Comparative analysis on practical implications and evaluation of PVC geomembrane interfaces against particulate materials

Abstract

An experimental research study including a series of laboratory large displacement interface shear tests between different particulate materials (rounded, angular sands) and smooth PVC geomembranes, and additionally, a series of Shore D Hardness measurements were conducted. The aim of this study is to investigate an easy and quick means of predicting shear resistance/strength of sand-polymer interfaces indirectly from the hardness of the continuum material (i.e. PVC geomembrane) at the interface to establish a comparative analysis between direct test results and indirect practical evaluation through hardness property based on an important interface shear property; friction angle, (δ) at peak and  residual states measured directly from interface shear tests performed in the laboratory as well as computed indirectly from empirical models developed in the study for the case of different normal loading conditions (i.e. normal stress levels:25, 100, 400 kPa). The results and analysis will be presented throughout the paper demonstrate that the mobilized shear response and the resulting frictional resistance of sand (rounded, angular) – PVC geomembrane interface systems are highly dependent on a combination of loading conditions, geomembrane physical material properties (i.e. hardness) and particulate shape (i.e. angularity/roundness). For direct and indirect assessment of the resultant [δ_Peak] and [δ_Residual] values, the comparative analysis showed that a reasonable similarity between the laboratory test results and the indirect analytical assessment analysis is evident from the analogicalness of the experimentally measured values at the predetermined normal stress levels (25, 100 and 400 kPa) to the computed values from the proposed empirical correlation equations proposed in the paper.

Keywords

• Geosynthetic Layered Systems,Landfill Design,Particulate Materials,PVC Geomembranes

References

1. [1]. J. E. Dove and J. D. Frost, “Peak Friction Behavior of Smooth Geomembrane- Particle Interfaces,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 125 (7), pp. 544-555, 1999.[2]. J. P. Martin and R. M. Koerner, and J. E. Whitty, “Experimental friction evaluation of slippage between geomembranes, geotextiles and soils,”. In: Proceedings of International conference on Geomembranes, IFAI, Denver, CO, June 20-23, pp. 191–196, 1984.[3]. R. M. Koerner, J. P. Martin, and G. R. Koerner, “Shear Strength Parameters between Geomembranes and Cohesive Soils”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 4(1), pp. 21-30, 1986.[4]. J. K. Mitchell, R.B. Seed, and H. B. Seed, “Kettleman Hills Waste Landfill Slope Failure. I: Liner System Properties,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 116(4), pp. 647-668, 1990.[5]. T. D. O’Rourke, S. J. Druschel, and A. N. Netravali, “Shear strength characteristics of sand-polymer interfaces.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 116(3), pp. 451–469, 1990.[6]. P. Haasen. Physical Metallurgy, 3rd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 420, 1996.[7]. ASTM D2240-05, Standard Test Method for Rubber Property - Durometer Hardness, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2005.[8]. R. B. Seed, J. K. Mitchell, and H. B. Seed, “Kettleman Hills Waste Ladnfill Slope Failure. II: Stability Analysis,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 116(4), pp. 669-690, 1990.[9]. R. B. Seed and R. W. Boulanger, “Smooth HDPE-clay liner interface shear strengths: compaction effects,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 117 (4), pp. 686–693, 1991.[10]. R. Byrne, J. Kendall, and S. Brown. Cause and Mechanism of Failure, Kettleman Hills Facility, Kettleman City, California, Report Prepared for Chemical Waste Management, Inc. by Geosyntec Consultants, Atlanta, Georgia, 1992.[11]. J. F. Archard, “Elastic Deformation And The Laws Of Friction,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 243, Issue 1233, pp. 190-205, 1957.[12]. K. L. Johnson, “One hundred years of hertz contact,”. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 196, pp. 363–378, 1982.