Research Article

Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles

Volume: 5 Number: 4 December 31, 2022
EN

Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles

Abstract

In this study, in order to observe the mechanical and physical properties of ordinary screed, sandy-lightweight screed and lightweight screed samples, expanded polystyrene (EPS) was used as fine aggregate and lightweight screed systems were produced by replacing sand at 100%, 50% and 0%. Samples of cement dosages of 250, 300, 350 kg/m3 were produced for lightweight screeds, sandy-lightweight screeds and ordinary screeds. Unit weight, water absorption capacity, flexural strength, compressive strength, fire resistance, abrasion and thermal conductivity tests were performed on the produced screed systems. As a result of the research, it was determined that as EPS ratio increases in screed system; unit weights decreased, water absorption rates increased. Besides, the flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance are also decreased. However, it was observed that the thermal conductivity coefficient reduced with the increment of EPS particles in the screed. In normal, sandy-lightweight and lightweight screeds, it was determined that as the cement dosage increased; the unit weights, flexural and compressive strengths, fire and abrasion resistance increased, water absorption capacity and the thermal conductivity coefficient decreased.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Moreira, J. António, and A. Tadeu, “Lightweight screed containing cork granules: Mechanical and hygrothermal characterization,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 49, pp. 1–8, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.01.012.
  2. B. Chen and N. Liu, “A novel lightweight concrete-fabrication and its thermal and mechanical properties,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 44, pp. 691–698, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.091.
  3. A. Ben Fraj, M. Kismi, and P. Mounanga, “Valorization of coarse rigid polyurethane foam waste in lightweight aggregate concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1069–1077, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.010.
  4. C. Yang and R. Huang, “Approximate Strength of Lightweight Aggregate Using Micromechanics Method,” Adv Cem Based Mater, vol. 7, pp. 133–138, 1998.
  5. E. Yasar, C. D. Atis, A. Kilic, and H. Gulsen, “Strength properties of lightweight concrete made with basaltic pumice and fly ash,” Mater. Lett., vol. 57, no. 15, pp. 2267–2270, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00146-0.
  6. T. W. Bremner, “Environmental Aspects of Concrete: Problems and Solutions,” Proc. First Russ. Conf. Concr. Reinf. Concr. Probl., no. Moscow, Russia, pp. 232–246, 2001.
  7. R. Sri Ravindrarajah and A. J. Tuck, “Properties of hardened concrete containing treated expanded polystyrene beads,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 273–277, 1994, doi: 10.1016/0958-9465(94)90039-6.
  8. N. H. Ramli Sulong, S. A. S. Mustapa, and M. K. Abdul Rashid, “Application of expanded polystyrene (EPS) in buildings and constructions: A review,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 136, no. 20, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1002/app.47529.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmentally Sustainable Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2022

Submission Date

May 20, 2022

Acceptance Date

November 3, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 5 Number: 4

APA
Kılıç, F. M., Yorulmaz, H., Özuzun, S., Durak, U., İlkentapar, S., Karahan, O., & Atiş, C. (2022). Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. Environmental Research and Technology, 5(4), 289-295. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1117728
AMA
1.Kılıç FM, Yorulmaz H, Özuzun S, et al. Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. ERT. 2022;5(4):289-295. doi:10.35208/ert.1117728
Chicago
Kılıç, Fikret Merih, Hediye Yorulmaz, Sümeyye Özuzun, et al. 2022. “Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed With and Without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles”. Environmental Research and Technology 5 (4): 289-95. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1117728.
EndNote
Kılıç FM, Yorulmaz H, Özuzun S, Durak U, İlkentapar S, Karahan O, Atiş C (December 1, 2022) Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. Environmental Research and Technology 5 4 289–295.
IEEE
[1]F. M. Kılıç et al., “Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles”, ERT, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 289–295, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35208/ert.1117728.
ISNAD
Kılıç, Fikret Merih - Yorulmaz, Hediye - Özuzun, Sümeyye - Durak, Uğur - İlkentapar, Serhan - Karahan, Okan - Atiş, Cengiz. “Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed With and Without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles”. Environmental Research and Technology 5/4 (December 1, 2022): 289-295. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1117728.
JAMA
1.Kılıç FM, Yorulmaz H, Özuzun S, Durak U, İlkentapar S, Karahan O, Atiş C. Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. ERT. 2022;5:289–295.
MLA
Kılıç, Fikret Merih, et al. “Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed With and Without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 5, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 289-95, doi:10.35208/ert.1117728.
Vancouver
1.Fikret Merih Kılıç, Hediye Yorulmaz, Sümeyye Özuzun, Uğur Durak, Serhan İlkentapar, Okan Karahan, Cengiz Atiş. Comparison of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Screed with and without Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Particles. ERT. 2022 Dec. 1;5(4):289-95. doi:10.35208/ert.1117728

Cited By