Effect of negative pressure wound therapy applied in the emergency center on postoperative infection rates in patients with orthopedic open wounds
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) applied in the emergency department on postoperative infection rates in patients with orthopedic open injuries.
Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included 80 patients who presented with orthopedic open injuries. Patients were divided into two groups: NPWT group (n=40) and control group receiving standard wound care (n=40). An average pressure of 125±25 mmHg was applied in the NPWT group. Demographic characteristics, wound characteristics, infection rates, length of hospital stay, and treatment outcomes were evaluated.
Results: The infection rate in the NPWT group (7.5%) was significantly lower compared to the control group (25.0%) (P=0.034). The NPWT group showed significantly lower numbers of surgical debridement (1.3±0.6 vs 2.1±0.8, P=0.008), shorter antibiotic use duration (10±3 vs 14±4 days, P=0.003), and shorter hospital stay (8±2 vs 14±3 days, P<0.001). Primary closure rate was significantly higher in the NPWT group (70%) compared to the control group (30%) (P=0.002).
Conclusions: NPWT applied in the emergency department significantly reduces postoperative infection rates, accelerates wound healing, and shortens hospital stay in orthopedic open injuries. These findings suggest that NPWT may have an important role in the early treatment protocol of open injuries.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Rupp M, Popp D, Alt V. Prevention of infection in open fractures: Where are the pendulums now? Injury. 2020;51 Suppl 2:S57-S63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.074.
- 2. Zaver V, Kankanalu P. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. 2023 Sep 4. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–.
- 3. Wang B, Xiao X, Zhang J, Han W, Hersi SA, Tang X. Epidemiology and microbiology of fracture-related infection: a multicenter study in Northeast China. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02629-6.
- 4. Van Rysselberghe NL, Gonzalez CA, Calderon C, Mansour A, Oquendo YA, Gardner MJ. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Extremity Open Wound Management: A Review of the Literature. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(Suppl 4):S6-S11. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002430.
- 5. Hollins AW, Mithani SK. Advances in Soft Tissue Injuries Associated with Open Fractures. Hand Clin. 2023;39(4):605-616. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2023.05.008.
- 6. Dvorak JE, Lasinski AM, Romeo NM, Hirschfeld A, Claridge JA. Fracture related infection and sepsis in orthopedic trauma: A review. Surgery. 2024;176(2):535-540. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.031.
- 7. Wu L, Wen B, Xu Z, Lin K. Research progress on negative pressure wound therapy with instillation in the treatment of orthopaedic wounds. Int Wound J. 2022;19(6):1449-1455. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13741.
- 8. Patro BP, Khuntia S, Sahu NK, Das G, Patra SK. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Assisted Closure: An Effective Mode of Management for Infected and Contaminated Wound With Non-Union Fracture Femur. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9037. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9037.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Emergency Medicine
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Semih Eriten
*
0000-0001-8516-372X
Türkiye
Vedat İzci
0009-0009-5731-4696
Türkiye
Serdar Menekşe
0000-0002-4121-8917
Türkiye
Early Pub Date
August 19, 2025
Publication Date
November 4, 2025
Submission Date
April 19, 2025
Acceptance Date
August 17, 2025
Published in Issue
Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 6