Research Article

Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus

Volume: 3 Number: 3 September 30, 2020
EN

Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus

Abstract

The use of wastewater (urine) as a fertilizer was shown to potentially reduce the campus wastewater load and contribute to saving in expensive wastewater treatment, while dealing with it as valuable resource. If one assumed that this wastewater fertilizer (arguably, one of the best agriculturally acknowledged fertilizers), was applied at odor appropriate and physiologically sustainable rates (Nitrogen Loading Rate (NLR) of up to 0.73 g N m-2 week-1 equivalent to 104.28 mL urine m-2 week-1 applied for 16 weeks) and considered total available area for potential green walls, it could be stated that the entire urine stream generated daily on campus (varying from 2.2 to 4.5 m3) could be accommodated on campus green walls as a valuable resource with significant benefits. In the studies on monitored plant physiological parameters under various conditions, it was observed that urine fertilizer positively affected to the food production, inflorescences and health of butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant as well as could say that it was the most suitable plant for green wall. Further integration of urban wastewater management and agriculture (urban food production) into this scenario can make it even more attractive and economically sustainable.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Badakhshan University

Project Number

1

Thanks

It's my pleasure to meet this journal and hope to have continuous work with each other. also, thanks for providing this opportunity that scholars and institutions publish their works and research through this journal. If you require any additional information regarding my manuscript. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly via my contacts. Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

References

  1. [1]. C. Höglund, “Evaluation of microbial health risks associated with the reuse of source separated human urine,” PhD thesis, Department of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. ISBN 91-7283-039-5, 2001.
  2. [2]. WHO, “Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater excreta and greywater,” Volume IV. Excreta and Greywater Use in Agriculture”, 2006.
  3. [3]. H. JOENSSON, A. RICHERT, B. VINNERAS, E. SALOMON,: “Guidelines on the Use of Urine and Faeces in Crop Production,” Stockholm, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), EcoSanRes Publication Series, Report 2004-2, 2004.
  4. [4]. M. Johansson, “Urine Separation - Closing the Nutrient Cycle,” (Final Report of the R&D Project), Source-Separated Human Urine - A Future Source of Fertilizer for Agriculture in the Stockholm Region. Stockholm: Stockholm Vatten, Stockholmshem & HSB National Federation, 2000.
  5. [5]. H. Jonsson, A R Stinzing, B. Vinnerås, & E. Salomon, “Guidelines for the Use of Urine and Faeces in Crop Production,” EcoSanRes Publications Series, Report 2004- 2, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004.
  6. [6]. A. Munoz, M. Rueda, R. Schaldach, & J. Behrendt, “Utilisation of Urine in Agriculture,” United Nations General Assembly President Peter Thomson, 2017.
  7. [7]. C. Schoenning, & T. Stenstroem, “Guidelines on the Safe Use of Urine and Faeces in Ecological Sanitation Systems,” Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), 2004.
  8. [8]. R. Hermanson, W. Pan, C. Perillo, R. Stevens, & C. Stockle, “Nitrogen use by crops and the fate of nitrogen in the soil and vadose zone,” Washington State University and Washington Department of Ecology Interagency Agreement, (C9600177), 2000.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmental Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2020

Submission Date

June 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

September 18, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 3 Number: 3

APA
Hozad, A. S. (2020). Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus. Environmental Research and Technology, 3(3), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.758126
AMA
1.Hozad AS. Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus. ERT. 2020;3(3):129-134. doi:10.35208/ert.758126
Chicago
Hozad, Ahmad Shabir. 2020. “Effects of Nitrogen Recycling by Human Urine Fertilization on Butterfly Pea (Clitoria Ternatea) Plant in Green Wall System on AIT Campus”. Environmental Research and Technology 3 (3): 129-34. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.758126.
EndNote
Hozad AS (September 1, 2020) Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus. Environmental Research and Technology 3 3 129–134.
IEEE
[1]A. S. Hozad, “Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus”, ERT, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 129–134, Sept. 2020, doi: 10.35208/ert.758126.
ISNAD
Hozad, Ahmad Shabir. “Effects of Nitrogen Recycling by Human Urine Fertilization on Butterfly Pea (Clitoria Ternatea) Plant in Green Wall System on AIT Campus”. Environmental Research and Technology 3/3 (September 1, 2020): 129-134. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.758126.
JAMA
1.Hozad AS. Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus. ERT. 2020;3:129–134.
MLA
Hozad, Ahmad Shabir. “Effects of Nitrogen Recycling by Human Urine Fertilization on Butterfly Pea (Clitoria Ternatea) Plant in Green Wall System on AIT Campus”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 129-34, doi:10.35208/ert.758126.
Vancouver
1.Ahmad Shabir Hozad. Effects of nitrogen recycling by human urine fertilization on butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) plant in green wall system on AIT campus. ERT. 2020 Sep. 1;3(3):129-34. doi:10.35208/ert.758126