Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2016, Sayı: 2, 82 - 93, 01.09.2016

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Alvarez, R. A., Paranhos, E., Air Pollution Issues Associated with Natural Gas and Oil Operations, Air & Waste Management Association EM 22-25, June 2012. 2. Clark, D., Q&A: Shale gas and fracking, The Guardian, 17 April 2012, www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/17/shale-gas-fracking-uk, retrieved on 26.04.2016. 3. Cooley, H., Donnelly, K., Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction, Pacific Institute, June 2012. 4. Coons, T., Walker, R., Community Health Risk Analysis of Oil and Gas Industry Impacts in Garfield County, 2008. 5. Dernbach, J. C., May, J. R., Can Shale Gas Help Accelerate the Transition to Sustainability?, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, January-February 2015, www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2015/January-February%202015/shale-gas-full.html, retrieved on 06.04.2016. 6. Glass, D. C., C. N. Gray, et al., Health Watch exposure estimates: do they underestimate benzene exposure?, Chemico-Biological Interactions 153-154: 23-32, 2005. 7. Gottschalk, K. et al., Exploring the Environmental Effects of Shale Gas Development in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, STAC Publication 13-01, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Workshop Report, April 11-12, 2012. 8. Hoffman, A., Olsson, G., Lindström, A. 2014. Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing: Framing the Water Issue. Report Nr. 34. SIWI, Stockholm. 9. Kemball-Cook, S.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Grant, J.; Parker, L.; Jung, J.; Santamaria, W.; Mathews, J.; Yarwood, G. Ozone Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Haynesville Shale; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9357. 10. Kongsnes, E., Shale gas drinking water pollution proven, Stavanger Aftenblad, 28.09.2012, www.aftenbladet.no/energi/aenergy/Shale-gas-drinking-water-pollution-proven-3039417.html, retrieved on 06.04.2016. 11. McKenzie, L. M., Witter, R. Z., Newman, L. S., Adgate, J. L., Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 424, 1 May 2012, Pages 79–87. 12. Olsen, E., Natural Gas and Polluted Air, New York Times, 26.02.2011, www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000000650773/natgas.html, retrieved on 01.05.2016. 13. Rozell, D. J., Reaven, S. J., Water Pollution Risk Associated with Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale, Risk Analysis, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01757.x. 14. Shogren, E., Air Quality Concerns Threaten Natural Gas's Image, 21.06.2011, www.npr.org/2011/06/21/137197991/air-quality-concerns-threaten-natural-gas-image, retrieved on 01.05.2016. 15. Stevens, P., The ‘Shale Gas Revolution’: Developments and Changes, Chatham House Briefing Paper, August 2012. 16. Walther, E., Screening Health Risk Assessment Sublette County, Wyoming, Sierra Research, Inc., January 2011. 17. Whitelet, T., Doty, T., Barnett Shale Formation Area Monitoring Projects; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Mobile Monitoring Operations Division, Austin, TX, 2009. 18. Witter, R., Stinson, K., Sackett, H., Putter, S., Kinney, G., Teitelbaum, D., Newman, L., Potential Exposure-Related Human Health Effects of Oil and Gas Development: A White Paper, September 15, 2008. 19. Air Quality Control Commission; Regulation Number 7, Section XIX.K, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, www.cdphe.state.co.us/regulations/airregs/5CCR1001-9.pdf, retrieved on 04.04.2016. 20. Draft to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, February 2011, p 14. 21. Energy and Climate Change Committee - Fifth Report, Shale Gas, 10 May 2011, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm, retrieved on 16.04.2016. 22. Formaldehyde (HCHO) CAS 50-00-0; UN 1198, UN 2209 (formalin), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/mmg111.pdf, retrieved on 04.04.2016. 23. Natural Gas STAR Program, www3.epa.gov/gasstar/tools/recommended.html, retrieved on 26.04.2016. 24. New York’s Oil and Natural Gas History – A Long Story, But Not the Final Chapter, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, 2007. 25. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: Turkey, U.S. Energy Information Administration, September 2015. 26. The Water Footprint of Shale Gas Development, EcoWatch, September 10, 2012, ecowatch.com/2012/09/10/the-water-footprint-of-shale-gas-development/, retrieved on 06.04.2016.

A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction

Yıl 2016, Sayı: 2, 82 - 93, 01.09.2016

Öz

Shale gas can still be considered
as one of the hot topics today. Some people believe in the pros of the subject,
whereas some others stand on the cons’ side. Each party is firmly supporting
their own side of the story. It is possible to express that there is more to
the researches that are needed to determine the math about shale gas. The
question of “Are we experiencing a shale gas revolution or is it another earth
polluting source of energy?” is yet to be answered.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Alvarez, R. A., Paranhos, E., Air Pollution Issues Associated with Natural Gas and Oil Operations, Air & Waste Management Association EM 22-25, June 2012. 2. Clark, D., Q&A: Shale gas and fracking, The Guardian, 17 April 2012, www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/apr/17/shale-gas-fracking-uk, retrieved on 26.04.2016. 3. Cooley, H., Donnelly, K., Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction, Pacific Institute, June 2012. 4. Coons, T., Walker, R., Community Health Risk Analysis of Oil and Gas Industry Impacts in Garfield County, 2008. 5. Dernbach, J. C., May, J. R., Can Shale Gas Help Accelerate the Transition to Sustainability?, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, January-February 2015, www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2015/January-February%202015/shale-gas-full.html, retrieved on 06.04.2016. 6. Glass, D. C., C. N. Gray, et al., Health Watch exposure estimates: do they underestimate benzene exposure?, Chemico-Biological Interactions 153-154: 23-32, 2005. 7. Gottschalk, K. et al., Exploring the Environmental Effects of Shale Gas Development in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, STAC Publication 13-01, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee Workshop Report, April 11-12, 2012. 8. Hoffman, A., Olsson, G., Lindström, A. 2014. Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing: Framing the Water Issue. Report Nr. 34. SIWI, Stockholm. 9. Kemball-Cook, S.; Bar-Ilan, A.; Grant, J.; Parker, L.; Jung, J.; Santamaria, W.; Mathews, J.; Yarwood, G. Ozone Impacts of Natural Gas Development in the Haynesville Shale; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9357. 10. Kongsnes, E., Shale gas drinking water pollution proven, Stavanger Aftenblad, 28.09.2012, www.aftenbladet.no/energi/aenergy/Shale-gas-drinking-water-pollution-proven-3039417.html, retrieved on 06.04.2016. 11. McKenzie, L. M., Witter, R. Z., Newman, L. S., Adgate, J. L., Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources, Science of The Total Environment, Volume 424, 1 May 2012, Pages 79–87. 12. Olsen, E., Natural Gas and Polluted Air, New York Times, 26.02.2011, www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000000650773/natgas.html, retrieved on 01.05.2016. 13. Rozell, D. J., Reaven, S. J., Water Pollution Risk Associated with Natural Gas Extraction from the Marcellus Shale, Risk Analysis, DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01757.x. 14. Shogren, E., Air Quality Concerns Threaten Natural Gas's Image, 21.06.2011, www.npr.org/2011/06/21/137197991/air-quality-concerns-threaten-natural-gas-image, retrieved on 01.05.2016. 15. Stevens, P., The ‘Shale Gas Revolution’: Developments and Changes, Chatham House Briefing Paper, August 2012. 16. Walther, E., Screening Health Risk Assessment Sublette County, Wyoming, Sierra Research, Inc., January 2011. 17. Whitelet, T., Doty, T., Barnett Shale Formation Area Monitoring Projects; Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Mobile Monitoring Operations Division, Austin, TX, 2009. 18. Witter, R., Stinson, K., Sackett, H., Putter, S., Kinney, G., Teitelbaum, D., Newman, L., Potential Exposure-Related Human Health Effects of Oil and Gas Development: A White Paper, September 15, 2008. 19. Air Quality Control Commission; Regulation Number 7, Section XIX.K, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, www.cdphe.state.co.us/regulations/airregs/5CCR1001-9.pdf, retrieved on 04.04.2016. 20. Draft to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, February 2011, p 14. 21. Energy and Climate Change Committee - Fifth Report, Shale Gas, 10 May 2011, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmenergy/795/79502.htm, retrieved on 16.04.2016. 22. Formaldehyde (HCHO) CAS 50-00-0; UN 1198, UN 2209 (formalin), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016, www.atsdr.cdc.gov/MHMI/mmg111.pdf, retrieved on 04.04.2016. 23. Natural Gas STAR Program, www3.epa.gov/gasstar/tools/recommended.html, retrieved on 26.04.2016. 24. New York’s Oil and Natural Gas History – A Long Story, But Not the Final Chapter, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, 2007. 25. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: Turkey, U.S. Energy Information Administration, September 2015. 26. The Water Footprint of Shale Gas Development, EcoWatch, September 10, 2012, ecowatch.com/2012/09/10/the-water-footprint-of-shale-gas-development/, retrieved on 06.04.2016.
Toplam 1 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Fatih Temiz Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Temiz, F. (2016). A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction. Energy Policy Turkey(2), 82-93.
AMA Temiz F. A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction. Energy Policy Turkey. Eylül 2016;(2):82-93.
Chicago Temiz, Fatih. “A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction”. Energy Policy Turkey, sy. 2 (Eylül 2016): 82-93.
EndNote Temiz F (01 Eylül 2016) A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction. Energy Policy Turkey 2 82–93.
IEEE F. Temiz, “A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction”, Energy Policy Turkey, sy. 2, ss. 82–93, Eylül 2016.
ISNAD Temiz, Fatih. “A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction”. Energy Policy Turkey 2 (Eylül 2016), 82-93.
JAMA Temiz F. A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction. Energy Policy Turkey. 2016;:82–93.
MLA Temiz, Fatih. “A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction”. Energy Policy Turkey, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 82-93.
Vancouver Temiz F. A Brief Look On The Environmental Effects Of Shale Gas Extraction. Energy Policy Turkey. 2016(2):82-93.

Energy Policy Turkey is a Trade Mark of TESPAM