Research Article

Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case

Volume: 7 Number: 4 December 31, 2024
EN

Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case

Abstract

Several methods are used during waste management: landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, and recycling etc. In particular, the use of biogas formed through anaerobic digestion in energy production and the energy obtained through the incineration process is very effective in turning the negative effects of wastes into positive ones. In this study, the effects of three different waste management scenarios were examined from a life cycle perspective. According to the results, scenario1 (landfill and incineration), scenario2 (landfill, incineration, and anaerobic digestion), and scenario3 (landfill, anaerobic digestion, and recycle) produced emissions of 3233.1, 328.8, and -848.9 kg of CO2eq, respectively. Accordingly, and in accordance with the results of the previous studies, it is observed that the landfill application gave the worst environmental result, the incineration and anaerobic digestion applications reduce the environmental effects, and the recycling application provides environmental benefits. It is concluded that the best environmental practice is plastic and metal recycling.

Keywords

Thanks

The authors thank Bandirma Onyedi Eylul University for supporting to buy the licensed version of SimaPro 9.3.0.2 software.

References

  1. A. H. Khan, E. A. López-Maldonado, S. S. Alam, N. A. Khan, J. R. L. López, P. F. M. Herrera, and L. Singh, “Municipal solid waste generation and the current state of waste-to-energy potential: State of art review,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 267, Article 115905, 2022. [CrossRef]
  2. S. Ma, C. Zhou, J. Pan, G. Yang, C. Sun, Y. Liu, and Z. Zhao, “Leachate from municipal solid waste landfills in a global perspective: Characteristics, influential factors and environmental risks,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 333, Article 130234, 2022. [CrossRef]
  3. P. Prajapati, S. Varjani, R. R. Singhania, A. K. Patel, M. K. Awasthi, R. Sindhu, and P. Chaturvedi, “Critical review on technological advancements for effective waste management of municipal solid waste — Updates and way forward: Advancements in Municipal Solid Waste Management,” Environmental Technology and Innovation, Vol. 23, Article 101749, 2021. [CrossRef]
  4. B. Liu, L. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Demand gap analysis of municipal solid waste landfill in Beijing: Based on the municipal solid waste generation,” Waste Management, Vol. 134, pp. 42–51, 2021. [CrossRef]
  5. F. Ardolino, F. Parrillo, and U. Arena, “Biowaste-to-biomethane or biowaste-to-energy? An LCA study on anaerobic digestion of organic waste,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 174, pp. 462–476, 2018. [CrossRef]
  6. A. Y. Cetinkaya, B. Ozkaya, E. Taskan, D. Karadag, and M. Cakmakci, “The production of electricity from dual-chambered microbial fuel cell fueled by old age leachate,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, Vol. 38(11), pp. 1544–1552, 2016. [CrossRef]
  7. B. Ahmed, V. K. Tyagi, K. Aboudi, A. Naseem, C. J. Álvarez-Gallego, L. A. Fernández-Güelfo, and L. I. Romero-García, “Thermally enhanced solubilization and anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste,” Chemosphere, Vol. 282, Article 131136, 2021. [CrossRef]
  8. M. R. Atelge, H. Senol, M. Djaafri, T. A. Hansu, D. Krisa, A. Atabani, and H. D. Kıvrak, “A critical overview of the state-of-the-art methods for biogas purification and utilization processes,” Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 13(20), Article 11515, 2021. [CrossRef]

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Waste Management, Reduction, Reuse and Recycling , Energy

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2024

Submission Date

March 20, 2024

Acceptance Date

May 15, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 7 Number: 4

APA
Çetinkaya, A., & Bilgili, L. (2024). Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case. Environmental Research and Technology, 7(4), 537-546. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1455985
AMA
1.Çetinkaya A, Bilgili L. Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case. ERT. 2024;7(4):537-546. doi:10.35208/ert.1455985
Chicago
Çetinkaya, Afşin, and Levent Bilgili. 2024. “Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste: İstanbul Case”. Environmental Research and Technology 7 (4): 537-46. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1455985.
EndNote
Çetinkaya A, Bilgili L (December 1, 2024) Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case. Environmental Research and Technology 7 4 537–546.
IEEE
[1]A. Çetinkaya and L. Bilgili, “Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case”, ERT, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 537–546, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.35208/ert.1455985.
ISNAD
Çetinkaya, Afşin - Bilgili, Levent. “Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste: İstanbul Case”. Environmental Research and Technology 7/4 (December 1, 2024): 537-546. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1455985.
JAMA
1.Çetinkaya A, Bilgili L. Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case. ERT. 2024;7:537–546.
MLA
Çetinkaya, Afşin, and Levent Bilgili. “Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste: İstanbul Case”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, Dec. 2024, pp. 537-46, doi:10.35208/ert.1455985.
Vancouver
1.Afşin Çetinkaya, Levent Bilgili. Life cycle assessment of energy production from municipal solid waste: İstanbul case. ERT. 2024 Dec. 1;7(4):537-46. doi:10.35208/ert.1455985

Cited By