Research Article

Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey

Volume: 5 Number: 2 June 30, 2022
EN

Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey

Abstract

Houses are the places where people spend most of their time. That is why indoor air quality at home is essential for public health. Sufficient ventilation is the factor to avoid accumulation of pollutants in indoor air, which include microorganisms, such as SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, adequate ventilation is needed to provide good indoor air quality for human health and reduce infection risk at home. There are no reports of residential ventilation rates in Turkey. In this study, CO2 concentrations were measured in two residences in Izmir, Turkey. Three experiments were conducted to determine background concentrations and the rate of natural ventilation with infiltration and opening windows. Results show that air exchange provided by infiltration is low for both case rooms, while adequate ventilation could be achieved with natural ventilation under the studied conditions. Infiltration provided air exchange and ventilation rates of 0.18 h-1 and 5.9 m3/h for Case 1 and 0.29 h-1 and 8.23 m3/h for Case 2, respectively. Air exchange and ventilation rates were increased to 2.36 h-1 and 76.9 m3/h for Case 1 and 1.2 h-1 and 34 m3/h for Case 2, respectively, by opening the windows. Although ventilation can be provided by opening the windows, the other factors that determine its rate, e.g., meteorological variables, cannot be controlled by the occupants. Consequently, people cannot ensure the good indoor air quality in bedrooms and sufficient reduction in transmission of pathogenic microorganisms; therefore, risk of spreading diseases such as COVID-19 at home.

Keywords

References

  1. L. Morawska, G.A. Ayoko, G.N. Bae, G. Buonanno, C.H.Y. Chao, S. Clifford, S.C. Fu, et al., “Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: the main routes of exposure,” Environment International, Vol. 108, pp. 75-83, 2017.
  2. L. Morawska and J. Cao, “Airborne transmission of Sars-Cov-2: the World should face the reality,” Environment International, Vol. 139, 2020.
  3. L. Morawska, J.W. Tang, W. Bahnfleth, P.M. Bluyssen, A. Boerstra, G. Buonanno, J. Cao, et al., “How can airborne transmission of Covid-19 indoors be minimised?” Environment International, Vol. 142, 2020.
  4. V.T. Chu, A.R. Yousaf, K. Chang, N.G. Schwartz, C.J. McDaniel, S.H.Lee, C.M. Szablewski, et al., “Household transmission of Sars-Cov-2 from children and adolescents,” Journal of Medicine, Vol. 385, pp. 954-956, 2021.
  5. S.C. Sofuoglu and M. Toksoy, “COVID-19 ve okullarda mekanik havalandırmanın aciliyeti,” TTMD Dergisi, Vol. 129, pp. 40-42, 2021.
  6. A. Frattolillo, L. Stabile, and M. Dell’Isola, “Natural ventilation measurements in a multi-room dwelling: critical aspects and comparability of pressurization and tracer gas decay tests,” Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 42, 2021.
  7. L. Zhao, J. Liu, and J. Ren, “Impact of various ventilation modes on IAQ and energy consumption in Chinese dwellings: “First long-term monitoring study in Tianjin, China,’’ Building and Environment, Vol. 143, pp. 99-106, 2018.
  8. C. Dimitroulopoulou, “Ventilation in European dwellings: a review,” Building and Environment, Vol. 37, pp. 109-125, 2012.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmental Engineering , Public Health , Environmental Health

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

March 7, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 30, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Taşer, A., Uçaryılmaz, S., Çataroğlu, I., & Sofuoğlu, S. C. (2022). Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey. Environmental Research and Technology, 5(2), 172-180. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1084052
AMA
1.Taşer A, Uçaryılmaz S, Çataroğlu I, Sofuoğlu SC. Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey. ERT. 2022;5(2):172-180. doi:10.35208/ert.1084052
Chicago
Taşer, Aybüke, Sedef Uçaryılmaz, Ilgın Çataroğlu, and Sait Cemil Sofuoğlu. 2022. “Indoor Air CO2 Concentrations and Ventilation Rates in Two Residences in İzmir, Turkey”. Environmental Research and Technology 5 (2): 172-80. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1084052.
EndNote
Taşer A, Uçaryılmaz S, Çataroğlu I, Sofuoğlu SC (June 1, 2022) Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey. Environmental Research and Technology 5 2 172–180.
IEEE
[1]A. Taşer, S. Uçaryılmaz, I. Çataroğlu, and S. C. Sofuoğlu, “Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey”, ERT, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 172–180, June 2022, doi: 10.35208/ert.1084052.
ISNAD
Taşer, Aybüke - Uçaryılmaz, Sedef - Çataroğlu, Ilgın - Sofuoğlu, Sait Cemil. “Indoor Air CO2 Concentrations and Ventilation Rates in Two Residences in İzmir, Turkey”. Environmental Research and Technology 5/2 (June 1, 2022): 172-180. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1084052.
JAMA
1.Taşer A, Uçaryılmaz S, Çataroğlu I, Sofuoğlu SC. Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey. ERT. 2022;5:172–180.
MLA
Taşer, Aybüke, et al. “Indoor Air CO2 Concentrations and Ventilation Rates in Two Residences in İzmir, Turkey”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, June 2022, pp. 172-80, doi:10.35208/ert.1084052.
Vancouver
1.Aybüke Taşer, Sedef Uçaryılmaz, Ilgın Çataroğlu, Sait Cemil Sofuoğlu. Indoor air CO2 concentrations and ventilation rates in two residences in İzmir, Turkey. ERT. 2022 Jun. 1;5(2):172-80. doi:10.35208/ert.1084052

Cited By