The relationship between industry 5.0 Process and ESG process: A qualitative analysis in the context of Türkiye’s BIST Sustainability 25 Index white good sector

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 512 - 529, 31.12.2024

İsmail Yoşumaz , Hülya Uzun

https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1431800

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study aims to determine the relationship between Industry 5.0 and ESG (Environmental Social Governance) processes. In addition, this study aims to reveal how this relationship is evaluated within the scope of Vestel and Arçelik enterprises in the white goods sector within the scope of the BIST (Borsa Istanbul) Sustainability 25 Index in Türkiye. For this aim, the relationship between Industry 5.0 and ESG processes was first explained using document analysis, one of the qualitative analysis techniques. Then, descriptive content analysis, which is also one of the qualitative analysis techniques, was used to examine the latest annual reports of Vestel and Arçelik, which are in the white goods sector within the scope of the BIST Sustainability 25 Index in Türkiye, published in 2022. For Industry 5.0, Industry 4.0, environment, employees and society, and finally, the resilience of businesses components were considered, while for the ESG process, environmental, social and governance components were emphasised. NVivo (version 14.23.2) software was used for the analysis. As a result of the study, it was determined that there is a close bidirectional relationship between the components in the Industry 5.0 process and the components in the ESG process. In other words, it can be said that investing in ESG processes will contribute positively to the Industry 5.0 process and investing in the Industry 5.0 process will contribute positively to the ESG process. Within the scope of Industry 5.0 and ESG processes, Vestel and Arçelik have similar studies. In addition, this study offers suggestions for developing practices for the ESG process by adapting to technological change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Industry 5.0, technology and innovation management, sustainability, knowledge management

Kaynakça

• P. K. R. Maddikunta, Q. V. B. P. Pham, N. Deepa, K. Dev, T. R. Gadekallu, … and M. Liyanage, “Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, Vol. 26, Article 100257, 2022. [CrossRef]
• V. B. Ribeiro, D. Nakano, J. Muniz, and R. B. de Oliveira, “Knowledge management and Industry 4.0: a critical analysis and future agenda,” Gestao e Producao, Vol. 29, Article e5222, 2022. [CrossRef]
• B. Yücebalkan, “Endüstri 4.0’dan endüstri 5.0’a geçiş sürecine genel bakış,” IEDSR Association, Vol. 5(9), Article 181, 2020. [CrossRef]
• G. Bayramoğlu, and E. Hasdemir, “Toplum 5.0 ve aile işletmeleri,” Aile İşletmelerinde Dijital Teknolojiler, Vol. 1, pp. 33–63, 2021.
• S. Garrido, J. Muniz, and V. Batista Ribeiro, “Operations management, sustainability & Industry 5.0: A critical analysis and future agenda,” Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, Vol. 10, Article 100141, 2024. [CrossRef]
• M. Asif, C. Searcy, and P. Castka, “ESG and industry 5.0: The role of technologies in enhancing ESG disclosure,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 195, Article 122806, 2023. [CrossRef]
• V. V. Martynov, D. N. Shavaleeva, and A. A. Zaytseva, “Information technology as the basis for transformation into a digital society and industry 5.0”. In 2019 International Conference, Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies"(IT&QM&IS), pp. 539-543, IEEE, 2019. [CrossRef]
• United Nations, “Who Cares Wins”, 2004. https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_wins_global_compact_2004.pdf Accessed on Oct 13, 2023.
• A. Sekaran, S. S. Dadwal, and A. Ali, “Industry 5.0 and environmental, social, and governance ınitiatives in supply chain sustainability: A study of the European fast fashion industry”, Opportunities and Challenges of Business 5.0 in Emerging Markets, pp. 151-171, 2023. [CrossRef]
• D. Zhang, Z. Zhao, and C. K. M. Lau, “Sovereign ESG and corporate investment: New insights from the United Kingdom,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 183, Article 121899, 2022. [CrossRef]
• A. Fatemi, M. Glaum, and S. Kaiser, “ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure,” Global Finance Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 45-64, 2018. [CrossRef]
• F. Alkaraan, K. Albitar, K. Hussainey, and V. G. Venkatesh, “Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG),” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 175, Article 121423, 2022. [CrossRef]
• M. Kumar, R. D. Raut, S. K. Mangla, S. Chowdhury, and V. K. Choubey, “Moderating ESG compliance between industry 4.0 and green practices with green servitisation: Examining its impact on green supply chain performance,” Technovation, Vol. 129, Article 102898, 2024. [CrossRef]
• S. Grabowska, S. Saniuk, and B. Gajdzik, “Industry 5.0: improving humanisation and sustainability of Industry 4.0,” Scientometrics, Vol. 127(6), 2022.
• European Union, “Industry 5.0”, 2018, https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en, Accessed on Jan 29, 2024.
• S. Güğerçin, and U. Güğerçin “How employees survive in the industry 5.0 era: In-demand skills of the near future,” International Journal of Disciplines Economics & Administrative Sciences Studies, Vol. 7 (31), pp. 524-533, 2021. [CrossRef]
• Y. Uyanık, “Neoliberal Küreselleşme Sürecinde İşgücü Piyasaları”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 10(2), pp. 209–224, 2008.
• K. A. Demir, G. Döven, and B. Sezen, “Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 158, pp. 688-695, 2019.
• X. Xu, Y. Lu, B. Vogel-Heuser, and L. Wang, “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 61, pp. 530-535, 2021. [CrossRef]
• D. Mourtzis, “Digital twin inception in the Era of industrial metaverse,” Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 3, Article 1155735, 2023. [CrossRef]
• R. G. Eccles, L. E. Lee, and J. C. Stroehle, “The social origins of ESG: An analysis of innovest and KLD,” Organ Environ, Vol. 33(4), pp. 575-596, 2020. [CrossRef]
• L. Caplan, J. S. Griswold, and W. F. Jarvis, “From SRI to ESG: The changing world of responsible investing,” Commonfund Institute, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559300.pdf, 2013, Accessed on Nov 04, 2023.
• A. Edmans, “The end of ESG,” Financial Management, Vol. 52(1), pp. 3-17, 2023. [CrossRef]
• S. Mathis, “What is environmental, social and governance (ESG)?”, TechTarget, 2022, https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/environmental-social-and-governance-ESG Accessed on Dec 12, 2022.
• N. Tamimi, and R. Sebastianelli, “Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores,” Management Decision, Vol. 55(8), pp. 1660-1680, 2017. [CrossRef]
• D. Avramov, S. Cheng, A. Lioui, and A. Tarelli, “Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 145(2), pp. 642-664, 2022. [CrossRef]
• Borsa İstanbul, BIST Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksi Temel Kuralları, 2014.
• Borsa İstanbul, Sürdürülebilirlik Endeksleri, 2021. https://www.borsaistanbul.com/tr/sayfa/165/bist-surdurulebilirlik-endeksleri, Accessed on Dec 03, 2023.
• S. Kim, and Z. Li, “Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance”, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 13(7), Article 3746, 2021. [CrossRef]
• M. Liu, “Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings,” Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13, Article 936798, 2022. [CrossRef]
• X. Liu, H. Wu, W. Wu, Y. Fu, and G. Q. Huang, “Blockchain-enabled ESG reporting framework for sustainable supply chain,” Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, Vol. 200, 2021. [CrossRef]
• J. Reid, and P. Castka, “The impact of remote sensing on monitoring and reporting - The case of conformance systems,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 393(1), Article 136331, 2023. [CrossRef]
• M. A. Khan, and L. Smith Law, “The role of national cultures in shaping the corporate management cultures: A three-country theoretical analysis,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Business Information Management Association Conference - Innovation Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, IBIMA 2015, pp. 2426–2443, 2015.
• O. Meti̇n, and Ş. Ünal, “İçerik analiz tekniği: İletişim bilimlerinde ve sosyolojide doktora tezlerinde kullanımı,” Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 2(22), pp. 273–294, 2022. [CrossRef]
• Z. Karataş, “Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri,” Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 1(1), pp. 62-80, 2015.
• A. Baltacı, “Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır?” Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol. 5(2), pp. 368-388, 2019. [CrossRef]
• M. Breque, L. De Nul, and A. Petridis, “Industry 5.0 Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry,” 2021. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/468a892a-5097-11eb-b59f-01aa75ed71a1 Accessed on Oct 31, 2023.
• Cisco, “What is Business Resilience? – Cisco”, 2022, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/hybrid-work/what-is-business-resilience.html,Accessed on Dec 08, 2023.
• European Commission, “Industry 5.0”, Research and Innovation, 2022, https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/industrial-research-and-innovation/industry-50_en, Accessed on July 02, 2023.
• K. Schwab, “Dördüncü Sanayi Devrimi,” Optimist Yayım Dağıtım San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti, 2016.
• R. Morrar, M. Rajahonka, and M. Westurlund, “The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective,” Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol. 7(11), pp. 12–20, 2017. [CrossRef]
• C. Rathfelder, and C. Lanting, “Smart Systems Integration in Industrie/y 4.0”, Best Practices in the European Smart Systems Integration Ecosystem: From Education to Markets, pp. 1–20, 2014.
• R. Hajj, S. Peasley, J. Hunt, H. Ashton Manolian, and D. Beckoff, “Cyber security for smart factories,” 2020.
• International Telecommunication Union, “Series X: Data networks, Open System Communications and Security: Telecommunication security - Overview of cybersecurity”, ITU-T X.1205 Recommendation, 1205 (Rec. ITU-T X.1205 (04/2008)), 2–3. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.1205-200804-I, 2008.
• M. K. Hasan, A. A. Habib, Z. Shukur, F. Ibrahim, S. Islam, and M. A. Razzaque, “Review on cyber-physical and cyber-security system in smart grid: Standards, protocols, constraints, and recommendations,” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 209, Article 103540, 2023. [CrossRef]
• J. Rifkin, “The zero marginal cost society the internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism,” Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
• S. Schrauf, J. Vedsø, and R. Geissbauer, “A strategist’s guide to industry 4.0”, Strategy + Business, no. 83, 2016, https://www.strategy-business.com/article/A-Strategists-Guide-to-Industry-4.0 Accessed on Sep. 11, 2022.
• A. Inamdar, “Digital transformation and its impact on organisational culture,” Forbes, 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2022/07/22/digital-transformation-and-its-impact-on-organizational-culture/?sh=695a669829a2 Accessed on Oct 06, 2023.
• E. Yavaşgel, and E. Turdubaeva, “Digital Culture and Power,” Digital Siege, Istanbul University Press, 2021, pp. 1–31. [CrossRef]
• Digital Sociology, “Digital culture what it is and why it’s important”, 2021. https://digitalsociology.org.uk/digital-culture/ Accessed on Sep 14, 2023.
• CISA, “Improving Security of Open Source Software in Operational Technology and Industrial Control Systems,” 2023. https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2023/231011-2.pdf Accessed on Nov 12, 2023.
• E. Valette, H. Bril El-Haouzi, and G. Demesure, “Industry 5.0 and its technologies: A systematic literature review upon the human place into IoT- and CPS-based industrial systems,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 184, Article 109426, 2023. [CrossRef]
• B. Wang, H. Zhou, X. Li, G. Yang, P. Zheng, C. Song, ... L. Wang, “Human digital twin in the context of industry 5.0”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 85, Article 102626, 2024. [CrossRef]
• Y. P. Tsang, T. Yang, Z. S. Chen, C. H. Wu, and K. H. Tan, “How is extended reality bridging human and cyber-physical systems in the IoT-empowered logistics and supply chain management?”, Internet of Things (Netherlands), Vol. 20, 2022. [CrossRef]
• A. Abbasi, “The metaverse and NFTs: What agencies and brand leaders should know,” 2022. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2022/01/06/the-metaverse-and-nfts-what-agencies-and-brand-leaders-should-know/?sh=2edfec54200b Accessed on Feb 06, 2022.
• A. Altaf, F. Iqbal, R. Latif, B. M. Yakubu, S. Latif, and H. Samiullah, “A survey of blockchain technology: Architecture, applied domains, platforms, and security threats”, Vol. 41(5), pp. 1941–1962, 2022. [CrossRef]
• Türkiye Gazetesi, “Dünyanın konuştuğu NFT teknolojisine Türkçe ayarı: İsmin açılımı belirlendi”, 2022, https://www.turkiyegazetesi.com.tr/teknoloji/851664.aspx Accessed on July 24, 2022.
• R. Davies, “Industry 4.0. digitalisation for productivity and growth,” European Parliamentary Research Service, Vol. 9, Article 10, 2015.
• I. Lee, “Pricing and profit management models for SaaS providers and IaaS providers,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 16(4), pp. 859-873, 2021. [CrossRef]
• L. Alliance, “What is LoRaWAN® Specification - LoRa Alliance®,” 2022. https://lora-alliance.org/about-lorawan/ Accessed on Oct 13, 2023.
• A. Gülbaşı, and F. Karahan, “Finansal sistemde bilgi teknolojileri ve kullanımı,” Uluslararası Sosyal ve Ekonomik Çalışmalar Dergisi, Vol. 4(2), 296-319, 2023. [CrossRef]
• C. Zhang, Z. Wang, G. Zhou, F. Chang, D. Ma, Y. Jing, ... and D. Zhao, “Towards new-generation human-centric smart manufacturing in Industry 5.0: A systematic review,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 57, Article 102121, 2023. [CrossRef]
• N. Sharp, “Industry 5.0 and the future of sustainable manufacturing”, Escatec, 2021. https://www.escatec.com/blog/industry-5.0-and-the-future-of-sustainable-manufacturing Accessed on Oct 13, 2023.
• S. Lovick, “What is the sharing economy?” Business Because, 2020. https://www.businessbecause.com/news/insights/6736/what-is-the-sharing-economy Accessed on March 27, 2022.
• J. Brown, T. Gosling, B. Sethi, B. Sheppard, C. Stubbings, J. Svioka, … D. Zarubina, “Workforce of the future: The competing forces shaping 2030”, PWC Global Industry. 2017. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/people-organisation/workforce-of-the-future/workforce-of-the-future-the-competing-forces-shaping-2030-pwc.pdf Accessed on Oct 31, 2024.
• V. Özdemir, and N. Hekim, “Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence, ‘the internet of things’ and next-generation technology policy,” OMICS, Vol. 22(1), pp. 65–76, 2018. [CrossRef]
• G. Kavallieratos, and S. Katsikas, “Managing cyber security risks of the cyber-enabled ship,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, Vol. 8(10), Article 768, 2020. [CrossRef]
• M. Maisey, “Moving to analysis-led cyber-security,” Network Security, Vol. 2014(5), pp. 5–12, 2014. [CrossRef]
• S. Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, “Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 64, pp. 424–428, 2022. [CrossRef]
• J. Barata, and I. Kayser, “Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 219, pp. 778–788, 2023. [CrossRef]
• A. Ben Youssef, and I. Mejri, “Linking digital technologies to sustainability through Industry 5.0: A bibliometric analysis,” Sustainability, Vol. 15(9), Article 7465, 2023. [CrossRef]
• M. Golovianko, V. Terziyan, V. Branytskyi, and D. Malyk, “Industry 4.0 vs. industry 5.0: Co-existence, transition, or a hybrid,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 217, pp. 102–113, 2023. [CrossRef]
• J. Leng, Y. Zhong, Z. Lin, K. Xu, D. Mourtzis, X. Zhou, … and W. Shen, “Towards resilience in Industry 5.0: A decentralised autonomous manufacturing paradigm,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 71, pp. 95–114, 2023. [CrossRef]
• T. Tagarev, “Digilience - a platform for digital transformation, cyber security and resilience,” Information & Security: An International Journal, Vol. 43(1), pp. 7-10, 2019. [CrossRef]
• T. T. Li, K. Wang, T. Sueyoshi, and D. D. Wang, “Esg: Research progress and future prospects”, Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 13(21), Article 11663, 2021. [CrossRef]
• L. H. Pedersen, S. Fitzgibbons, and L. Pomorski, “Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 142(2), pp. 572597, 2021. [CrossRef]
• K. Belton, and R. Olson, “Smart factories: Issues of information governance,” Manufacturing Policy Initiative, 2019. http://web.archive.org/web/20200403003002/https://manufacturingpolicy.indiana.edu/index.html Accessed on Nov 05, 2023.
• A. Adel, “Future of industry 5.0 in society: human-centric solutions, challenges and prospective research areas,” Adel Journal of Cloud Computing, Vol. 11, Article 40, 2022. [CrossRef]
• Arçelik, Arçelik 2022 Faaliyet Raporu, 2022. https://www.arcelikglobal.com/media/7260/arcelik_fr_22_tr.pdf Accessed on Nov. 05, 2023.
• Vestel, Vestel 2022 Faaliyet Raporu, 2022. https://www.vestelyatirimciiliskileri.com/_assets/pdf/faliyet/2022/VESTL_Entegre_Faaliyet_Raporu_2022_new.pdf Accessed on Nov. 05, 2023.