Classroom-based and Online-based Evaluation of Students and Comparative Analysis of Their Achievements in both Scenarios

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 23 , 83 - 87, 31.12.2021

Vladimir Kuzmanovıć Sanda Baljoševıć

https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1071436

Öz

The COVID19 pandemic made a significant impact on every aspect of everyday life. Educational systems around the world applied different strategies in fighting the limitations imposed by their governments. Some countries opted to continue normal schooling while applying all epidemic measures, some opted for online schooling, some to tele-schooling and others applied combined regime of schooling. The educational system in the Republic of Serbia in the school year 2020/2021 was organized as a combination of standard classroom-based teaching with all epidemic measures and television-based distance teaching-learning. After the epidemic situation worsened, all schools shifted to online-based distance teaching-learning. In this paper we will explain the student evaluation process in both the combined regime of schooling and in the online distance teaching of mathematics in elementary school “Ujedinjene nacije” in Belgrade, Serbia. Also, we will introduce the mathematics teaching methodology and evaluation methodology applied in both cases. After that, we will compare the student achievements in both classroom-based and online-based evaluation and discuss problems we encountered during the evaluation in both scenarios. Finally, we will draw conclusions on evaluation methodology and obtained results and propose possible solutions to the problems we were faced with.

Anahtar Kelimeler

mathematics teaching methodology, student evaluation, distance teaching-learning

Kaynakça

• Alsoud, A. R., & Harasis, A. A., (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student’s e-learning experience in Jordan. Journal of theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1404-1414.
• Dhawan, S., (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Information and Technology Education Research, 15, 157-190.
• Jackson, C., Mangtani, P., Hawker, J., Olowokure, B., & Vynnycky, E. (2014). The effects of school closures on influenza outbreaks and pandemics: systematic review of studies”. PLoS ONE, 9(5), 1-10.
• Jin, Y. Q., Lin, C., Zhao, Q., Yu, S., & Su, Y., (2021). A study on traditional teaching method transferring to e-learning under the Covid-19 pandemic: from Chinese students’ perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-14.
• Kim, K., & Bonk, C. J., (2006). The future of online teaching and learning in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 22-30.
• Kuzmanović, V., (2021). Online teaching and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on student achievements in higher education. Journal of International Scientific Publications: Educational Alternatives, 19, 115-121.
• Kuzmanović, V., & Baljošević, S. (2021). Use of digital ink in teaching mathematics online. Proceedings from KMI21: The 7th Conference with International Participation on Knowledge, Management and Informatics, Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia.
• Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever: This is how. World Economic Forum
• Mackenzie, J. S., & Smith, D. W. (2020). COVID-19: a novel zoonotic disease caused by coronavirus form China: what we know and what we don’t. Microbiology Australia, 41(1), 45-50.
• .Ruth Evangelin, K., (2020). Impact of students on E-learning during COVID ’19. Journal of Critical Review, 7(11), 1737-1739.
• Sapp, D. A., & Simon, J. (2005). Comparing grades in online and face-to-face writing courses: Interpersonal accountability and institutional commitment. Computers and Composition, 22(4), 471-489.