Examining the Mentoring Process in Collaborative Project-based Learning of Preservice Instructional Technology Teachers

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how special education knowledge and practice can be expanded through mentoring activities. In this respect, an interdisciplinary one-to-many mentorship study with Collaborative Project-based Learning (CPBL) was conducted. The mentors were Special Education faculty members who guided preservice teachers from the Instructional Technology department. During this guiding process, the preservice teachers developed animations for teaching daily life skills to students with intellectual disability (ID). The study followed a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. This current study showed that mentoring with CPBL can be effective in equipping both mentors and mentees with a variety of skills. Specifically, mentoring can be an effective process for preservice teachers to construct context-specific knowledge in educating students with special needs. The study’s quantitative findings showed that the mentors were successful during the mentoring process.

Keywords

• special education
• mentoring
• inclusion
• collaborative project based learning
• preservice teachers

References

1. Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 742-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.004
2. Ambrosetti, A., & Dekkers, J. (2010). The Interconnectedness of the Roles of Mentors and Mentees in Preservice Teacher Education Mentoring Relationships. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.3
3. Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2013). A new vision of mentoring in teacher education. In D. E. Lynch & T. Yeigh (Eds.), Teacher Education in Australia: Investigations into Programming, Practicum and Partnership (pp. 77-93). Oxford Global.
4. Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2014). Maximizing the potential of mentoring: A framework for pre-service teacher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.926662
5. Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016264340201700302
6. Angelides, P., & Mylordou, A. (2011). The beneficial outcome of a successful mentoring relationship: the development of inclusive education. Teacher Development, 15(4), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.642650
7. Baran, E. (2016). Examining the Benefits of a Faculty Technology Mentoring Program on Graduate Students’ Professional Development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1169958
8. Barrett, R. (2002). Mentor supervision and development: Exploration of lived experience. Career Development International, 7(5), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430210440109

9. Berk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200501000-00017
10. Blackwell, J. E. (1989). Mentoring: An action strategy for increasing minority faculty. Academe, 75(5), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/40249734
11. Boyer, I., Maney, B., Kamler, B., & Comber, B. (2004). Reciprocal mentoring across generations: sustaining professional development for English teachers. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 32(2), 139-150. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008765
12. Campbell, M. R., & Brummett, V. M. (2007). Mentoring preservice teachers for development and growth of professional knowledge. Music Educators Journal, 93(3), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002743210709300320
13. Cawyer, C. S., Simonds, C., & Davis, S. (2002). Mentoring to facilitate socialization: The case of the new faculty member. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110111938
14. Civitillo, S., De Moor, J. M., & Vervloed, M. P. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education in the Netherlands: An exploratory study. Support for Learning, 31(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12119
15. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Prentice Hall.
16. Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Utilization of computer technology to facilitate money management by individuals with mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(1), 106-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880189
17. De Boer, A., Pijl, S. C., & Minnaert. A. (2011). Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
18. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H.-K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005
19. Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005) Collaborative Project-based Learning and Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: a Consideration of Tutor and Student Role in Learner-Focused Strategies. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp. 87-98). AISHE/HEA.
20. DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (2005). Youth mentoring, theory, research, and practice. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 2-12). Sage.
21. DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611414806
22. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
23. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Bank.
24. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. (1993). Mentoring in context: A comparison of two U.S. programs for beginning teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 699-718. https://www.education.msu.edu/NCRTL/PDFs/NCRTL/SpecialReports/spring92.pdf
25. Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551
26. Giblin, F., & Lakey, B. (2010). Integrating mentoring and social support research within the context of stressful medical training. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 771-796. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.7.771
27. Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching & Teacher Education, 25(2), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.003
28. Hairon, S., Loh, S. H., Lim, S. P., Govindani, S. N., Tan, J. K. T., & Tay, E. C. J. (2019). Structured mentoring: Principles for effective mentoring. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09251-8
29. Hall, K. M., R., Draper, R. J., Smith, L. K., & Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2008). More than a place to teach: Exploring the perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of mentor teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring, 16(3), 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802231708
30. Healy, L., Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Stewart, D. (2001). Conversations: a means of learning, growth and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005494
31. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Wesley.
32. Hudson, P. (2004). Specific mentoring: a theory and model for developing primary science teaching practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976042000223015
33. Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: ‘growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.749415
34. Hudson, P. (2016). Forming the Mentor-Mentee Relationship. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1163637
35. Hudson, P., & Skamp, K. (2002). Mentoring preservice teachers of primary science. The Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1), Article 7692. https://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7692
36. Huizing, R. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599
37. Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in student’s cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
38. Ishiyama, J. (2007). Expectations and perceptions of undergraduate research mentoring: Comparing first generation, low-income white/Caucasian and African American students. College Student Journal, 41(3), 540-549.
39. Izadinia, M. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship: do they match or clash? Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.994136
40. Jacobowitz, T., & Sudol, K. A. (2010). Literacy strategies that promote democratic skills, attitudes, and behavior in the social studies classroom. Social Studies Research & Practice, 5(3), 62-73.
41. Jones, B. (2019). Good practice: Scaffolded, Collaborative Project-based Learning. Journal of the European Honors Council, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.85
42. Kapp, E. (2009). Improving student teamwork in a collaborative project-based course. College Teaching, 57(3), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.3.139-143
43. Korhonen, H., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Kiviniemi, U., & Tynjala, P. (2017). Student teachers’ experiences of participating in mixed peer mentoring groups of in-service and pre-service teachers in Finland. Teaching & Teacher Education, 61, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.011
44. Lentz, E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Reflections on naturally occurring mentoring relationships. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 158-162). Blackwell.
45. Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23(3), 139-142. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8b47/f05fecb485b85b17d9c371607a3422a822de.pdf
46. Lumpkin, A. (2011). A model for mentoring university faculty. Educational Forum, 75(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.602466
47. Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W. (2009). Special education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701747769
48. Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching & Teacher Education, 66, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.024
49. Metsala, J. L., & Harkins, M. J. (2019). An Examination of Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Beliefs About Inclusive Education. Teacher Education and Special Education. Advance Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419873060
50. Ministry of National Education. (2018). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2018/’19. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_09/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2018_2019.pdf
51. Moberg, S., Muta, E., Korenaga, K., Kuorelahti, M., & Savolainen, H. (2020). Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1615800
52. Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The effects of mentoring relationships on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward academically diverse students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(2), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300202
53. Pamuk, S., & Thompson, A. D. (2009). Development of a technology mentor survey instrument: Understanding student mentors’ benefits. Computers & Education, 53(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.017
54. Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: the effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177-1194. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556344
55. Rakap, S., & Kaczmarek, L. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in Turkey. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903450848
56. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
57. Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007999204543
58. Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008). Impact of training on pre‐service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society, 23(7), 773-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271
59. Thompson, A. (2007). History of the faculty technology mentoring program. In A. D. Thompson, H. Chuang, & I. Sahin (Eds.), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing technology expertise (pp. 29-46). Information Age. . https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cije/issue/4277/57633
60. Volkwein, J. F., King, M. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (1986). Student-faculty relationships and intellectual growth among transfer students. Journal of Higher Education, 57(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778786
61. Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003481
62. Witney, D., & Smallbone, T. (2011). Wiki work: Can using wikis enhance student collaboration for group assignment tasks? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.543765
63. Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., & Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). The Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a
64. Zagona, A. L., Kurth, J. A., & MacFarland, S. Z. C. (2017). Teachers’ views of their preparation for inclusive education and collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40 (3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417692969