılmaz, B. (2010). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı’nın bilim okuryazarlığı ve bilimsel süreç becerileri açısından analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(150), 52-63.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2002). Science and technology education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Innovations in science and technology education, 8, 296-307.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

The Effect of Science and Technology on Social Change According to the Views of Social Studies Prospective Teachers

Year 2020, Volume: 18 , 65 - 68, 31.12.2020

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effect of science and technology on social change according to the views of social studies prospective teachers. The research was designed in accordance with the phenomenology pattern, which is one of the qualitative research designs. The research participants were determined according to the criterion sampling, one of the purposeful sampling methods. The research participants consisted of 48 students who received the science, technology, and society course in the social studies teaching undergraduate program. The research data were collected by employing the interview method. Interviews were conducted with the participants via a semi-structured interview form. Expert opinions were obtained in creating the semi-structured interview form. As a result of the expert opinions, the interview form consisted of five questions. The data obtained in the research were analyzed by the content analysis technique. It was concluded that for the question of what science is, participants mostly responded that it is technology, experiment, observation, invention, generating ideas, finding solutions. For the question of what technology is, the research participants mostly replied that it is innovation, modernity, convenience, development, and humans being superior to nature. For the question of what the positive effects of science and technology on social change might be, the participants mostly gave the answer that it contributed to many areas such as the development of communication, facilitating life, contributing to the development of society, modernization, easier access to information, Internet, education, transportation, and medicine.

References

  • Bacanak, A., Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Sacit, K. (2003). Yeni bir bakış: Eğitimde teknoloji okuryazarlığı. Pamukkale üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 14(14), 191-196.
  • Doğan, N., Çakıroğlu, J., Çavuş, S., Bilican, K., & Arslan, O. (2011). Öğretmenlerin bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşlerinin geliştirilmesi: Hizmetiçi eğitim programının etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(40), 127-139.
  • Kılıç, G. B., Haymana, F., & Bozyılmaz, B. (2010). İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi öğretim programı’nın bilim okuryazarlığı ve bilimsel süreç becerileri açısından analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(150), 52-63.
  • Sjøberg, S. (2002). Science and technology education: Current challenges and possible solutions. Innovations in science and technology education, 8, 296-307.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
There are 5 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tugba Kafadar This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 18

Cite

APA Kafadar, T. (2020). The Effect of Science and Technology on Social Change According to the Views of Social Studies Prospective Teachers. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 18, 65-68.