Academic Jealousy Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
Abstract
This study aims to develop a measurement tool to determine the level of academic jealousy. For this purpose, firstly, the literature was examined, and a theoretical framework was formed, and then an item set of 47 items was created. The items that were submitted to expert opinion were eliminated and corrected, and 41 items were decided to use, and a trial form was obtained. In this study, 478 university students were reached. One-on-one interviews were conducted with ten students who are studying at Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University before the trial application. Then, the trial form was applied to 254 university students, and the data obtained were analyzed with Exploratory Factor Analysis, and as a result of this analysis, a structure with three factors (maturity, self-denigration, and envy) was revealed. In order to test the defined structure, the final form of the scale was applied to another group of 154 people, and the data obtained were subjected to Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and goodness of fit indices of the scale was found to be between good fit or acceptable fit. Accordingly, the structure with 19-item and three factors was confirmed Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the whole scale was found .779, Envy subfactor was found .840; self-denigration subfactor was found .840 and Maturity subfactor was found .817. In order to determine the reliability of the scale in terms of stability, the scale was applied to a different group of 57 people at two-week intervals, and the correlation between the two applications was recorded as .89. It was concluded that the Academic Jealousy Scale developed according to these findings, is a valid measurement tool and will give reliable scores in measuring academic jealousy.
Keywords
References
- Afifi, W. A., & Reichert, T. (1996). Understanding the role of uncertainty in jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 9, 93-103.
- Anderson, R. E. (2002). Envy and jealousy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56 (4), 455-480.
- Aune, K. S., & Comstock, J. (1991). Experience and expression of jealousy: Comparison between friends and romantics. Psychological Reports, 69, 315-319.
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
- Brehm, S.S. (1992). Intimate relationships. NY:McGraw Hill.
- Bringle, R. G., Roach, S., Andler, C., & Evenbeck, S. (1979). Measuring the intensity of jealousy reactions. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 9, 23-24.
- Bringle, R. G., & Williams, L. J. (1979). Parental off-spring similarity on jealousy and related personality dimensions. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 265-286.
- Buunk, B., & Bringle, R. G. (1987). Jealousy in love relationships. D. Perlman ve S. Duck (der.), Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration içinde, s. 123-147. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Duygu Koçak
0000-0003-3211-0426
Türkiye
Publication Date
December 13, 2019
Submission Date
May 17, 2019
Acceptance Date
October 31, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 10 Number: 4
Cited By
Arcane Language of Human Emotions: Envy and Jealousy in Academia
National Journal of Community Medicine
https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.130920222197Zonation system in admission of new student at state secondary school in Indonesia: how predictable to learning success
The Education and science journal
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-8-115-133Counting others’ blessings: the impact of envy on university instructors’ relationships: a mixed-methods study
SN Social Sciences
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01327-6