DETERMINATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF LIGHT SHELVES FOR MORE EFFECTIVE BENEFIT FROM DAYLIGHT IN BUILDINGS

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 44 - 65, 28.03.2024

Hatice Günseli Demirkol , Furkan Meral

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1261455

Öz

Studies on the efficient use of daylight in sustainable architectural design and energy conservation are increasing. Indoor lighting methods include daylighting, artificial, and integrated lighting. Basic priorities in lighting are such as “effective use of daylight”, “uniform illumination in space”, “glare control”, “visual connection with the external environment” and “daylight harvesting.” Advanced contemporary systems include light shelves and light tubes. Light shelves consist of horizontal or slightly angled elements that can be applied to the inner and outer surfaces of the window openings, usually at eye level, to block the daylight or to reflect it to the ceiling, integrated with the facade, or added later. In this research, light shelves, which is one of the advanced daylighting methods, are emphasized. Daylight analysis method was carried out with the help of a physical model and computer simulation techniques using DiaLux software. To effectively utilize the daylight factor in the internal volume through light shelf, certain parameters such as the height and angle of the light shelf, date and time, and direction of the room's opening, play a crucial role. In daylight analyzes, these parameters were subjected to experimental testing both in physical models and through computer simulations. As a result of the comparison of the obtained data, alternatives that will provide the opportunity to benefit from daylight in the most effective way have been identified. The results obtained have unique value and widespread impact in terms of sustainable architecture and energy saving. The study's originality lies in its specific measurements of the latitude in which it is located, as it is the first time the study is conducted under Eskisehir's conditions. In addition, the examination of the advantages and disadvantages of the light shelf in specific combinations is another original side of the project.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Light shelf, Daylight, Efficiency, Illumination, Reflection, Architecture

Proje Numarası

1919B012005715

Kaynakça

• [1] Kontadakis A, Tsangrassoulis A, Doulos L, Zerefos S. Review of Light Shelf Designs for Daylit Environments, MPDI Sustainability. Basel, Switzerland, 2017; 10-71.
• [2] Rashid M, Zimring C. A Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships Between Indoor Environment and Stress in Health Care and Office Settings. Sage Publications, 2008; 151-190.
• [3] Yener A K. Methods of Use of Daylight in Buildings, Contemporary Techniques, VIII. National Installation Engineering Congress. İzmir Tepekule Congress and Exhibition Center, 2007; 231.
• [4] Kılıç Demircan R, Gültekin A B. Investigation of Passive and Active Solar Systems in Buildings. TÜBAV Bilim Dergisi, 2017; 10 (1), 36-51.
• [5] US Green Building Council. 2006. LEED-NC (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design). Version 2.2. www.usgbc.org/LEED/ Access Date 20th December, 2023; 10:40.
• [6] İstanbul, Türkiye: Beta. Neuferd E. Çağla Özaslan (Ed.) Lighting Lighting Glass, Building Design Information, 2009; 35, 166.
• [7] Reinhart C F, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z. Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. LEUKOS, 2006; 7-31.
• [8] Fabi V, Andersen R V, Corgnati S, Olesen B W. Occupants’ window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models, The International Journal of Building Science and its Applications, 2012; 188-198.
• [9] Erel B. A Research on New Technologies Developed in Daylighing, Master Thesis. Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 2004; 4-5.
• [10] GKS Dergisi, Sun Control: Sun Reflector and Shelves, https://gksdergisi.com/gunes-kontrolu- gunes-kirici-ve-raflari/. Publication date 18th March, 2018. Access date 2nd February, 2022; 00:22.
• [11] Warrier A G, Raphael B. Performance evaluation of light shelves, Energy and Buildings 2017; 140, 19–27.
• [12] Barker L L. Comminication in the classroom. Prentice Hall Inc: Englewoods Cliffs. 1982; 55-72.
• [13] Lighting Research Center, Guide for Daylighting Schools. 850 West Morgan Street Raleigh, NC 27603 2004; 9-10
• [14] Kurtay C, Esen O. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 2019; 34:2, 835-843.
• [15] Meresi A. Evaluating daylight performance of light shelves combined with external blinds in south-facing classrooms in Athens. Energy and Buildings, 2016; 116, 190-205.
• [16] Michel L, Scartezzini J. Implementing the partial daylight factor method under a scanning sky simulator. Solar Energy, 2002; 473-492.
• [17] Chen Y, Liu J, Pei J, Cao X, Chen Q and Jiang J. Experimental and simulation study on the performance of daylighting in an industrial building and its energy saving potential. Energy and Buildings, 2014; 184-191.
• [18] Selkowitz S. A Hemispherical Sky Simulator For Daylighting Model Studies. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1981.
• [19] Ahmad A, Kumar A, Prakash O, Aman A. Daylight availability assessment and the application of energy simulation software – A literature review, Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2020; 679-689.
• [20] Işık U. The Assessment of Relationship Between Lighting Design Programs and Rendering Plugins, Master Thesis. Yıldız Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul, 2009; 69.
• [21] Pelsan, reflection values of materials, https://www.pelsan.com.tr/tr-TR/aydinlatma-hesaplari/26124. Publication date 24th December, 2016. Access Date 25th August, 2021; 10:40.
• [22] Ruck N, vd. Christoffersen J. (Ed.) S. Daylight in Buildings, a source book on daylighting systems and components, International Energy AgencyEnergy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems Programme. USA: ECBCS Annex. 2000; 2-20,4-26.
• [23] Costanzo V, Evola G, Marletta L. A review of daylighting strategies in schools: state of the art and expected future trends Buildings MDPI. 2017; 7-41.