Research Article

Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques

Volume: 6 Number: 3 September 30, 2023
EN

Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques

Abstract

Today, to reduce fossil fuel consumption and to prevent gas emissions that are increasing day by day, vehicles working with electrical energy have started to be produced and developed. The environmental impact of the batteries of electric vehicles, which are increasing in number, is an undeniable fact and is predicted to be a major problem. In this study, three different alternative recycling processes were selected for waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), namely pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling.These processes were compared in terms of their technical, economic, environmental and social aspects using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach.. From this point of view, in this study, entropy method which is an objective method was used to weight the criteria and Analytic Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS methods were used to prioritise the alternatives in order to determine the best process for the recycling of waste LIBs. The alternatives were determined as being pyrometallurgical process, hydrometallurgical process and direct recycling, and these alternatives were evaluated in terms of environmental, economic, technical, and social dimensions. Afterwards, sensitivity analysis was performed. The ranking results showed that direct recycling is the best alternative (with values of 0.68 and 0.8101 for ANP and TOPSIS, respectively). In addition, sensitivity analysis was applied for the robustness of the results. As a result of the sensitivity analysis, direct recycling was found to be the best alternative.

Keywords

References

  1. S. Kocabey, “Elektrikli otomobillerin dünü, bugünü ve geleceği,” Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, Vol. 1(1), Article 1623, 2018. [Turkish].
  2. E. Can Güven, and K. Gedik, “Environmental management of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries,” Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, Vol. 9(2), pp. 726737, 2019. [CrossRef]
  3. B. Çelebi, “Plug-in hibrit elektrikli araçlar, mühendislik ve fen bilimlerinde yeni gelişmeler (pp. 167194). SRA Publishing, 2020. [Turkish]
  4. United Notions Climate Change. Sharm El-Sheikh Climate Change Conference - November 2022. https://unfccc.int/cop27 2022.
  5. İ. O. Gündüz, and S. Yakar, “Evaluation of tax incentives aimed at electric automobiles in the European Union and Turkey. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 29(4), pp. 204-222, 2020. [Turkish] [CrossRef]
  6. Y. Bai, N. Muralidharan, Y. Sun, S. Passerini, M. S. Whittingham, and I. Belharouak, “Energy and environmental aspects in recycling lithium-ion batteries: concept of battery identity global passport,” Materials Today, Vol. 41, pp. 304-315, 2020. [CrossRef]
  7. X. Shu, Y. Guo, W. Yang, K. Wei, and G. Zhu, “Life-cycle assessment of the environmental impact of the batteries used in pure electric passenger cars,” Energy Reports, Vol 7, pp. 2302-2315, 2021. [CrossRef]
  8. S. Manzetti, and F. Mariasiu, “Electric vehicle battery technologies: from present state to future systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 51, pp. 1004-1012, 2015. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmental Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2023

Submission Date

January 30, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 7, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 3

APA
Öztürk, M., Evin, E., Özkan, A., & Banar, M. (2023). Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques. Environmental Research and Technology, 6(3), 226-241. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1243162
AMA
1.Öztürk M, Evin E, Özkan A, Banar M. Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques. ERT. 2023;6(3):226-241. doi:10.35208/ert.1243162
Chicago
Öztürk, Mahmut, Esra Evin, Aysun Özkan, and Mufide Banar. 2023. “Comparison of Waste Lithium-Ion Batteries Recycling Methods by Different Decision Making Techniques”. Environmental Research and Technology 6 (3): 226-41. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1243162.
EndNote
Öztürk M, Evin E, Özkan A, Banar M (September 1, 2023) Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques. Environmental Research and Technology 6 3 226–241.
IEEE
[1]M. Öztürk, E. Evin, A. Özkan, and M. Banar, “Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques”, ERT, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 226–241, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.35208/ert.1243162.
ISNAD
Öztürk, Mahmut - Evin, Esra - Özkan, Aysun - Banar, Mufide. “Comparison of Waste Lithium-Ion Batteries Recycling Methods by Different Decision Making Techniques”. Environmental Research and Technology 6/3 (September 1, 2023): 226-241. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1243162.
JAMA
1.Öztürk M, Evin E, Özkan A, Banar M. Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques. ERT. 2023;6:226–241.
MLA
Öztürk, Mahmut, et al. “Comparison of Waste Lithium-Ion Batteries Recycling Methods by Different Decision Making Techniques”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 2023, pp. 226-41, doi:10.35208/ert.1243162.
Vancouver
1.Mahmut Öztürk, Esra Evin, Aysun Özkan, Mufide Banar. Comparison of waste lithium-ion batteries recycling methods by different decision making techniques. ERT. 2023 Sep. 1;6(3):226-41. doi:10.35208/ert.1243162

Cited By