Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 35 - 53, 31.12.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95.
  • Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The Effect of Using Online Discussion Forums on Students' Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-Tojet, 16(1), 164-176.
  • Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.
  • Bax, S. (2003). “CALL – past, present and future”, System 31, 1:13-28.
  • Berer, M. & Rinvolucri, M. (1981). MAZES: a problem-solving reader, London: Heinemann.
  • Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text‐based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240.
  • Brierley B. & Kemble I. (1991), Computers as a tool in language teaching, New York: Ellis Horwood.
  • Bush M. & Terry R. (Eds.). (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning, Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Company.
  • Comas-Quinn, Anna, Mardomingo, Raquel & Valentine, Chris (2009). Mobile blogs in language learning: making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(1) pp. 96-112.
  • Cord-Maunoury, B. (2000). Analyse du site Polar FLE. ALSIC, Vol.3, Numéro 2, Décembre, (239-254).
  • Davies G. & Steel D. (1981). First steps in Computer-Assisted Language Learning at Ealing College of Higher Education. Paper presented at the CAL 81 Symposium, University of Leeds, 8-10 April 1981. Published as part of an article, Micros in modern languages, Educational Computing, October 1982: 30-31.
  • Davies, G. & Higgins, J., (1985). Using computers in language learning: a teacher’s guide. London: CILT.
  • Davies G., Walker R., Rendall H. & Hewer S. (2012). Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Module 1.4 in Davies G. (ed.) Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT), Slough, Thames Valley University [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-4.htm [Accessed 07 March 2019].
  • Ducate 1, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  • Hardisty, D. & Windeatt, S., (1989). CALL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Mobile on EFL Learners' Reading Practices in Najran University. English language teaching, 9(5), 8-21.
  • Healey, D. & Johnson, N. (1995a). A brief introduction to CALL. In Healey D. & Johnson N. (eds.). 1995 TESOL CALL Interest Section software list, Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications: iii-vii.
  • Healey D. & Johnson N. (Eds.) (1995b). 1995 TESOL CALL Interest Section software list, Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
  • Higgins, J. J. & Johns, T., (1984). Computers in language learning. London: Collins.
  • Jones, C. & Fortescue, S., (1987). Using computers in the language classroom. Harlow: Longman.
  • Kartal, E. (2005). The Internet and Autonomous Language Learning: A Typology of Suggested Aids. Online Submission, 4(4), 1-7.
  • Kenning M-M. & Kenning M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: current theory and practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.
  • Khoshsima, H., Saed, A., & Arbabi, M. A. (2018). Online teachers’ attitudes toward using technology in teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 134-148.
  • Lancien, T. (1998). Réseau et Français Langue Etrangère" in Conférence Virtuelle sur les Applications des TIC dans l'Enseignement du Français Langue Etrangère,Agence intergouvernementale de la Francophonie, du 7 au 18 Décembre 1998.
  • Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72.
  • Levy M. (1997). CALL: context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context‐aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
  • Orr, M. (2008). Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Call-EJ Online, 9(2).
  • Penning de Vries, B. W., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2019). Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning. Language Teaching Research, 1362168818819027.
  • Pusack J. & Otto S. (1990). Applying instructional technologies. Foreign Language Annals 23, 5: 409-417.
  • Robert, Ed, Taylor. (1980). The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee. American Journal of Physics - AMER J PHYS. 50. 10.1119/1.12996. (Cited in: Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.)
  • Rüschoff, B. (1993). Language learning and information technology: state of the art. CALICO Journal 10, 3: 5-17.
  • Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595-613.
  • Schneider, E.W & Bennion, J.L., (1984). Veni, vidi, vici, via videodisc: a simulator for instructional courseware. In Wyatt, D.H. (ed.). Computer assisted language instruction. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Şengül, M., & Türel, Y. K. (2019). Teaching turkish as a foreign language with interactive whiteboards: a case study of multilingual learners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 101-115.
  • Sun, Y. C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88-103.
  • Tabatabaee, G. A., & Rezvani, E. (2019). Effects of using english podcasts on idioms and vocabulary learning of iranian efl learners. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2(01).
  • Tanner, M., & Landon, M. (2009). The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 51-65.
  • Taylor R. (1980). The computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Taylor M.B. & Perez L.M. (1989). Something to do on a Monday. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
  • Underwood, J. (1984), Linguistics, computers and the language teacher: a communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Ware, P., & O'Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63.
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.
  • Warschauer M. & Healey D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language Teaching 31: 57-71.
  • Warschauer, M., (2000). CALL for the 21st Century. IATEFL and ESADE Conference, 2 July 2000, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.gse.uci.edu/markw/cyberspace.html

A General View on Utilization of Computational Technologies in Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL)

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 35 - 53, 31.12.2019

Öz

Since
the 1960s-1970s, the implementation of Computer-Assisted Language Learning
concept has contributed to the progress made on Foreign Language Learning (FLL)
in numerous ways. It has enabled the teachers and language learners to enrich
the language learning process with improved interactivity with certain learning
materials and gave rise to several opportunities for the development of applications
in further implementation of the concept. At the present time, it is possible
to witness a wide range of software and hardware developed for CALL that are
able to present innovative and creative means for CALL which are, to some
extent, proven successful in engaging foreign language learners with greater
effectiveness. This research has been prepared in efforts of gaining a proper
insight on utilization of the technological means and opportunities in CALL,
and with aims to comprise an idea regarding the effects of the mentioned
technologies which are and were used on CALL. 

Kaynakça

  • Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76-95.
  • Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). The Effect of Using Online Discussion Forums on Students' Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-Tojet, 16(1), 164-176.
  • Armstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.
  • Bax, S. (2003). “CALL – past, present and future”, System 31, 1:13-28.
  • Berer, M. & Rinvolucri, M. (1981). MAZES: a problem-solving reader, London: Heinemann.
  • Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text‐based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240.
  • Brierley B. & Kemble I. (1991), Computers as a tool in language teaching, New York: Ellis Horwood.
  • Bush M. & Terry R. (Eds.). (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning, Lincolnwood, Illinois: National Textbook Company.
  • Comas-Quinn, Anna, Mardomingo, Raquel & Valentine, Chris (2009). Mobile blogs in language learning: making the most of informal and situated learning opportunities. ReCALL, 21(1) pp. 96-112.
  • Cord-Maunoury, B. (2000). Analyse du site Polar FLE. ALSIC, Vol.3, Numéro 2, Décembre, (239-254).
  • Davies G. & Steel D. (1981). First steps in Computer-Assisted Language Learning at Ealing College of Higher Education. Paper presented at the CAL 81 Symposium, University of Leeds, 8-10 April 1981. Published as part of an article, Micros in modern languages, Educational Computing, October 1982: 30-31.
  • Davies, G. & Higgins, J., (1985). Using computers in language learning: a teacher’s guide. London: CILT.
  • Davies G., Walker R., Rendall H. & Hewer S. (2012). Introduction to Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Module 1.4 in Davies G. (ed.) Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT), Slough, Thames Valley University [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-4.htm [Accessed 07 March 2019].
  • Ducate 1, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.
  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer assisted language learning, 27(1), 70-105. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  • Hardisty, D. & Windeatt, S., (1989). CALL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hazaea, A. N., & Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Mobile on EFL Learners' Reading Practices in Najran University. English language teaching, 9(5), 8-21.
  • Healey, D. & Johnson, N. (1995a). A brief introduction to CALL. In Healey D. & Johnson N. (eds.). 1995 TESOL CALL Interest Section software list, Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications: iii-vii.
  • Healey D. & Johnson N. (Eds.) (1995b). 1995 TESOL CALL Interest Section software list, Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
  • Higgins, J. J. & Johns, T., (1984). Computers in language learning. London: Collins.
  • Jones, C. & Fortescue, S., (1987). Using computers in the language classroom. Harlow: Longman.
  • Kartal, E. (2005). The Internet and Autonomous Language Learning: A Typology of Suggested Aids. Online Submission, 4(4), 1-7.
  • Kenning M-M. & Kenning M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: current theory and practice. New York: Ellis Horwood.
  • Khoshsima, H., Saed, A., & Arbabi, M. A. (2018). Online teachers’ attitudes toward using technology in teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 134-148.
  • Lancien, T. (1998). Réseau et Français Langue Etrangère" in Conférence Virtuelle sur les Applications des TIC dans l'Enseignement du Français Langue Etrangère,Agence intergouvernementale de la Francophonie, du 7 au 18 Décembre 1998.
  • Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72.
  • Levy M. (1997). CALL: context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context‐aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
  • Orr, M. (2008). Learner perceptions of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Call-EJ Online, 9(2).
  • Penning de Vries, B. W., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & van Hout, R. (2019). Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning. Language Teaching Research, 1362168818819027.
  • Pusack J. & Otto S. (1990). Applying instructional technologies. Foreign Language Annals 23, 5: 409-417.
  • Robert, Ed, Taylor. (1980). The Computer in the School: Tutor, Tool, Tutee. American Journal of Physics - AMER J PHYS. 50. 10.1119/1.12996. (Cited in: Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.)
  • Rüschoff, B. (1993). Language learning and information technology: state of the art. CALICO Journal 10, 3: 5-17.
  • Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595-613.
  • Schneider, E.W & Bennion, J.L., (1984). Veni, vidi, vici, via videodisc: a simulator for instructional courseware. In Wyatt, D.H. (ed.). Computer assisted language instruction. Oxford: Pergamon.
  • Şengül, M., & Türel, Y. K. (2019). Teaching turkish as a foreign language with interactive whiteboards: a case study of multilingual learners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 101-115.
  • Sun, Y. C. (2009). Voice blog: An exploratory study of language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 88-103.
  • Tabatabaee, G. A., & Rezvani, E. (2019). Effects of using english podcasts on idioms and vocabulary learning of iranian efl learners. Indonesian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2(01).
  • Tanner, M., & Landon, M. (2009). The effects of computer-assisted pronunciation readings on ESL learners’ use of pausing, stress, intonation, and overall comprehensibility. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 51-65.
  • Taylor R. (1980). The computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Taylor M.B. & Perez L.M. (1989). Something to do on a Monday. La Jolla, CA: Athelstan.
  • Underwood, J. (1984), Linguistics, computers and the language teacher: a communicative approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Ware, P., & O'Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63.
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.
  • Warschauer M. & Healey D. (1998). Computers and language learning: an overview. Language Teaching 31: 57-71.
  • Warschauer, M., (2000). CALL for the 21st Century. IATEFL and ESADE Conference, 2 July 2000, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.gse.uci.edu/markw/cyberspace.html
Toplam 46 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nihat Yiğitcan Badem Bu kişi benim

Fatma Demiray Akbulut 0000-0003-0689-8483

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Badem, N. Y., & Demiray Akbulut, F. (2019). A General View on Utilization of Computational Technologies in Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Education Reform Journal, 4(2), 35-53.