A SIMULATION STUDY ON NEUROMUSCULAR FACTORS AFFECTING CONSECUTIVE MOTOR UNIT ACTION POTENTIAL WAVESHAPE

Abstract

Quantification of consecutive motor unit potential (MUP) is used to diagnose and monitor the progress of neuromuscular pathologies in clinical applications. In this study, a detailed motor unit simulation was conducted to reveal and understand the factors affecting MUPs. Using a volume conductor model and real muscle parameters, normal and pathologic MUPs were created. The shape changes observed in consecutive MUPs, called jiggle, are calculated with a quantification method. Increased jitter duration and re-innervation percentage commonly observed during motor unit loss increase the jiggle value proportionally. Moreover, increasing fiber density changing different regions of a muscle bundle decreases the jiggle value. The blocking phenomena generally observed in re-innervated fibers affects the jiggle value similar to jitter duration. But, higher blocking levels (50%) of re-innervated motor fiber do not have an effect on jiggle value as lower levels of blocking (20%). In conclusion, simulation of pathological MUPs showed that it is useful for clinicians to understand the progress of a neuromuscular pathology and the factors affecting consecutive MUP wave shape.

Keywords

• Motor Unit Action Potential
• Neuromuscular Pathology
• Motor Unit Instability
• Motor Unit Simulation

References

1. [1] A. Uncini, D.J. Lange, R.E. Lovelace, M. Solomon, A.P. Hays, Long-duration polyphasic motor unit potentials in myopathies: a quantitative study with pathological correlation, Muscle Nerve 13(3) (1990) 263-7.
2. [2] F. Buchthal, C. Guld, P. Rosenfalck, Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables, Acta Physiol Scand 32(2-3) (1954) 200-18.
3. [3] E.V. Stalberg, M. Sonoo, Assessment of variability in the shape of the motor unit action potential, the "jiggle," at consecutive discharges, Muscle Nerve 17(10) (1994) 1135-44.
4. [4] C. Campos, A. Malanda, L. Gila, V. Segura, I. Lasanta, J. Artieda, Quantification of jiggle in real electromyographic signals, Muscle Nerve 23(7) (2000) 1022-1034.
5. [5] A. Sandberg, B. Hansson, E. Stalberg, Comparison between concentric needle EMG and macro EMG in patients with a history of polio, Clin Neurophysiol 110(11) (1999) 1900-1908.
6. [6] S.D. Nandedkar, D.B. Sanders, E.V. Stalberg, S. Andreassen, Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials, Muscle Nerve 11(2) (1988) 151-9.
7. [7] E. Stalberg, L. Karlsson, Simulation of the normal concentric needle electromyogram by using a muscle model, Clin Neurophysiol 112(3) (2001) 464-471.
8. [8] E. Stålberg, J. Ekstedt, Single Fibre EMG and Microphysiology of the Motor Unit in Normal and Diseased Human Muscle, New Development in Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology vol 1 (1973) pp 113-129.

9. [9] S. Verma, J. Lin, Stimulated jitter analysis for the evaluation of neuromuscular junction disorders in children, Muscle Nerve 53(3) (2016) 471-2.
10. [10] F. Spaans, J.W. Vredeveld, H.H.E. Morre, B.C. Jacobs, M.H. de Baets, Single fiber EMG in early Guillain-Barre syndrome: blocking at increased and normal jitter, Neuromuscular Disord 12(7-8) (2002) 726-726.
11. [11] S.D. Nandedkar, E. Stalberg, Simulation of single muscle fibre action potentials, Med Biol Eng Comput 21(2) (1983) 158-65.
12. [12] P. Rosenfalck, Intra- and extracellular potential fields of active nerve and muscle fibres. A physico-mathematical analysis of different models, Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 321 (1969) 1-168.
13. [13] J. Rodriguez-Falces, Understanding the electrical behavior of the action potential in terms of elementary electrical sources, Adv Physiol Educ 39(1) (2015) 15-26.
14. [14] T. Kapelner, N. Jiang, A. Holobar, I. Vujaklija, A.D. Roche, D. Farina, O.C. Aszmann, Motor Unit Characteristics after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation, PLoS One 11(2) (2016) e0149772.
15. [15] V.A. Selvan, Single-fiber EMG: A review, Ann Indian Acad Neurol 14(1) (2011) 64-7.
16. [16] Z.C. Lateva, K.C. McGill, M.E. Johanson, Increased jitter and blocking in normal muscles due to doubly innervated muscle fibers, Muscle Nerve 28(4) (2003) 423-431.
17. [17] G.E. McCall, W.C. Byrnes, A. Dickinson, P.M. Pattany, S.J. Fleck, Muscle fiber hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and capillary density in college men after resistance training, J Appl Physiol (1985) 81(5) (1996) 2004-12.
18. [18] E. Bloch-Gallego, Mechanisms controlling neuromuscular junction stability, Cell Mol Life Sci 72(6) (2015) 1029-1043.