Research Article

Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles

Volume: 8 Number: 1 March 31, 2025
EN

Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles

Abstract

This study delves into a comparative analysis of electric vehicles (EVs) and diesel vehicles (DVs) across emissions, design, technology, and fuel consumption. One of the aims is to reveal the relationship between changes in form-based mass of the designed part, material selection influenced by production technologies, and the resulting production emissions and mass-based fuel consumption. The research aims to elucidate the environmental impact of EVs and DVs, particularly focusing on emissions stemming from raw materials of the production. Methodologically, the study employs theoretical analysis alongside practical assessments using Autodesk Fusion360 and CCaLC2 software for mass determination and emissions calculation, respectively. Through an examination of key parameters such as vehicle design, material usage, and powertrain systems, the study sheds light on the nuances of emissions generated by each vehicle type's parts. The research contextualizes the growing importance of sustainable transportation solutions in the face of escalating environmental concerns, emphasizing the need for rigorous evaluation of alternative fuel vehicles. By comprehensively analyzing data on emissions, design, and fuel consumption, the study provides insights into the complexities of sustainability in the automotive industry. The findings underscore the critical role of industrial design in emissions reduction and offer recommendations for stakeholders to prioritize sustainability in vehicle production and consumption practices. Also, mentioning important notes for green consumers who are buying products according to environmental effects. The study contributes to advancing understanding in the field of sustainable transportation and underscores the importance of methodological rigor in evaluating environmental impacts.

Keywords

Thanks

We thank Rudis F&E GmbH for their valuable technical assistance.

References

  1. R. C. Allen, “The industrial revolution: A very short introduction,” Oxford University Press, 2007.
  2. J. Dargay, D. Gately, and M. Sommer, “Vehicle ownership and income growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030,” The Energy Journal, Vol. 28(4), pp. 143-170, 2007. [CrossRef]
  3. J. Martins, and F. P. Brito, “Alternative fuels for internal combustion engines,” Energies, Vol. 13(16), Article 4086, 2020. [CrossRef]
  4. K. Wróbel, J. Wróbel, W. Tokarz, J. Lach, K. Podsadni, and A. Czerwiński, “Hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles: A review,” Energies, Vol. 15(23), Article 8937, 2022. [CrossRef]
  5. M. Ciniviz, and H. Köse, “Hydrogen use in internal combustion engine: A review,” International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, Vol. 1(1), pp. 1-15, 2012.
  6. M. Nitti, V. Pilloni, G. Colistra, and L. Atzori, “The virtual object as a major element of the internet of things: a survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(2), pp. 1228-1240, 2016. [CrossRef]
  7. S. Sharma, A. K. Panwar, and M. M. Tripathi, “Storage technologies for electric vehicles,” Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 7(3), pp. 340-361, 2020. [CrossRef]
  8. M. Koniak, and A Czerepicki, “Selection of the battery pack parameters for an electric vehicle based on performance requirements,” IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 211(1), International Conference on Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering 21–23 April 2017, Bangkok, Thailand, 2017. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Human Impacts of Climate Change and Human Adaptation , Environmentally Sustainable Engineering , Sustainability and Energy

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 31, 2025

Submission Date

February 27, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 29, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 1

APA
Canbulat, M., & Alkara, İ. (2025). Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles. Environmental Research and Technology, 8(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1443410
AMA
1.Canbulat M, Alkara İ. Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles. ERT. 2025;8(1):44-56. doi:10.35208/ert.1443410
Chicago
Canbulat, Mustafa, and İbrahim Alkara. 2025. “Which One Is Greener for the Consumer? Product Emission Comparison Between Diesel and Battery Electric Vehicles”. Environmental Research and Technology 8 (1): 44-56. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1443410.
EndNote
Canbulat M, Alkara İ (March 1, 2025) Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles. Environmental Research and Technology 8 1 44–56.
IEEE
[1]M. Canbulat and İ. Alkara, “Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles”, ERT, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44–56, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.35208/ert.1443410.
ISNAD
Canbulat, Mustafa - Alkara, İbrahim. “Which One Is Greener for the Consumer? Product Emission Comparison Between Diesel and Battery Electric Vehicles”. Environmental Research and Technology 8/1 (March 1, 2025): 44-56. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1443410.
JAMA
1.Canbulat M, Alkara İ. Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles. ERT. 2025;8:44–56.
MLA
Canbulat, Mustafa, and İbrahim Alkara. “Which One Is Greener for the Consumer? Product Emission Comparison Between Diesel and Battery Electric Vehicles”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 44-56, doi:10.35208/ert.1443410.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Canbulat, İbrahim Alkara. Which one is greener for the consumer? Product emission comparison between diesel and battery electric vehicles. ERT. 2025 Mar. 1;8(1):44-56. doi:10.35208/ert.1443410